MD – earlier i read how there is no evidence of Occupy and union violence because there was little to no media coverage, and if it happened, it would have been covered

That’s always a bad argument. There’s an amazing number of things that even when cover3ed, never get traction. When the media swarms over something, it sort of looks like taht is what it does all the time.

I heard all the Jews got phone calls to get out of the tent early.

Pious Agnostic wins the thread!

Translation: They built an effective barrier to stop Hamasholes from sneaking across the border and into Israeli homes so they could slit the throats of sleeping children.

Remember the brave Palestinian resistance fighter who emptied his automatic rifle into an occupied car seat?

The left supports him and his cause.

So, why are we shocked that they do their damnedest to cover for the violence-prone in their own ranks? How long has the left been covering for the “animal rights” terrorists and “eco” terrorists and all the various Communist terrorist groups, from the Shining Path to Red Brigades to Weather Underground.

The left adores the violent. They think being violent means you’re more committed to “the cause”.

Why do you think they rally around Kimberlin?

Ah, but going on the offensive just isn’t in the Republican playbook, but whining is in there.

Be honest here. Would you rather have Crowder win in the courtroom or duck the wild roundhouse right and then hit him with a uppercut to the nose, then slam a left hook to the temple, putting said dude on queer street.

You concerned about the lefty press and how they’d spin the incident? Well it’s all there to see and who it was that instigated the scrum.