3/28/2012

20 Comments

1. Naturally this will be described in the liberal media as “a parliamentary ploy by Republicans” or “a move undertaken to embarrass the President.”

   Comment by JVW (15206d) — 3/28/2012 @ 11:44 pm

2. Really dodged a bullet with that squeaker.

   Comment by daleyrocks (bf33e9) — 3/29/2012 @ 12:06 am

3. 1. Did the Republicans line up Moochelle’s appearance on “Biggest Loser”?

   Comment by gary gulrud (d88477) — 3/29/2012 @ 12:09 am

4. “Obama Budget Defeated 414-0″

   I’ll bet it was that bit about $100,000,000 per year for Obama family vacations that was the sticking point.

   Comment by Dave Surls (46b08c) — 3/29/2012 @ 1:28 am

5. Missed it by that much!

   Comment by Maxwell Smart (0ad44c) — 3/29/2012 @ 2:09 am

6. Bipartisan!!

   Comment by dfbaskwill (ca54bb) — 3/29/2012 @ 6:35 am

7. Does anyone think that any previous president’s raw budget, if put to a vote, would have garnered zero votes in congress? Zero?

   The problem with this administration is that the president still thinks he is a senator.

   Comment by Amphipolis (b120ce) — 3/29/2012 @ 6:50 am

8. Obama Budget Defeated 414-0

   See? This is what I have been complaining about ever since my inauguration. Evil Republican obstructionists who block everything I do because they hate America want me to fail.

   Comment by Barack Obama (f90cc9) — 3/29/2012 @ 6:52 am

9. Racists

   Comment by JD (6a2c58) — 3/29/2012 @ 7:01 am

10. I take it that the other 21 members of the House of Representatives voted Present?

    Comment by John W (5ad83e) — 3/29/2012 @ 7:03 am

11. Just like Obamacare, it’s bi-partisan.

    Comment by AZ Bob (1c9631) — 3/29/2012 @ 7:10 am

12. Rats are deserting a sinking ship miserable cluster **** of a total failure. All those self-seeking losers, Republican and Democrat, know that anything they agree with Obama with will take their trough away. I wonder whether they will buy him out or disappear him.

    Comment by nk (dec503) — 3/29/2012 @ 7:10 am

13. Prior to President Obama, would you have believed that a president could go throughout his term without ever having passed a budget and still be looking to a possible reelection?

    Comment by MD in Philly (3d3f72) — 3/29/2012 @ 7:13 am

14. The elves are telling us that the stock and bond bull markets are done at the end of May. The CNBC can’t even call this a recovery anymore.

    Even with 1/4 of the Right writing in “FU DC” Urkel cannot possibly win.

    Comment by gary gulrud (1de2db) — 3/29/2012 @ 8:36 am

15. If Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi could not bring herself to vote for this, it must be really bad.

    Comment by Michael Ejercito (64388b) — 3/29/2012 @ 10:43 am

16. Unprecedented!

    Comment by PatAZ (3015aa) — 3/29/2012 @ 11:53 am

17. Crap, I bet Yes +442.5. At least I was colse.

    Comment by the bhead (a31060) — 3/29/2012 @ 1:07 pm

18. close…

    Comment by the bhead (a31060) — 3/29/2012 @ 1:08 pm

19. Nice math…+412.5

    Comment by the bhead (a31060) — 3/29/2012 @ 5:51 pm

20. The Obamessiah is soooo persuasive that he nearly was successful in seducing one member of his own party to vote for his budget.

    Well, almost !

    Seriously, if it hadn’t been for that Sarah Palin woman, or Bush, or Mitt Romney, then Obama would have received one vote for his budget !

    Comment by Elephant Stone (0ae97d) — 3/29/2012 @ 9:30 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.