Patterico's Pontifications

3/23/2012

Tommy Christopher Fails to Vet Nadia Naffe, 1: Crowdsourcing

Filed under: General,Nadia Naffe — Patterico @ 7:31 am

I had hoped to do a monstrous post today noting all the very odd aspects about Nadia Naffe’s story that Tommy Christopher ignored in his credulous reporting yesterday. But there are just too many, and I was tired last night and didn’t have time to compile them all.

So I will probably do that post over the weekend or on Monday. In the meantime, I am looking for some crowdsourcing. What odd aspects did you notice?

My post yesterday is a good place to start; I don’t need to hear those things repeated.

In a stream of consciousness here, these are the questions Tommy should be asking but is not:

  • Why did you tell a judge this was all not harassment?
  • Why do you claim the barn is remote when it is provably in a populated suburban area close to the street?
  • Why didn’t you call a cab, since you had a phone and were calling people?
  • Why do you say O’Keefe’s companion was brought to intimidate you and also say he was hiding?
  • What does it mean when you say O’Keefe “downloaded and/or linked his Gmail account to my device”?
  • Does that morally justify your publishing his emails?
  • Where are the Andrew Breitbart allegations?
  • Where is the evidence of a “rape plot”?
  • Why did you retweet Andrew Breitbart favorably in late 2011 concerning Occupy after the barn incident?
  • What changed in mid-February 2011 that made you turn on Andrew?
  • If you turned your back, how do you know O’Keefe stopped by your beer?
  • Why are you hurting innocent women who were allegedly done wrong by O’Keefe?
  • If you were given roofies, how do you remember so much?
  • How much did you in fact have to drink?
  • What do you think this is doing to your job prospects and what does that say about what’s really going on here?
  • Why are you cozy with Internet thugs?
  • Why do you say you retweet things so the FBI can get people’s IP addresses?
  • Do you realize how stupid that sounds?
  • Why do some of your friends claim it’s not you running the account?
  • Why do you tweet things to noted Breitbart hater @NicoleGennette?
  • Why did you make a snarky remark about Andrew’s heart attack on the day he died?
  • Why did you smear Patterico as a racist on Twitter when you knew it wasn’t true?
  • Did you publish your entire email to O’Keefe’s board of directors?
  • If you didn’t, why not, and what did you leave out?
  • Why do you say O’Keefe “stole” pictures of you from Facebook but “gave” you his emails because he supposedly checked them from your phone?

Just to name a few.

Surely you have some of your own!

UPDATE: A court has granted a temporary restraining order against Naffe’s releasing any further emails and ordered her to bring all copies in her possession with her to court.

UPDATE x2: I have the injunction and will post it when I get home. I can’t upload it from a phone.

UPDATE x3: The injunction is available here. Here is a screenshot of the relevant portion of the order:

You may have noticed that Naffe is now threatening to report me to the State Bar for this post, which is, she claims, “legal advice.” Because I point out holes in her story, she says, that constitutes “legal advice” to James O’Keefe in a civil matter. She also falsely accuses me of updating the post during work hours.

I have seen this playbook before, folks.

By the way: given Naffe’s admission that she accessed O’Keefe’s emails, evidently without his permission, has she committed a crime? I offer no opinion on that, as this post (like all my posts!) is written in my private capacity, as an exercise of my rights as a private citizen under the First Amendment. I do wonder, however, whether the authorities are going to be investigating her for accessing O’Keefe’s email without his permission.

249 Responses to “Tommy Christopher Fails to Vet Nadia Naffe, 1: Crowdsourcing”

  1. you would make a good lawyer I think

    happyfeet (3c92a1)

  2. I know what I’d like Tommy to confirm: that he himself has met with Nadia in person to confirm her authorship of every single tweet.

    Sarahw (b0e533)

  3. Just to name a few, ha.

    I agree, though, that Tommy’s verification of this story is absurdly premature and he should instead be interviewing her.

    I don’t suspect we will see Nadia do an interview on camera where good questions about her story are asked in real time. Shuster et al just don’t seem to want to do that either.

    Dustin (330eed)

  4. If you knew he taped Emma there, why would you go there with him alone, and get blind stinking drunk?

    How do you explain the 4648572628494726 differences between your testimony to the Judge and the nonsense you are spewing now?

    How do you explain the ever-evolving narrative?

    Could you give us directions to #rapebarn or #miscegenationbarn?

    JD (318f81)

  5. - if you had decided to leave, why did you stay and drink alone in the barn?

    - if you were so woozy you feel you were daterapedrugged, how do you know your panties were in the trunk of the car?

    -Why did you leave so many things behind, if you had been planning to leave for hours and hours?

    -Why is your spelling and grammar so bad if you are a Harvard grad student?

    MayBee (081489)

  6. This whole Naffe strawman really did the trick. We aren’t talking about Olby’s and Shuster’s denial of occurapes anymore.

    But this strawman was dismantled with Naffe’s own words. Screw these questions: she’s lying. There are at least a dozen documented rapes from Occupoop, and then you have a “I got drunk and the guy I thought was my friend refused to drop everything to drive my drunk ass to a train station.” There is no formal accusation of rape or attempted rape in the Naffe narrative. There’s a hint that at some point, she put herself into a situation where a lesser human could have had the opportunity to rape her. But opportunity does not equal intent.

    Just remember, rape doesn’t matter or even count if it’s committed by someone in the left. *cough*Clinton*uncough*

    Ghost (6f9de7)

  7. Anyone who says “per se” in a presidential speech or address is a g**-da** as*h**e, and you can quote me on that boys.

    Harry Truman (255b30)

  8. Sorry about that boys, Wrong thread. I really messed up on that one.

    Harry Truman (6451eb)

  9. Epic hissy fit from the gang at Media Matters coming in 3. . .2. . .

    MSE (a3f54e)

  10. - Why did you keep pictures of another woman in an intimate moment? Why not delete those, or give them to the woman you consider to be a victim?
    - How did you get the video, and have you discussed the situation with her? Did you get her permission to discuss it on Twitter (and elsewhere)?

    MayBee (081489)

  11. Is there any evidence your #trophypanties were found in the trunk of the car in which you were driven back to the train station or are you just making that up?

    Is Lila Rose confirming your smears of James O’Keefe or are you just making things up about his relationship with her?

    daleyrocks (bf33e9)

  12. How difficult is it to trip in a drunken stupor and accidentally download files from a computer to an external storage device, hypothetically, per se?

    daleyrocks (bf33e9)

  13. Were you lying then or are you lying now or both?

    daleyrocks (bf33e9)

  14. UPDATE: A court has granted a temporary restraining order against Naffe’s releasing any further emails and ordered her to bring all copies in her possession with her to court.

    SUHWEEEEEET !

    Colonel Haiku (df9857)

  15. Are you being paid for your tweets and blog posts or compensated in any other way?

    Have you ever taken a course in ethics?

    How often and how much do you drink? Do you have a problem with alcohol?

    daleyrocks (bf33e9)

  16. You know, I bet her phone has a gps, and if not, google maps and an internet full of cab companies was one workstation away. Also the android phones I’m familiar with light up. I use my iphone to navigate in the dark all the time.

    Also, it’s “pitch” black and guy number 2 is “hiding”? Maybe it’s just dark.

    Had she no means to buy her own damn fare/ ticket? Dark stairs is unlawful restraint? Not giving her free rides and tickets is unlawful restraint?

    Not actively removing her is unlawful restraint?

    Even I put a quarter in my shoe in case a date went bad -

    Sarahw (b0e533)

  17. Do you feel oppressed by the American legal system?

    daleyrocks (bf33e9)

  18. UPDATE: A court has granted a temporary restraining order against Naffe’s releasing any further emails and ordered her to bring all copies in her possession with her to court.

    SUHWEEEEEET !

    Comment by Colonel Haiku — 3/23/2012 @ 9:56 am

    Does she have to bring all electronic copies (all devices containing them) or just hardcopies?

    Sarahw (b0e533)

  19. We aren’t talking about Olby’s and Shuster’s denial of occurapes anymore.

    Ghost, that is an important story and I hope it isn’t lost in this furor over Nadia’s scheming.

    Unfortunately, I think the OWS movement is out of the Obama camp’s control at this point and will probably be quite ugly in November. I think we will be reminded of them.

    Dustin (330eed)

  20. - did she call her boyfriend, who has money, and ask him to purchase a ticket for her?

    MayBee (081489)

  21. That’s a good preliminary injunction. Court should definitely see what’s relevant before allowing her to do a massive (potentially irrelevantly embarrassing) document dump.

    Leviticus (9c986d)

  22. Maybee, the bing cache of her opus is 404ing. Do you remember who the boyfriend was? Cabana boys have been known to post things for other people. I was wondering if he or some other disgruntled boy might pinch hit for her.

    Sarahw (b0e533)

  23. Sarah- her boyfriend was a VP at HP, whited, with money. That’s what set James off, that someone else was miscagenating with her.

    MayBee (081489)

  24. That and her using the confederate flag as a rake, or something.

    Sarahw (b0e533)

  25. Would a person in law school (I think that’s the case) really behave the way she does if there was something to all this?

    I don’t buy it for a second.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  26. Not giving her free rides and tickets is unlawful restraint?

    Not forcing the Catholic Church to pay for free rubbers, abortions, and sterilizations is denying women access to womens reproductive health.

    JD (228f15)

  27. Why are you threatening to hang her and beat her with a rake?

    #miscegenationbarn

    JD (228f15)

  28. In the case of the law school, the students pay, not the church. But I get your point.

    Sarahw (b0e533)

  29. Why would a person in law school (again, that is my belief) really quote an internet troll on legal matters?

    Noodles (3681c4)

  30. Having a man waiting downstairs was witness tampering, too.

    MayBee (081489)

  31. Is she in law school or B school?

    MayBee (081489)

  32. Nadia Naffe ‏ @NadiaNaffe

    Thanks for letting me know Asst DA Patrick Fey/ @Patterico is giving O’keefe legal advice. I’m filing a CA bar complaint. @ElectMarcoRubio
    In reply to Rubio4President
    58m Nadia Naffe Nadia Naffe ‏ @NadiaNaffe

    Patrick Fey, aka @Patterico is a Asst DA at the Justice Dept & he’s giving O’keefe legal advice for a defense on his blog? @ElectMarcoRubio

    MayBee (081489)

  33. I think grad school is what is being claimed. MSW.

    JD (228f15)

  34. Strike the why on 29.

    Why is she not on TV promoting her blog? It seems she had trouble with momentum from the left.

    Why not go on Maddow or Current or something to get your story out there?

    Noodles (3681c4)

  35. Why do you pal around with Kneal Rowhowser, Ronnie Brinaert, and other Kimberlin acolytes?

    JD (228f15)

  36. Cheezit, Maybee. There’s some insanity or autism or dyslexia in this mix.

    Sarahw (b0e533)

  37. My guess on how she got into his email account.

    He uses her phone and laptop to send emails as she describes. He doesn’t close out the screen when he is done, and it leaves his username visible, but not his password.

    When she is alone with his computers back at the “barn”, she goes to GMail and finds that he has selected the “stay logged on” bypass for the password, and is able to go right into his account. She either has a thumb drive, or she links her laptop to his desktop and downloads his emails.

    shipwreckedcrew (97754e)

  38. Why do so many of her Tweets sound like they could have double meanings?

    I’ll quote the first one I see. Even her most infamous ones about Andrew are like this.

    Nadia Naffe ‏ @NadiaNaffe
    James sent pics of this poor girl to at least 3 dozen people, bragged abt her oral abilities @carrieslight @electmarcorubio @keitholbermann

    This could be taken a different way than it has been taken. Like she is a good debater.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  39. She is friends with Melissa Clouthier (there is a picture of them together) who was just mentioned as a top conservative tweet stream.

    I have seen no mention of Nadia from her. Has anyone asked her about Nadia?

    Noodles (3681c4)

  40. Nadia Naffe ‏ @NadiaNaffe

    Thanks for letting me know Asst DA Patrick Fey/ @Patterico is giving O’keefe legal advice. I’m filing a CA bar complaint. @ElectMarcoRubio
    In reply to Rubio4President
    58m Nadia Naffe Nadia Naffe ‏ @NadiaNaffe

    Patrick Fey, aka @Patterico is a Asst DA at the Justice Dept & he’s giving O’keefe legal advice for a defense on his blog? @ElectMarcoRubio

    Comment by MayBee — 3/23/2012 @ 10:39 am

    This fits with a pattern of what those people she is palling around with would do. And it is disgusting.

    JD (228f15)

  41. About TC’s coverage of her Part II I’ll say this – when I read it I didn’t get the feeling he was buying in hook, line, and sinker like he did in response to Part I. I think upon reflection he realized that some of the things she has written now do not jibe with the record she created in her written complaint and in her testimony.

    What is pretty clear in reading her stuff is that she is quite immature, and not terribly bright, Harvard notwithstanding.

    shipwreckedcrew (97754e)

  42. Patrick Fey, aka @Patterico is a Asst DA at the Justice Dept & he’s giving O’keefe legal advice for a defense on his blog? @ElectMarcoRubio

    Comment by MayBee —

    I’ve noticed something about Nadia’s comments.

    Her errors are unlikely errors. Like “you’re” is always “your” and her misspelling of Patterico’s name.

    Everyone makes typos, but it’s not normal for them to be repeated consistently.

    I think whoever is writing Nadia’s tweets for her has done this with so many accounts that he has to don a package of ticks. I guess the idea is this makes it seem more authentic, but it actually makes it look pretty fake.

    Why is she not on TV promoting her blog?

    Yes, I would like to see a video interview too.

    That Tommy Christopher vouching for this person already makes me worry that it’s a complete fraud again.

    Dustin (330eed)

  43. I’ve seen the pic, wondered if MC was the one vouching for NN.

    Sarahw (b0e533)

  44. That Tommy Christopher vouching for this person already makes me worry that it’s a complete fraud again.

    Comment by Dustin — 3/23/2012 @ 10:55 am

    Yep

    Sarahw (b0e533)

  45. This fits with a pattern of what those people she is palling around with would do. And it is disgusting.

    Comment by JD

    Yeah, it’s getting really old.

    It’s like clockwork. And they show who they are most afraid of.

    Dustin (330eed)

  46. Not one person from Project Veritas has come out to defend her or bad talk her.

    How is that possible?

    Has anyone interviewed Hannah Giles who is mentioned in the transcript?

    Noodles (3681c4)

  47. I don’t get the fraudulent tweeter thing. Is the real girl supposed to still be locked in the #soapbarn or something?

    MayBee (081489)

  48. I don’t think it is at all uncommon for the target of smears to not respond.

    JD (228f15)

  49. #rapebarn
    #miscegenationbarn
    #soapoperabarn
    #nadianaffeisaliarbarn

    JD (228f15)

  50. My guess is they are treading lightly and letting the injunctions do the work, noodles.

    MayBee (081489)

  51. If I had a friend that I believed was drugged for a possible rape I would not give two flying focks about the position of a guy like James is.

    A lot of these people don’t even work for him. Why would they not at least show support?

    The other way around is also true. If I believed she was lying I would be supporting him.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  52. Why did the injunction come so late in the game?

    Nothing makes sense in this thing.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  53. Not one person from Project Veritas has come out to defend her or bad talk her.

    How is that possible?

    Has anyone interviewed Hannah Giles who is mentioned in the transcript?

    Comment by Noodles

    There are two battles here. There’s a serious legal battle that O’Keefe is likely more interested in. Then there’s the day to day twitter harassment and smearing battle that I have learned the hard way is impossible to fight.

    Nadia’s been shown wrong, her claims baseless, so she comes up with more claims and the process begins again. It’s impossible for her to run out of lies.

    I don’t get the fraudulent tweeter thing. Is the real girl supposed to still be locked in the #soapbarn or something?

    Comment by MayBee

    hahaha. Sorry, that cracked me up.

    I admit it’s a pretty out-there theory.

    Dustin (330eed)

  54. I also suspect a lot of peole are treading lightly because of the real life personal costs people have incurred after crossing paths with Nadia’s new buddies.

    JD (228f15)

  55. Why did the injunction come so late in the game?

    The lawsuit was only very recently filed.

    JD (228f15)

  56. Perhaps he didn’t realize she had obtained his personal files, Noodles, until she started talking about it just lately.

    MayBee (081489)

  57. She has been talking about having his emails for a long time. A month maybe?

    Noodles (3681c4)

  58. I don’t get how it’s a far out theory Dustin. Three of her own friends have doubted it is her.

    She is linked on Twitter to a guy she says she does not know (who says he knows her and the she cannot be vetted).

    Noodles (3681c4)

  59. I also suspect a lot of peole are treading lightly because of the real life personal costs people have incurred after crossing paths with Nadia’s new buddies.

    Comment by JD — 3/23/2012

    That is hanging over this whole thing like a shadow. I hope that is explained soon in better detail.

    Nadia very publicly partnered with these thugs.

    Dustin (330eed)

  60. this Soap barn is the creepiest place on earth.

    SarahW (b0e533)

  61. Why has Nadia tweeted about almost every girl associated with PV and none of them have responded. Like Lila Rose.

    No one cares that she is out there telling stories about them?

    Noodles (3681c4)

  62. I don’t think many people know who Neal and company are. They really are legends in their own minds.

    Tommy quotes them though! haha

    Noodles (3681c4)

  63. I don’t get how it’s a far out theory Dustin. Three of her own friends have doubted it is her.

    there is a basis for it, yeah, but it’s hard to understand why Nadia would turn her twitter account over to someone and not pull the plug when they went too far.

    Dustin (330eed)

  64. @ Dustin 63

    Maybe, but you are putting a fake account into a context that might not be the correct one.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  65. Maybe it was never her account? Maybe it is her but she is acting so strange her friends don’t get it. Maybe it was phished? Maybe a lot of reasons.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  66. I don’t think many people know who Neal and company are. They really are legends in their own minds.

    Tommy quotes them though! haha

    Comment by Noodles — 3/23/2012 @ 11:17 am

    Problem is’ the people that do know who they are, and have seen the real life consequences of crossing paths with this evils cretinous scumbags know all too well who they are, and what they have done.

    JD (228f15)

  67. How come no journalist has gotten O’Keefe’s address and explained or shown the barn (ie google maps)?

    How hard could that be?

    Noodles (3681c4)

  68. Noodles- a court just ruled in O’Keefes favor, to keep Naffe from publishing the stuff she has. So apparently the judge and OKeefe have reason to believe it’s her.

    MayBee (081489)

  69. Maybe it was phished?

    If this isn’t Nadia, then Nadia has at least agreed to what’s going on here. It would be trivially easy for Nadia to announce this isn’t her. Unless she really is incapacitated, which is I assume is not the case.

    Dustin (330eed)

  70. So apparently the judge and OKeefe have reason to believe it’s her.

    Good point.

    Dustin (330eed)

  71. She must be behind it, but I have to think there is some personality disorder or mental illness also behind her awfulness.

    All the same maybe there is someone helping her out with tweets

    SarahW (b0e533)

  72. Noodles- a court just ruled in O’Keefes favor, to keep Naffe from publishing the stuff she has. So apparently the judge and OKeefe have reason to believe it’s her.

    Comment by MayBee — 3/23/2012 @ 11:26 am

    I haven’t been online very long. Is there a link to that?

    Noodles (3681c4)

  73. Noodles
    ^^^
    |||

    scroll up

    MayBee (081489)

  74. If this isn’t Nadia, then Nadia has at least agreed to what’s going on here. It would be trivially easy for Nadia to announce this isn’t her. Unless she really is incapacitated, which is I assume is not the case.

    Comment by Dustin — 3/23/2012 @ 11:26 am

    This is not true though. It wasn’t very long ago that her friends said this might not be her. Do we know if they contacted her? Maybe they have. But nothing has happened yet. Maybe her lawyer is looking at it? We have no idea. Maybe she is in Mexico for spring break? Lots of maybes.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  75. Maybe, do you mean this?

    UPDATE: A court has granted a temporary restraining order against Naffe’s releasing any further emails and ordered her to bring all copies in her possession with her to court.

    If so, I meant a link to the document.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  76. I think everyone at PV is keeping quiet on the instructions of the attorneys involved. SOP in situations like this is to not create anymore of a paper trial that will need to be explained later than already exists. We can see the path of destruction she has created for herself with her tweets — now she is the subject of a prelim injunction, likely granted in shortened time, which is highly unusual.

    Just like the matter involving Shuster — I’m 100% confident that had he still been at MSNBC, his copy would have never made it past legal and the editorial control that exists at a major news organization, even one as slanted as MSNBC.

    But at the low-budget outlet he has landed with, it seems like final editorial decision-making is with the morons that are going on the air, and you can see what happens when you give morons a camera and no one to watch over them.

    Naffe’s internet activity is in the same vein.

    shipwreckedcrew (97754e)

  77. Her alcoholic miseries, while as described are consistent with BAC of 1.5 or greater, would be exacerbated if she were taking meds affecting serotonin or dopamine.

    For someone expressing acute concern about her reputation, she has done a good deal to burn bridges and trash her credibility. She’s exaggerated, stolen, attempted to publicly embarrass innocents to harm her target…it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense even taken at face value.

    SarahW (b0e533)

  78. What’s your angle, Noodles?

    I’m done with trying to answer you on this.

    MayBee (081489)

  79. I can see poor Nadia coming home from a really relaxing spring break vacation and check her inbox and … eeeesh.

    Same thing happened to poor Rep Weiner. #hacked while watchin’ hockey.

    Amusing thought. I also admit I don’t see much sanity in Weiner’s choices. He had it made. I try too hard to understand folks who very well could just be screwed up upstairs.

    Dustin (330eed)

  80. I’m just asking if the injunction is online, Maybe.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  81. Nadia Naffe ‏ @NadiaNaffe
    I’m sad. Sad that @AndrewBreitbart spent his last days on earth defending someone who truly didn’t deserve it. @ElectMarcoRubio

    James is the one that didn’t deserve it. That is my angle.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  82. _______________________________________________

    very odd aspects about Nadia Naffe’s story that Tommy Christopher ignored in his credulous reporting yesterday

    These peculiar fights between the left and right, obscure by national standards, or in the matter of stories like the one involving that teenager killed in Florida, Trayvon Martin — nonsensically blown out of proportion by the MSM, thanks in part to the hype and propaganda of various liberals — never cease to amaze me.

    Generally, whenever arguments are occurring among people, invariably the most foolish or dishonest statements or supposed facts emanate from those who fancy themselves as being so compassionate, kind, wonderful, beautiful, generous, tolerant, heartfelt and sophisticated.

    [note: fished from spam filter. --Stashiu]

    Mark (411533)

  83. Is @ElectMarcoRubio practicing law on twitter without a license? Isn’t that illegal?

    daleyrocks (bf33e9)

  84. Please please please please please please please please do not identify me. My career would be ruined for having judgment sooooooooooooo bad to have dated Nadia Naffe.

    VP Person (58fa87)

  85. James didn’t deserve what, Noodles?
    Breitbart’s defense?

    MayBee (081489)

  86. #thatwouldbecareersuicide

    VP Person (58fa87)

  87. How come Nadia is not in the Harvard student/faculty/staff directory>

    Is she supposed to have attended at some point in the past? I might have misuderstood, I thought she was presently enrolled.

    SarahW (b0e533)

  88. I guess I only looked in the public directory. She could be in the internal directory and I don’t have access to that one.

    SarahW (b0e533)

  89. Any harvard folks about? :)

    SarahW (b0e533)

  90. @ Maybe 85

    Not the defense, he himself did not deserve the smear he was getting.

    There are countless statements made by her that can be read a different way.

    It is one of the reasons it all comes off so weird.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  91. Sarah, if she was a Harvard gal she should have a Boston address… when I searched all her addresses were in Florida.

    At least this doesn’t grow the tally of crazy Boston ladies again.

    Perhaps she meant a correspondence degree? She’s a graduate of a Florida university and Harvard has a popular online MBA program.

    Dustin (330eed)

  92. SaraW, you are going to have to use her real name.

    I don’t think it leads to Harvard.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  93. Noodles, her real name is Nadia Kolasa Naffe.

    Dustin (330eed)

  94. I’ve seen “located in Boston” in reference to Naffe. Now I’m curious.

    SarahW (b0e533)

  95. for example, when she left #Rapebarn and Penn Station, it was to return to Boston.

    SarahW (b0e533)

  96. Maybe she’s subletting.

    SarahW (b0e533)

  97. It is all performance art. The real life consequences, the smears of people, dishonest bar complaints, and much worse is what they are aiming for.

    JD (58fa87)

  98. There is another name also Dustin (someone else found it).

    I might be wrong about it not leading to Harvard. I suppose I should look it up again. Too much information in my brain.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  99. This shows her hanging out, at least in Boston. http://lockerz.com/gallery/2323531

    SarahW (b0e533)

  100. Noodles, SPILL IT. :)

    SarahW (b0e533)

  101. For some reason I thought it lead to a different college in Boston. But it was this…

    http://www.bostonypa.com/profile/NadiaMilhouse?xg_source=activity

    Noodles (3681c4)

  102. for example, when she left #Rapebarn and Penn Station, it was to return to Boston.

    Comment by SarahW

    That’s true.

    Maybe she’s subletting.

    Comment by SarahW

    Also a good point.

    And I had seen the Nadia Milhouse name, but thought that was a pen name. The Nadia Naffe name has a substantial paper trail after all.

    real life consequences, the smears of people, dishonest bar complaints, and much worse is what they are aiming for.

    Disagreeing isn’t enough for Neal. He’s gotta make sure people learn a lesson by having their personal life affected in terrible and unfair ways.

    Their target was Breitbart. Lee Stranahan said this, and he was right. But they will dig in and claw at anybody.

    Dustin (330eed)

  103. UPDATE x2: I have the injunction and will post it when I get home. I can’t upload it from a phone.

    Patterico (dc5c27)

  104. Why would Nadia dox a friend of hers to get even at James?

    She retracted,, but it was too late. Anyone can find pictures of the girl that saw that tweet.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  105. She retracted,, but it was too late.

    That is another of their patterns. They make the smear and make the attack and then ‘retract’ it once it’s out there. I don’t know if this is a serious effort to protect Nadia’s reputation (it’s idiotic if so) or if Nadia is just trying to be obnoxious (which is the most central of their patterns).

    Dustin (330eed)

  106. Comment by MayBee — 3/23/2012 @ 8:56 am

    -Why did you leave so many things behind, if you had been planning to leave for hours and hours?

    Could be she wasn’t planning to leave until she had destroyed one or more of his computers. But she wanted a reason for destroying the computers that didn’t involve hiding evidence of copying files off of them, so she made it out to be like she was really anxious to leave.

    -Why is your spelling and grammar so bad if you are a Harvard grad student?

    There could be a lot of reasons – what we need is samples of her earlier informal writing.

    Sammy Finkelman (e70ce9)

  107. Just an innocent question–is anything else possibly important going on and being ignored while folks are chasing their tails over the Nadia craziness?

    elissa (8a85cd)

  108. Quincy MA, huh?

    SarahW (b0e533)

  109. Shuster and Olbermann are being sued Elissa.

    Nadia is mentioned in the lawsuit, as far as I know.

    The most important thing happening centered around her is a lawsuit that could take down a few ‘journalists’ (at least their reputations).

    Noodles (3681c4)

  110. Elissa, pretty much anything else would meet that description :)

    SarahW (b0e533)

  111. My reaction to Elissa’s good question is that this is a proactive strategy to fight against the vetting of Obama. Such as that great Ben Shapiro post about Obama yesterday.

    BTW, Shapiro’s book, “Primetime Propaganda,” is a must read.

    Dustin (330eed)

  112. Comment by shipwreckedcrew — 3/23/2012 @ 10:47 am

    My guess on how she got into his email account.

    He uses her phone and laptop to send emails as she describes. He doesn’t close out the screen when he is done, and it leaves his username visible, but not his password.

    When she is alone with his computers back at the “barn”, she goes to GMail and finds that he has selected the “stay logged on” bypass for the password, and is able to go right into his account. She either has a thumb drive, or she links her laptop to his desktop and downloads his emails.

    The whole mention of the “device” (phone and/or laptop )may be a red herring.

    His username is identical to his email address so she would have had it if he ever sent her any email. Now he might have several GMail accounts, but 7 years worth of emails means a heavily used account.

    She didn’t need to do anything special to get his username – what she needed was his password – or a way to bypass the password.

    Sammy Finkelman (e70ce9)

  113. You know who likes mischief? James O’Keefe.

    You know else? Lee Stranahan.

    I have no further questions.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  114. Noodles,

    I don’t buy that.

    Dustin (330eed)

  115. True, that scenario could be wrong.

    How can this story go forward when Nadia has not been vetted?

    We can talk weird stuff all day, but it is all a mental exercise until that has happened.

    No right leaning blogger has really addressed any of this until this post.

    Sure seems odd to me.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  116. Nadia Milhouse pops up her and there – facebook, on http://www.meetup.com/Boston-Tea-Party/members/5710341/, and similar meetup groups. Residence: boston (Cambridge mostly)

    Where’s the “Milhouse” from?

    SarahW (b0e533)

  117. Liberty Chick posted last night on here about how the barn is no way remote.

    Do you think she didn’t know that a month ago?

    Noodles (3681c4)

  118. Noodles – nobody looked into it before because it was not out there, in this capacity, until now. That nobody vetted her before she went nutz and started making outrageous claims is nonsense. There was no reason to before now.

    JD (58fa87)

  119. noodles, what kind of mischief would either Lee or O’keefe be up to here? I can’t see that at all. It’s one thing to yank people around on a message board or twitter, quite another to abuse the courts.

    The usual suspects are happy playing around like that, but I don’t see any scenario where Lee or Okeefe would find that jake or even advantageous.

    SarahW (b0e533)

  120. Noodles, You mean Liberty Chick would have known a month ago?

    SarahW (b0e533)

  121. What about my comment at 109? Nothing advantageous?

    Shuster and Olbermann are being sued Elissa.

    Nadia is mentioned in the lawsuit, as far as I know.

    James was smeared as felon and as a possible rapist which her own transcripts dispute.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  122. @ Comment by SarahW — 3/23/2012 @ 1:21 pm

    Yes, and so would have many other people. People that know James. People that have been there. People who know where he lives. People in Jersey could find out easily I am sure.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  123. Clearly James is Nadia, smearing himself, filing charges against himself, and finding someone to get a lawyer and testify to a Judge. All to get Olbergasm and Shuster to lie about him.

    JD (58fa87)

  124. Yes, and so would have many other people. People that know James. People that have been there. People who know where he lives. People in Jersey could find out easily I am sure.

    Why in the world would anybody have even considered that before now?!

    JD (58fa87)

  125. It’s one thing to yank people around on a message board or twitter, quite another to abuse the courts.

    That’s right.

    They also threatened to take Patterico to the Cali bar over this post.

    They also said uncool sexual things about a named and completely external third party.

    They also insulted and attacked Breitbart soon after he died and could not defend himself.

    No, this is not a sting operation. There really are people out there conducting an attack that is easily seen as baseless.

    And remember, if this were a sting, then O’Keefe would lose his suit against Shuster because he has unclean hands.

    Dustin (330eed)

  126. nadia no-no
    don’t be nasty li’l Barn Ho
    and her mama cried

    Colonel Haiku (df9857)

  127. But Noodles, sure. I guess maybe I don’t understand what you mean by mischief. I though you meant faking accounts or filing injunctions in bad faith.

    SarahW (b0e533)

  128. I get the point of Noodle’s comments, though. Surely they can’t be serious. Surely they can’t be so stupid as to think this is good strategy.

    But apparently they are that stupid.

    Dustin (330eed)

  129. People can mock my theory. That is fine with me. It is not ironclad.

    However, I would like to see how anyone knows who is running that account. It is a fact that her friends think it might not be her. She denies knowing one of the friends she is linked to. Another strike against her is that Tommy has vouched for her. lol

    Seriously though, how does anyone know who is running that account?

    Noodles (3681c4)

  130. @ 124

    She first talked about rape barn on Feb 23.

    Almost a full month ago.

    Andrew himself was taking her on.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  131. I’m not trying to mock you Noodles. I just don’t agree with your theory and I worry that you’re going to set off some of the people who won’t appreciate being suspected of involvement with a scheme that has some really bad collateral damage.

    I know first hand that when people start casting those aspersions without enough basis, just because they are zealously seeking answers, it’s counterproductive.

    Seriously though, how does anyone know who is running that account?

    Comment by Noodles

    I’m not convinced she is. In fact, I’m suspicious. I know of one of her new pals who has boasted of running multiple sock accounts and using them to manipulate people.

    Dustin (330eed)

  132. Okay, I had a whole other comment I was going to post that disputes almost everything Dustin says in 125. But I won’t. I will stick to the who is running the account? argument.

    I know first hand that when people start casting those aspersions without enough basis, just because they are zealously seeking answers, it’s counterproductive.

    If we don’t know who is in fact running the account, isn’t this whole thread counterproductive?

    Noodles (3681c4)

  133. If we don’t know who is in fact running the account, isn’t this whole thread counterproductive?

    Comment by Noodles

    No, for two reasons. The account goes way back. It didn’t just pop up recently. It is Nadia Naffe’s account. She talks to her associates, such as Breitbart, with it.

    The other reason is that she is obviously aware of what this account is saying. This is at least obvious to me. And she’s not disputing it. The most natural assumption is that she’s actually writing it, but I’m suspicious of that. However even if she isn’t, she is permitting this stuff to be written under her name. She could easily email Breitbart’s folks, leave a comment use another twitter account, and announce this is not her.

    so I think that rules out that she’s been backed or similar theories.

    That leaves the theory that this is actually a clever ruse to expose some of the methods of Nadia’s new apparent friends. If that’s the case, that’s awesome, but I don’t think it’s the case just because of how far they’ve gone. Just my opinion.

    Dustin (330eed)

  134. so I think that rules out that she’s been backed or similar theories.

    I meant “hacked”.

    Dustin (330eed)

  135. So the judge issued an injunction against a fake person, obviously.

    JD (58fa87)

  136. Now Noodles, if it turns out that Nadia and Emma and O’Keefe and Lee (I’m not sure why you suspect he would be part of it, but OK) and the rest are actually coordinating this, sure, that will restore her reputation with a lot of people. It would be epic. But I’m not sure the judge would use that term.

    Dustin (330eed)

  137. This who is fake, who is real crap is exactly what happened during Weinertweet.

    JD (58fa87)

  138. I’ve decided I am done arguing about this. I am not mad. =)

    Alls one has to do is look at her most recent tweet. It is so stupid that idk how anyone could take her seriously. She is mocking them.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  139. I can’t upload it from a phone.

    Now c’mon! BE the technology.

    Erick Brockway (d8066f)

  140. It was more obvious who was fake in Weinergate.

    Nadia’s own history and own more recent actions are more in line with a real (if nutz) vendetta of disgruntlement.

    She’s capable of the tweetery, but I still think she might be getting help.

    SarahW (b0e533)

  141. Anyone else recognize this nonsense? Read the twits tweets.

    JD (58fa87)

  142. JD, that was pathetic.

    SarahW (b0e533)

  143. Nadia the tweeter is made of foolish.

    SarahW (b0e533)

  144. JD, yeah. I don’t think Patterico can discuss it here so I didn’t mention it, but it’s the exact same playbook. To the letter.

    Dustin (330eed)

  145. I don’t want to jump to any conclusions, but having read that injunction late last night, and considerng all the other known facts, I’m starting to suspect that Nadia Naffe might just be a thief.

    This is starting to sound like something that the authorities who deal with criminal matters need to start getting interested in.

    I’m not too keen on the idea of people going into my computer without my permission and downloading files that contain confidential legal agreements and whatnot, and then releasing them in an attempt to damage me. If that’s not against the law, it ought to be.

    And, I think there’s real good reason to believe that’s what’s going on here.

    Dave Surls (46b08c)

  146. hey Patterico!
    judges golf ev’ry Friday
    scooter out of juice?

    Colonel Haiku (5b963b)

  147. LA Times is right
    you should move much closer to
    place of employment

    Colonel Haiku (5b963b)

  148. As for Naffe (and Santa’s, for that matter) various complaints, they’re completely without merit, IMO.

    I see no substantiated claims of anything. Only unsupported accusations, and most of those aren’t actionable, anyway. And the few that are actionable, are only actionable because the law is often an ass, as are lawyers, judges, and juries.

    In a perfect world, a scumbag, like Santa would never be allowed to threaten someone with that breach/wrongful termination hogwash (or any of the other hogwash) in the demand letter her shyster sent out, after she’d agreed to the usual at will, on two weeks notice, employment condition. They’d go to prison for doing that under the extortion laws.

    Unfortunately, it ain’t a perfect world, and shakedown artists use the legal system to legally steal and extort, every single day of the week.

    Dave Surls (46b08c)

  149. Colonel – Judges can come in handy, when on a links vacation.

    Tim the tax cheat (44de53)

  150. Was noodling through some of’ the meetup groups Nadia Milhouse belongs to. One rather icky event she attended (paid ticket), Mar 1 of this year, is an ABC producer’s cattle call for a greasy reality show called “Glass House.”

    Just ick.

    NOW CASTING FOR THE NEXT GREAT UNSCRIPTED COMPETITION

    Do you HAVE to be the center of attention? Are you the person everybody WANTS at their party? Are you the type of person that is best described as “you either LOVE ME or HATE ME”? Would you like the chance to win $250,000 by defeating others like yourself in this mind-blowing competition show for ABC?

    We are currently on a nationwide search looking for dynamic, competitive, energetic and outgoing individuals to compete in a NEW and EXCITING reality competition show. You MUST be at least 21 years old to participate.

    SarahW (b0e533)

  151. 149… agreed, Tim, but the only “links” that interest me are Smokey Links®…

    Colonel Haiku (5b963b)

  152. It’d be funny if she sent her IDs to Tommy via Skype.

    koam @wittier (e39e6c)

  153. ^ heh

    Dustin (330eed)

  154. Tommy won’t say who “met” with her, or how.

    SarahW (b0e533)

  155. So I’m guessing the confirmation is second hand and/or electronic

    SarahW (b0e533)

  156. I miss happyfeet

    SarahW (b0e533)

  157. He does seem to have a problem with strong and courageous women,

    http://www.lifesitenews.com/images/sized/images/news/Stand_Up_Washington_Rose_Gi-580×406.jpg

    narciso (230268)

  158. Nadia Naffe is neither strong, nor courageous. She and her merry little band of hate-filled hooligans are festering pustules on the asscheeks of humanity.

    JD (58fa87)

  159. I didn’t mention Nadia, as my link made clear;

    narciso (230268)

  160. I know, I just just playing on your construct. My bad.

    JD (58fa87)

  161. Oh, there’s something courageous about putting on display, for the entire world, that you are that stupid.

    Maybe this is viral marketing for Yale?

    Dustin (330eed)

  162. UPDATE x3: The injunction is available here. Here is a screenshot of the relevant portion of the order:

    You may have noticed that Naffe is now threatening to report me to the State Bar for this post, which is, she claims, “legal advice.” Because I point out holes in her story, she says, that constitutes “legal advice” to James O’Keefe in a civil matter. She also falsely accused me of updating the post during work hours.

    I have seen this playbook before, folks.

    By the way: given Naffe’s admission that she accessed O’Keefe’s emails, evidently without his permission, has she committed a crime? I offer no opinion on that, as this post (like all my posts!) is written in my private capacity, as an exercise of my rights as a private citizen under the First Amendment. I do wonder, however, whether the authorities are going to be investigating her for accessing O’Keefe’s email without his permission.

    Patterico (feda6b)

  163. No I think Milbank, and co, have covered that angle,

    narciso (230268)

  164. I miss happyfeet

    I don’t miss the happyfeet who told me “fuck you.”

    Or the one who called Lila Rose a skank.

    I miss the other happyfeet.

    Too bad they’re all the same guy.

    Patterico (feda6b)

  165. Naffe has a history of nuisance litigation for profit and posing as a victim of discrimination. She is no conservative. She is a litiGATOR.

    #wheredagatorgarments?

    Colonel Haiku (5b963b)

  166. Hmmm. I don’t think @ElectMarcoRubio has tweeted (or at least he has not been retweeted) since Ron Byrnart noticed Neal tweeted “done” after NN asked @EMR to delete something he’d tweeted.

    Now there is a new foil. Surprise! He’s an anti-Breitbart guy. NN knew Breitbart, right?

    MayBee (081489)

  167. Same cast of characters as last time, MayBee.

    JD (58fa87)

  168. Oh my mistake. He’s back, unprotected.

    MayBee (081489)

  169. Hilarious. Now they’re claiming O’Keefe worked for me at the D.A.’s office.

    Luckily I caught Nadia making that claim. Add it to the list of lies.

    Patterico (feda6b)

  170. Hahahaha. Silly clowns they are.

    Think she’ll make the show cause hearing?

    SarahW (b0e533)

  171. Cause I think she should if that’s not too much practicing law.

    SarahW (b0e533)

  172. She’s a regular ‘Joan Flanagan’ can’t help herself.

    narciso (230268)

  173. Yeah, Nadia simply repeats, as fact, the assertions the psychos are making. Such as “breitbart unmasked”, a foaming Breitbart hater.

    Anything he says is gospel truth to Nadia.

    And Breitbart gave Nadia her second chance. Pretty sick lady.

    Dustin (330eed)

  174. Can I just say one more thing? I remember Starchild’s account started out by tweeting the Kardashians.

    MayBee (081489)

  175. She is just not right.

    JD (58fa87)

  176. She is Dr king and you are the Ku Klux Klan

    JD (58fa87)

  177. For those of you wondering it it is actually her, are the mistakes/mispellings in any earlier tweets you can read? Depending on how much she tweets you could read back 6 months or more…or maybe not.

    flicka47 (94db2d)

  178. You are all KKK because Nadia Naffe has horrific grammar, spelling, sentence structure, subject verb agreement, and overall writing skills. 

    JD (58fa87)

  179. I think we have to change the Billy Madison skit, it is no longer the zenith of inanity,

    narciso (230268)

  180. She is Dr king and you are the Ku Klux Klan

    Don’t you mean the “Klu Klux Klan”? She has called it that twice.

    Patterico (feda6b)

  181. More specifically, Naffe ain’t right in the head.

    Colonel Haiku (cac7c9)

  182. Now they are tweeting Atty Gen Harris demanding she investigate.

    JD (58fa87)

  183. @KamalaHarris Atty Gen Harris: Dist Atty Fey is inserting himself into a legal matter.
    He is a disgrace to his office & should be removed.

    JD (58fa87)

  184. Flicka, her tweets pull up as far back as March 8, 2011

    I noticed this:

    Nadia Naffe ‏ @NadiaNaffe
    Mr. Jobs you were a visionary. There won’t be anymore pain where your going. Rest in peace.

    From October 2011

    and

    Nadia Naffe ‏ @NadiaNaffe
    Back atcha babe :).. Haven’t seen you in eyons…

    From August 2011

    That tends to argue against my view that the ticks are forced.

    Dustin (330eed)

  185. Don’t you mean the “Klu Klux Klan”? She has called it that twice.

    Comment by Patteric

    Wow.

    Dustin (330eed)

  186. Careful. Kamala Harris is going to investigate you.

    JD (58fa87)

  187. I DEMAND TO KNOW WHAT SANDWICH ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY PURCHASED WITH TAXPAYER DOLLARS TO EAT ON HIS TAXPAYER FUNDED LUNCHBREAK. AND DID IT HAVE MUSTARD…

    THOSE LITTLE PACKETS COST TAXPAYER MONEY YOU KNOW

    SarahW (b0e533)

  188. Dustin, If I can think for a second I’ll remember the name of the twitter archiving service that lets you look up the entire history of activity on an account. If I can’t remember someone send up the Greg Beato signal…

    SarahW (b0e533)

  189. Patrick

    well, on top of that, the citizenry has a right to know what the laws do and do not say. So it is perfectly appropriate for any person to comment on what the law says, if only to inform the public. how can we rule ourselves if we don’t know what the law says?

    And likewise, as lawyers, we have expertise in the law that lay people do not. Why would it be wrong to share with the public our knowledge?

    That’s certainly what i have been doing in the trayvon martin case, on which i have a new post. you can click on my name and follow the link. Also at the site is a fun little friday frivolity.

    (Yes, i am pimping my blog. so sue me.)

    [note: fished from spam filter. --Stashiu]

    Aaron Worthing (73a7ea)

  190. You can look at tweets sent with pictures back to 2010. Kim Kardashian is an old fav. And the “your” is there as well.

    MayBee (081489)

  191. Sarah, Maybee, thanks. It’s helpful to see the “your” goes back like that. Not helpful to my theory, but helpful anyway.

    I think this is Nadia tweeting all this stuff. I was already kinda thinking it was just because it’s doing such a poor job that anyone who actually had experience smearing people would probably not be quite that bad.

    I do think it’s clear Nadia is in touch with a familiar crew of folks who guide her down a familiar path.

    Dustin (330eed)

  192. Kim Kardashian is an old fav

    This is weird.

    All these women in Boston, too.

    Weird.

    Dustin (330eed)

  193. N’s old private sector gig was in internet marketing, too.

    Thanks Maybee. DANG I used that arichive constantly six mos ago (and its name is just gone from my memory and my bookmarks)

    SarahW (b0e533)

  194. -Why do you apparently only have one friend on twitter
    -Where you really upset because Okeefe DIDN’T find you attractive enough to sexually pursue and being enraged developed the ‘rape plot’ to sooth your ego?

    Pamela (95126e)

  195. @KamalaHarris Atty Gen Harris: @NadiaNaffe is a victim of an attempted sexual assault by Dist Atty Fey’s fmr intern @JamesOKeefeIII

    JD (e5c06b)

  196. by 1 friend I mean @elecmarorubio …and he’s a Rubio impostor -type nonetheless…

    Pamela (95126e)

  197. JD, they actually amaze me. Even at this late stage, they actually amaze me.

    Dustin (330eed)

  198. It’s http://rs.research.ly/ I’m looking at tweets from 2 years ago now…

    SarahW (b0e533)

  199. #miscegenationisolatedfurnishedtrophypantyrapebarn

    daleyrocks (bf33e9)

  200. #freezingmiscegenationisolatedfurnishedtrophypantysuburbanrapebarnwithstairs

    daleyrocks (bf33e9)

  201. Fact: O’Keefe didn’t work for me. He did clerk for the D.A.’s office, for a different D.A. in a completely different office. Never met him, ever.

    Fact: they are now talking about my wife on Twitter. They believe she was the one who obtained the Nadia testimony. The reason for this is, when I first obtained it, I uploaded it to Scribd, thinking I had uploaded it to my account. Unfortunately, because my wife was logged in to her Facebook account, I was somehow logged into Scribd through her Facebook account — meaning that when I initially uploaded the document, it looked like it had been uploaded by my wife. (I don’t think she had ever used Scribd before; it was an account that was apparently automatically created because of the Facebook account.)

    I quickly corrected the error and uploaded the document to my account and changed the link on my blog. However, I apparently didn’t delete the document from my wife’s account. (I just did.) Now they are trying to make it sound like my wife is the one who uploaded the document, which is insane, but insanity never stopped them before.

    Anyway, just setting the record straight. I don’t particularly care to have my wife involved in all this, but naturally these people have tried to do that at every turn, because that’s what they do.

    Patterico (feda6b)

  202. @NadiaNaffe
    2 yrs ago (697 days)
    @cprater We have to be able to have a ‘discussion’ on race without being called a racist. Its too hard for whites to offer their opinions.

    So far, her bland tweets of old don’t much resemble @nadianow. Generally nothingburgers, some plugs for her blogs, insipid chat, and “nadia is doing x”

    SarahW (b0e533)

  203. That is their playbook. They are thugs. Nadia teamed up with these thugs at the very first chance. They all see to intimidate away dissent to improve their ability to smear.

    Dustin (330eed)

  204. @NadiaNaffe
    1 yr ago PostEffect
    RT @DLoesch: Sorry, I won’t be taking “advice” from liberal folks who think obsessive hatred & smears make for valid, journo content. #tcot

    RT irony

    SarahW (b0e533)

  205. Patterico- did you see this–

    In reply to Sheridan
    1h Sheridan Sheridan ‏ @OccupyRebellion

    @BreitbartUnmask @NadiaNaffe But look at the Scribd subscribers and there are family listed. I just saved everything.
    In reply to BreitbartUnmasked

    MayBee (081489)

  206. @NadiaNaffe
    1 yr ago
    I’m getting sick and tired of #MediaMatters pissing on @JamesOKeefeIII. He wasn’t charged with a felony. Eat your heart out! #biggovt #tcot

    SarahW (b0e533)

  207. Patterico, I am not a lawyer, nor am I asking for lawyerly information. But it seems to me if a person has a court order against them, ordering them to NOT release materials that may have been illegally acquired, and those people are also trying to smear other people at the same time…well, do not all these thing conflate together to a judge, speaking to their bona fides and honesty…and dare I say it…character?

    Simon Jester (f7e861)

  208. Patterico- did you see this–

    In reply to Sheridan
    1h Sheridan Sheridan ‏ @OccupyRebellion

    @BreitbartUnmask @NadiaNaffe But look at the Scribd subscribers and there are family listed. I just saved everything.
    In reply to BreitbartUnmasked

    I did. That is what I am talking about in the comment above.

    Patterico (feda6b)

  209. “Surely you have some of your own?”

    I do.

    Nadia, were you born a double-dealing backstabber, or is that a learned trait?

    Dave Surls (e97413)

  210. I, now, don’t like these blogfights just because they’re not fun. Nadia Nafee seems to me to be from the Harvard that’s in Hooterville, East Texas. (cf. Beverly Hillbillies, Season 1, Episode 2.) Don’t let us bring ourselves down to her level.

    On another subject, I think happyfeet was drunk. I met him, and he is a bit of a little shrimp without enough meat on him to absorb liquor.

    nk (dec503)

  211. OK. I just wanted to make sure you saw the thing about saving the info.

    xoxoxo

    MayBee (081489)

  212. So far, her bland tweets of old don’t much resemble @nadianow. Generally nothingburgers, some plugs for her blogs, insipid chat, and “nadia is doing x”

    Comment by SarahW

    Thanks, Sarah.

    Dustin (330eed)

  213. Okay this is a test to see if my comments appear or if i am stuck in the filters or something…

    [note: fished from spam filter. --Stashiu]

    Aaron Worthing (73a7ea)

  214. JD: She is Dr king and you are the Ku Klux Klan

    Don’t you mean the “Klu Klux Klan”? She has called it that twice.
    Comment by Patterico — 3/23/2012 @ 7:48 pm

    – Methinks she belongs to the Klueless Klucks Klan.

    Icy (b60639)

  215. “My guess on how she got into his email account.”

    Maybe the same way I got into my son’s account. My son borrowed my phone to check his mail and provisioned it with his email information not realizing that from that point forward I don’t *need* his password to access the account. I can just “check mail” and it logs me into the account and shows me the email.

    So my 10yo son doesn’t realize that every thing he sends and receives on his email account from the family computer now shows up on my phone.

    crosspatch (6adcc9)

  216. Had my son used a browser client to check the mail, it would be different. But he used the email client app on the phone and provisioned his account in the phone and it keeps that information persistently provisioned in the app.

    crosspatch (6adcc9)

  217. What is the ISSUE here???

    James O’Keefe and Nadia Naffe, had a parting of “company”.
    What has James O’Keefe been “accused” of?
    This crap is beyond ridiculous.
    James O’Keefe is James O’Keefe. He isn’t the messenge, he is sometimes the “messenger”. Nadia Naffe, is a very very low level politico…mover, and sometimes shaker.
    What is this entire HUB BUB, supposed to be about, and where is this supposed to end vis a vis, GOOD GUY vs BAD GUY (or girl).
    for Christs’ sake, in the end game, are we supposed to believe that James O’Keefe is no longer a credible source of ACORN or other LIBTARD GRAFT and CORRUPTION??
    I don’t care if James’ O’Keefe is the cleanest young dude of all time. It’s not about James O’Keefe. O’Keefe is an ambush journalist of sorts.
    Is there any suggestion that ACORN isn’t, wasn’t and will not again, be a DISGUSTING LIBTARD, CORRUPT CONCLAVE of LIBTARD LARGESSE??? For the love of GOD, why on EARTH, would the U.S. Govt, give a freaking DIME to corrupt LIBTARD orgs, like ACORN???

    Gus (694db4)

  218. One last thought Patterico friends. After this little episode, what will the next HIGHLIGHT of NADIA NAFFE’S life be?? 15 minutes of fame, come and go quickly. Trayvon Martin is being USED by Obama, Sharpton, Jerry Rivers and Jesse “illegitimate child Reverend” Jackson. This is all POLITICAL.
    The NADIA NAFFE nonsense, is part of an attempt to discredit, James O’Keefe and Breitbart.
    Nadia Naffe, has outlived her usefulness to any GOP or CONSERVATIVE ORG. She had attempted to attach herself and her GENDER and RACE to several GOP causes. She is a burnt out star.
    It’s sad and sickening, that my fellow CONSERVATIVE Brethren, DO NOT GET IT. There is nothing to talk about here. It’s all another SANDRA FLUCKTARD set up.

    [note: fished from spam filter. --Stashiu]

    Gus (694db4)

  219. I think it’s kinda cute that she imagines she’s MLK Jr. doing battle against the “Klu” Klux Klan.

    Cute in a psychotic sort of way.

    Dave Surls (46b08c)

  220. Gus, your D’ohbiden slip is showing.

    Icy (b60639)

  221. #dapantyeatin’barn

    Colonel Haiku (7f53f9)

  222. 213, 214. The days of Outlook are gone for home use. Once in a while I get a message attempting to email thru some website that my client app isn’t set up.

    Then I remember the pain of finding the latest route to the bowels of MS to set it up, the hassels of being out of sync between the local computer and the server, of losing access to emails from any other computer because they don’t exist in my inbox on the server,…

    gary gulrud (d88477)

  223. The Nadia Milhouse facebook page is no longer searchable.

    So curious.

    SarahW (b0e533)

  224. I see we are all protected from @nadianaffe’s twitter-stream silliness.

    SarahW (b0e533)

  225. I just want to say this, although I know I’m being obsessive-delusional.

    Via Prudence Payne, we see starchild’s first tweets.

    On Nov 11, 2010 Starchild tells the Kardashians she loves them
    On Nov 10, 2010 our girl was tweeting Kim Kardashian about a picture Kim tweeted.

    Now, I know a lot of girls love Kim Kardashian. I’m just saying, though.

    MayBee (081489)

  226. I don’t think you’re being obsessive or delusional, MayBee. The patterns here are strangely similar or this is an amazing coincidence.

    DRJ (a83b8b)

  227. If you looked through her stream (it is private now) she had more than a few tweets with Ali. It is not just the picture that is tied to him.

    This is one of the friends she denied knowing and the one who said that she could not be vetted.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  228. I see we are all protected from @nadianaffe’s twitter-stream silliness.

    It might be in our best interest.

    It is interesting though to see Nadia’s account now protected just two week’s after ElectMarcoRubio protected his account. Perhaps too many were getting too close…

    Dana (4eca6e)

  229. To me her Tweets showed she was not only a solid conservative but one that didn’t take any crap either.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  230. There was an interesting tweet from Dec 26 (going from memory here) that essentially states “Things to do in the New Year: Clean up my Twitter stream before I go public”.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  231. Maybee; Boston, crazy, and just the right age. I am….intrigued.

    SarahW (b0e533)

  232. Oh, you can still see all the tweets on research.ly

    SarahW (b0e533)

  233. That Ali’s timeline might be interesting if you go back to before the incident and after etc.

    He is like a professional Twitterer! His timeline almost broke my computer. =)

    Noodles (3681c4)

  234. Maybee – Lee did say this:

    About the ‘women from Boston.’

    I’ve spoken to the woman who told me she was Jennifer George on the phone for about 20-30 minutes.

    I’ve spoken to Nadia Naffe on the phone for more than an hour.

    They didn’t sound anything alike.

    However, at the time he said JGMA’s accent sounded put-on, that electronic voice altering might have been employed; and as a group effort is possible, it’s reasonable to speculate another person might have been used to make the calls to Lee.

    SarahW (b0e533)

  235. Going through O’keefe’s pictures is interesting also.

    Nothing major in there (that I found) except you do get a glimpse of his interactions with some of the girls.

    They are actually kind of sweet. Young love type stuff (idk that to be the case but that’s what it looks like).

    Noodles (3681c4)

  236. Maybee, any Lopez love? I hadn’t noticed it…but will go looking.

    SarahW (b0e533)

  237. —Sorry about that boys, Wrong thread. I really messed up on that one.

    That’s OK Harry, give ‘em hell!

    Red (7b5f67)

  238. New post, with a document from Nadia’s suit against the RNC. Apparently she intentionally kept the laptop they had given her, even after she was fired and instructed to return it. Details here.

    Patterico (feda6b)

  239. “I see we are all protected from @nadianaffe’s twitter-stream silliness.”

    I suspect her attorney might have something to do with that. She’s said a whole lot of stuff, that she shouldn’t have ought to said.

    Dave Surls (46b08c)

  240. Yeah, I’m still curious whether she broke the law by accessing O’Keefe’s emails without his permission.

    My guess is that she is being reported for this, and we’ll find out. But it’s just a guess.

    Patterico (feda6b)

  241. This is weird, and I am not saying this means anything, but that Izzysantino YT channel I just linked showed it was last active yesterday.

    Now, 40 minutes after that it only shows the date joined as the last active (Oct 30, 2007). That means they just set that to private. I can also not read their channel comments now.

    I only linked it because James had favorited a video of theirs and the link to the name Izzy Santa. Of course that doesn’t necessarily mean that’s her account but I found it odd.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  242. Wait, I can read the comments now. Idk what is going on there.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  243. This account just popped up on Larry O’connor’s Twitter if any wants to poke around.

    http://twitter.com/#!/izzy68

    Noodles (3681c4)

  244. Happy Friday to my BFF the Bayou Avenger. You know who you are. :)

    I wonder if she is talking about one of the Mary Landrieu sting people in this tweet?

    Noodles (3681c4)

  245. Idk if that is the right Izzy, some if it seems right but it kind of seems wrong also.

    If it is, she is not following or being followed by Nadia or James (I scanned pretty quickly but that seems to be the case).

    There is something about this whole Izzy Santa/love boat thing that seems odd to me.

    Obviously something went wrong, but idk if what went wrong is what we know about it.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  246. Caleb Howe ‏ (re-tweeted) Feb 2
    Not liking subtle gun control canards coming from repubs in #fastandfurious hearing. Reminder: Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.

    Nadia Naffe ‏ @NadiaNaffe April 12
    Sanford Police Dept. devalued Trayvon Martin’s life for 45 days. A child killer roamed free, while racists rallied around him

    She seems to have done a 180 on gun rights in a few months. Sure there are Dave Surls in the world, but most gun supporters do not care about the race aspect of this story and don’t believe this was murder.

    As an African American conservative Nadia would surely be aware of how the media spins stories on race etc. Do you think she believes Caleb is a racist? (note: I am assuming he is supporting Zimmerman)

    I find this all rather odd.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  247. **I checked Caleb’s stream and idk if he is “pro Zimmerman” but he is for sure fighting back against the media narrative.

    AndrewBreitbart ‏ (re-tweeted) Nov 28
    Today on @Toure’s ‘That Broccoli is Racist: What Happens When The Broccoli IS Racist!’ Dems again pass over key black for leadership!

    I think it’s safe to say she sees the humor in mocking people that think everything is racist.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  248. If you read her Twitter stream, there is no doubt she is a solid conservative (even after the rumored incident).

    She is also obviously against OWS.

    How does someone seemingly change their political beliefs so quickly? It doesn’t add up.

    Noodoes (3681c4)


Powered by WordPress.

Page loaded in: 1.0156 secs.