Sarah Palin: “The SWATting Must Stop”
At 33:28:
These are futile efforts, though, to get constitutional conservatives to sit down and shut up. And I know that some of you bloggers, oh, especially recently, experiencing terrible harassment just because you dared report accurately about a convicted criminal who’s now funded by left wing organizations.
And you’re not alone and the SWATting must stop, and those responsible for the SWATting must be held accountable by the law.
Thanks to Noodles for the link and pointer.
UPDATE: Also check out Michelle Malkin’s speech at 4:55:
Thanks again to Noodles.
Hey BK, as they say over at Hot Air, “Sh*t just got real…”
Gazzer (331276) — 6/16/2012 @ 12:27 amOh yeah, and Ding!
They are pretty good speeches if anyone is questioning whether or not they want to watch them all the way through.
Patterico should collect that reward money from Brett and head to Vegas!
Noodles (3681c4) — 6/16/2012 @ 12:43 amWow.
Thanks, Gov Palin!
Dustin (330eed) — 6/16/2012 @ 12:45 amWhy is Palin wearing a Star of David?
Mattsky (d39e6b) — 6/16/2012 @ 2:55 amwhy is sarah palin wearing clothes?
pdbuttons (cce6ad) — 6/16/2012 @ 3:40 amNoodles: The check would bounce. Digging through the 990’s for JTMP and Velvet Revolution US shows there isn’t enough money to buy a pack of gum. Or so they claim … where is the money they’ve collected from Babs and the Tides foundation (as well as other foundations)? Could it be it was spent on Neal and his beandogs? Perhaps on sockpuppets? On SWAT’ers? On personal litigation by Kimberlin against his imagined “enemies” and all too real reports of facts and truth? Inquiring minds really want to know!
plemmen (6cd503) — 6/16/2012 @ 4:32 amSarah and Michelle are both still hot.
I’m sorry, is that sexist?
I should have said, these are strong, smart, powerful, confident women who just happen to be somewhat pleasing to the eye.
And they’re hot.
/I know, I’m going to Hell. Already reserved a room, right between Jimi Hendrix and the Allman Brothers who died in the plane crash. At least the music will be good…
Hayabusa (59e303) — 6/16/2012 @ 4:56 am/Should have said the Lynyrd Skynyrd guys who died in the plane crash. But you know what I meant.
Hayabusa (59e303) — 6/16/2012 @ 4:57 amlovin’ Teddy wrong?
an’ he don’t wanna be right
bearly possible
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/ohio-teddy-bear-lover-678234
Colonel Haiku (b8a395) — 6/16/2012 @ 5:30 amMichelle Malkin says… “I am Aaron Walker”… she’s got your back, Aaron!
Colonel Haiku (b8a395) — 6/16/2012 @ 5:32 amGood for,Ms. P. whatever her detractors say, she always says what needs saying.
Sarahw (b0e533) — 6/16/2012 @ 6:39 amThe partisan danger lurks. I wish someone would notice Kimberlin has glommed onto the left to take advantage.
Sarahw (b0e533) — 6/16/2012 @ 6:41 amMichelle’s talk was far too disjointed.
She came out blazing as to why her often angry mien was justified (and it soooo is). She was liberal with pejoratives (all richly deserved) too. But, she concludes with a spiel about happy warriors and smiles. Oh well.
Ed from SFV (68921e) — 6/16/2012 @ 9:01 amClean up in aisle 14.
SPQR (26be8b) — 6/16/2012 @ 9:38 amThat anchor baby Malkin is dumber than a bag of used pucks. She can’t string a coherent paragraph together without written notes. What a maroon! Someone should force her to read a transcript of her remarks.
[UPDATED 6/16/2012: This is tpartynitwit.]
Jerome Corsi (008c05) — 6/16/2012 @ 9:40 am“Why is Palin wearing a Star of David?”
Ask your Jewish friends.
sheldon (77ac66) — 6/16/2012 @ 9:43 amThat anchor baby Malkin is dumber than a bag of used pucks. She can’t string a coherent paragraph together without written notes. What a maroon! Someone should force her to read a transcript of her remarks.
I don’t know precisely what a Jerome Corsi is, but thankfully, none of us are forced to continue reading its comments.
Dana (4eca6e) — 6/16/2012 @ 9:46 amThey knocked Palin for not reading the NY Times or Washington Post; neither of which would have informed her about SWATing, or who was doing it.
Perhaps some reporter should ask Obama and Romney what blogs they read, to truly see how they inform themselves.
Kevin M (bf8ad7) — 6/16/2012 @ 10:14 amKevin M,
Don’t we already know how President Obama informs himself and through which media outlets?
Dana (4eca6e) — 6/16/2012 @ 10:20 am==dumber than a bag of used pucks. She can’t string a coherent paragraph together without written notes. What a maroon! Someone should force her to read a transcript of her remarks==
“Jerome Corsi”–I believe you have Michelle M. confused with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz.
elissa (f56a61) — 6/16/2012 @ 10:31 amDana, yes, but let him say it while the public is paying attention. And maybe they’ll ask him about those annoying topics that the NY Times won’t cover.
Kevin M (bf8ad7) — 6/16/2012 @ 11:19 amAlthough that list does seem to run the gamut from Far Far Left to Uttermost Left.
Kevin M (bf8ad7) — 6/16/2012 @ 11:23 amThe right-wing rejected her in favor of a RINO with a $100 haircut.
CrustyB (d4da92) — 6/16/2012 @ 11:33 amJerome Corsi — writes on birther exposed of Obama.
scable (40a8c6) — 6/16/2012 @ 11:46 amObvious troll poster.
Yeah, scable, everyone realizes that “Jerome Corsi” is a sockpuppet.
SPQR (26be8b) — 6/16/2012 @ 11:54 amGood speech by Malkin. Occupyanything=poison
It’s just another version of saying “Death to America”
scable (40a8c6) — 6/16/2012 @ 12:10 pmhey I’m an American for prosperity why come nobody invited me into the club?
you want me in your club I always bring snacks for everyone and like I said I’m a complete and total whore for prosperity
call me
happyfeet (3c92a1) — 6/16/2012 @ 12:14 pmYeah, scable, everyone realizes that “Jerome Corsi” is a sockpuppet.
Comment by SPQR — 6/16/2012 @ 11:54 am
I’m a fast reader, slow comprehender.
scable (40a8c6) — 6/16/2012 @ 12:20 pm________________________________________________
The right-wing rejected her in favor of a RINO with a $100 haircut.
I don’t know about other conservatives, but I was apprehensive about her for purely non-ideological reasons. While I’d easily favor her in a split second over the liberal crud currently in the White House or a Hillary Sniper-Fire Clinton, I’m aware of purely social or superficial characteristics of a person that can easily make or break him or her. So in Palin’s case, her demeanor is too much like that of a happy-talk news lady, and that can be disconcerting.
I’m sure lots of squishes (or “centrists”) throughout America feel ever more apprehensive about such a quality, and liberals, who resist giving the benefit of the doubt to even someone with the profile of a Margaret Thatcher, would gleefully exploit that, or have done so already.
Mark (7154e5) — 6/16/2012 @ 12:29 pmSo we chose a liberal Republican who speaks well over a constitutional conservative because she talks like Edie McClurg? We need to vote smarter than that. I’ll be staying home November 6 while you libs on the left and right fight over what statist you want to be a slave under.
CrustyB (d4da92) — 6/16/2012 @ 1:05 pmshe didn’t even run she was too busy burbling on cable Mr. Crusty
happyfeet (3c92a1) — 6/16/2012 @ 1:08 pmLures and temptations can lurk around every corner. The continual threat of recidivism is great. Let’s be careful out there, Mr. Feets.
elissa (f56a61) — 6/16/2012 @ 1:19 pmgood point elissa
I am weak
I’m a run and get my friend P’s carpet shampooer thing
happyfeet (3c92a1) — 6/16/2012 @ 1:20 pm______________________________________________
So we chose a liberal Republican who speaks well over a constitutional conservative because she talks like Edie McClurg
I would have gladly nominated her and been far more confident in her in the White House than someone along the lines of who’s there now, or, yes, someone with the squishy qualities of Romney. But I don’t represent a good portion, much less majority, of the public, and I instead see so much idiotic liberalism throughout this and other industrialized, much less Third-World, societies, that even minor idiosyncrasies in a conservative politician can’t be taken lightly.
If someone as non-rightist or squishy as Romney still isn’t easily a front runner against a scroungy ultra-liberal like Obama, then that merely proves my point that modern Western society (eg, recent polling in Europe that shows over 80% willing to suckle Obama) is growing absurdly, self-destructively liberal.
Mark (7154e5) — 6/16/2012 @ 1:29 pm“23.The right-wing rejected her in favor of a RINO with a $100 haircut.”
Palin chose not to run. Whatever the reason, right or wrong, it was her decision to make.
FOAF (afeaef) — 6/16/2012 @ 1:48 pm16.“Why is Palin wearing a Star of David?”
Ask your Jewish friends.
Comment by sheldon
Sheldon they wouldn’t know why a shiksa would wear one. I’m guesiing you don’t either.
Mattsky (d39e6b) — 6/16/2012 @ 3:31 pmWhat a maroon
Bugs bunny’s old line.
I am guessing that Palin is wearing a Star of David as a symbol of her support for the Jewish people and for Israel. Perhaps there is something more specific to it, but I don’ think there needs to be. As Michael Medved and Dennis Prager point out, “theologically conservative” American Christians as a whole are among the best supporters the Jewish people and the nation of Israel have ever had.
MD in Philly (3d3f72) — 6/16/2012 @ 3:40 pmSmart boy, got a mind like a steel trap – full of mice
Foghorn Leghorn old line.
Thanks for nothing.
Mattsky (d39e6b) — 6/16/2012 @ 4:21 pmMr. buttons! I just saw you I scrolled past before
that was careless of me
happyfeet (3c92a1) — 6/16/2012 @ 6:20 pmThe fact that she was ‘hung in effigy’, her church was burned down, her emails hacked, tormented by
narciso (494474) — 6/16/2012 @ 6:51 pma father and son clique of stalkers, and her most
recent libeler, McGuinness, drew a route to her front door, she might understand what swatting
entails.
she’s had a hard time of it bless her heart
hang in there Sarah it gets better
the sun, it also rises you know
and then it sets over russia
but you knew that
happyfeet (3c92a1) — 6/16/2012 @ 6:56 pmWell, the Google will lead you to the truth (and other things):
Kevin M (bf8ad7) — 6/16/2012 @ 7:01 pmOf course that was two weeks ago…
Kevin M (bf8ad7) — 6/16/2012 @ 7:05 pm“Sheldon they wouldn’t know why a shiksa would wear one. ”
Just get their opinion on it.
sheldon (77ac66) — 6/16/2012 @ 7:13 pmhttp://rightonline.com/beta/livestream Rusty Humphries just said “The SWATtings must stop”.
Noodles (3681c4) — 6/16/2012 @ 7:41 pmSheldon, I assume she wears it because she likes it, and because of her love for Israel. When she was governor she had an Israeli flag in her office, so her wearing a magen david doesn’t surprise me. But I don’t think she wears it every day, so that particular day’s choice may just have been random. Anyway, why does it matter? It’s not as if Jews have some sort of trademark on it.
Milhouse (312124) — 6/17/2012 @ 1:13 amStill haven’t asked your Jewish friends eh?
sheldon (77ac66) — 6/17/2012 @ 4:01 amUm, what?
Milhouse (312124) — 6/17/2012 @ 4:10 amStill not getting why Mattsky’s Jewish friends would have some special insight into Mrs Palin’s choice of jewelry. Jews aren’t telepathic, you know. Surely the right person to ask would be a Palin family member or friend. Or maybe just shoot off an email to the woman herself, if you’re really curious.
Really, Sheldon, you’re going to have to spell this one out.
Milhouse (312124) — 6/17/2012 @ 10:05 amhey I’m an American for prosperity why come nobody invited me into the club?
Comment by happyfeet — 6/16/2012 @ 12:14 pm
— They DID invite you . . . but then they forgot to tell you.
It’s a thing.
Icy (a3c527) — 6/17/2012 @ 10:14 amsheldon thinks he knows something.
And that’s his first mistake.
Icy (a3c527) — 6/17/2012 @ 10:17 am“Still not getting why Mattsky’s Jewish friends would have some special insight into Mrs Palin’s choice of jewelry”
I think you kind of miss the point by calling it just “choice of jewelry” or “special insight.” That’s the sort of thing that Mattsky asking his Jewish friends for their opinion on Palin’s habit of wearing a Star of David is supposed to overcome.
sheldon (77ac66) — 6/17/2012 @ 11:29 amNo, I don’t. That is all it is, after all.
Really? What special insight are they supposed to have into why she wears it? What do you know about them that I don’t? Do you even know who Mattsky is, let alone who his friends are?
Milhouse (2e50ab) — 6/17/2012 @ 4:16 pm“Really? What special insight are they supposed to have into why she wears it? What do you know about them that I don’t? Do you even know who Mattsky is, let alone who his friends are?”
I told you it’s not special at all. Now quit playing dumb
sheldon (77ac66) — 6/17/2012 @ 5:04 pmit’s been over 24 hours since she said the swattings had to stop and guess what? No new swattings!
good work, Sarah!
happyfeet (3c92a1) — 6/17/2012 @ 5:11 pmthe interesting thing about the progress, supposedly wrought by the Stuixtnet, against
narciso (494474) — 6/17/2012 @ 5:40 pmthe Iranian reactors, is the fact that the Iranians have enough uranium for five bombs.
#55
LOL.
Same thing for my anti-tiger fences.
Haven’t had a single tiger incursion since I put them up.
Dave Surls (46b08c) — 6/17/2012 @ 6:21 pmHowever…it was so warm last night, I left my front door open, and forgot to shut the pantry.
Racoon incursion ensued.
Dave Surls (46b08c) — 6/17/2012 @ 6:22 pmKnowing the behavior of Rauhauser, who is much like another character that Stacey has focused on, I wouldn’t be that sanguine, Who even two years after he was uncovered, he was still feeding lies to McGuinness, as well as other sources.
narciso (494474) — 6/17/2012 @ 6:39 pmIf Jews have no special ability to answer this question, then why not just ask any random person on the street, rather than specifically a random Jew? You clearly think Jews have some special insight into Sarah Palin’s jewelry choice. What special insight is that, and what gives them it?
Why don’t you spell it out, if you think you’re so smart?
Milhouse (42299c) — 6/17/2012 @ 6:51 pmhttp://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4243654,00.html
narciso (494474) — 6/17/2012 @ 7:58 pmJust got back from WI and can say the state is totally polarized.
Both sides believe the other is wilfully misinformed, has no data or reasoned argument and doesn’t listen except to pick their next point.
In that case Walker is the catalyst, naturally BHO is another but may I respectfully suggest their remain many other issues to divide us Right from Center, Right from Right, etc.
Just so you’re not blindsided, we do not have your back, GOP lovelies.
gary gulrud (dd7d4e) — 6/17/2012 @ 8:44 pmWell if I depended on the Wisconsin Journal, and other local papers, I’d be clueless too.
narciso (494474) — 6/17/2012 @ 8:52 pmExactly. But he doesn’t.
Milhouse (312124) — 6/18/2012 @ 1:02 amI told you it’s not special at all. Now quit playing dumb
— Yeah! Y’all are a buncha amateurs. What ya need to do is go pro, like our friend here. THEN yull be a-gittin’ sumwhere.
Icy (a3c527) — 6/18/2012 @ 2:14 amit’s been over 24 hours since she said the swattings had to stop and guess what? No new swattings!
good work, Sarah!
Comment by happyfeet — 6/17/2012 @ 5:11 pm
— Never you mind this one’s snark.
He’s just mad that Sarah hasn’t swatted him with a moose-leather whip.
Icy (a3c527) — 6/18/2012 @ 2:18 am“If Jews have no special ability to answer this question, then why not just ask any random person on the street, rather than specifically a random Jew? ”
But I didn’t say random Jew. I said “your Jewish friends.” Those words spell it all out.
sheldon (77ac66) — 6/18/2012 @ 5:01 am67. Well, Shelly, here’s the Cliff note version from another nutjob Christianist:
Genesis 12:2 “I will make you a great nation and I will bless you and make your name great inorder that you be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you and him who curses you I will curse.”
Hope that clears up just a smidge of your confusion.
gary gulrud (dd7d4e) — 6/18/2012 @ 5:59 amPatterico, dude, you aren’t being “SWATted”– you are being pranked.
wheelers.cat (44a7e0) — 6/18/2012 @ 6:04 amconservatives just don’t get popculture.
69. How apropos, autoeroticism earns the sixty ninth position.
gary gulrud (dd7d4e) — 6/18/2012 @ 6:08 amI think she may be ‘punking’ us, gary, when even honest progressives have given up the ghost.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/16/roberto-unger-obama_n_1602812.html
narciso (494474) — 6/18/2012 @ 6:15 am71. Victor Hugo “traitors always pay for their treachery in the end.” via one of my least favorites, Mirengoff, returned from the gulag.
Now that we are plainly in the home stretch, let us take care, lest we become traitor to Any who shall prove victorious at the end.
gary gulrud (dd7d4e) — 6/18/2012 @ 6:44 amSo you know Mattsky’s Jewish friends? How is that possible? I have no idea who Mattsky is, let alone his or her friends; is that another special spidey-sense you have? Do you know my Jewish friends too? What about my Taoist friends?
Milhouse (312124) — 6/18/2012 @ 11:58 pm