Comments on: L.A. Weekly Story on SWATting Gets Links

By: Rob Crawford

Rob Crawford — Mon, 12 Nov 2012 17:16:56 +0000

Excluding people who don’t agree with you is not a winning strategy.

Really? You leftards seem to be quite successful with it.

By: SPQR

SPQR — Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:02:05 +0000

reincarnation, you’ve been caught in multiple lies. And you’ve even lied about being banned.

By: Charles Vairin

Charles Vairin — Sat, 10 Nov 2012 16:59:49 +0000

Is this not illegal search and seizure? Should the cops not be required to at least call back to the number. I say it is crap that they act this way. Not even a phone call! All they really know is that some idiot called and that they have no evidence only an unverified phone call. It is as bad as having a bench warrant issued for your arrest because someone without id has given your name when arrested.
I don’t sympathize with the cops for doing a terrible job. Why should anyone spend the weekend in jail or have their lives threatened by the cops because the established a stupid procedure and hide behind it. Why shouldn’t they be arrested for unacceptable behaviour and false arrest.

By: reincarnation

reincarnation — Sat, 10 Nov 2012 08:51:45 +0000

@Dave surls. Maybe you need to learn something about my “idiocy” because my so-called idiocy has been proven right many times. There’s wisdom in idiocy. Listen to it.

By: reincarnation

reincarnation — Sat, 10 Nov 2012 08:38:16 +0000

@Rob Crawford. Well this little piece of private property needs to get bigger and more accomodating of other people’s views if it is ever going to be a winning piece of property. Excluding people who don’t agree with you is not a winning strategy. Listen to your enemies, that way you learn more about yourself and how best to prepare for the next battle. This piece of private property needs to get bigger.

By: reincarnation

reincarnation — Sat, 10 Nov 2012 08:28:29 +0000

SPQR. If you accuse someone of lying and cannot prove it when you are called out on it, that makes you the liar. Everything I have said on this blog concerning this election has come to pass, just as I said it. That is not lying, that is stating the facts as I see them. (the Emperor).

By: reincarnation

reincarnation — Sat, 10 Nov 2012 08:07:11 +0000

@Patterico, yes “he” has made many attempts and still my comments don’t get through under my moniker, The Emperor. And yes, the Emperor is not a “she”. It would be disingenuous to keep referring to him as one. Look, I know how it feels to lose, especially after a long and bitter campaign as we had the last months. I was never going to come here and gloat. That is not my style. That election was very close; it could have gone any way. I resorted to using the name “banned commneter” and now “reincarnation” to make my case to you. You know my history as a commenter here and you know I am not in the habit of using fake user names. I also try to keep to your rules. I know I am hated here because I disagree with you guys with most things Obama. I get that. But we don’t increase knowledge by talking to only those who agree with us, we increase knowledge by also talking to those who disagree with us. This I think is the beauty of this blog. Keep it that way. Banning/moderating me because your candidate lost was wrong. An apology would be in order. Although I am not holding my breath for it. This is The Emperor using this handle “reincarnation” until the ban/moderation is reversed.

By: peedoffamerican

peedoffamerican — Sat, 10 Nov 2012 07:23:37 +0000

Don’t sweat it Pat. She/he/it makes a lot of claims that are not true.

By: Patterico

Patterico — Sat, 10 Nov 2012 02:45:42 +0000

Never suggested she was banned. She claimed to be banned, and started commenting under yet another new name, banned commentator.

I know. I was responding to her.

By: SPQR

SPQR — Sat, 10 Nov 2012 02:10:55 +0000

Martyrdom is more desirable to lovie. You are so mean for not giving it to him/her.