I was able to rea d some more of this. I see now:

1) James O’Keefe called it a barn according to Nadia Naffe – that’s where the word coms=es from – although he also called it an office.

2) She was going to stay there during filming, or he wanted her to – and that means for days.

3) She claims she got scared – screamed – when she saw the second person for the first time when O’Keefe came back.

4) I can’t understand the issue with the credit card, or the money that night. What was the money needed for?

5) She says she was indeed driven to Penn Station in New York and she doesn’t give the name of the Newark train station – which was probably also called Penn Station. Maybe somebody got confused as to where to take her.

6) She thinks that when somebody is on probation, they are on parole. She used the word parole twice. But also probation.

7) She claimed his movements were limited to Westwood, but that may have been for legal reasons, so she would have a claim. I think the limitation was the state of New Jersey and if it was Westwood, then he would have been breaking “parole” to pick her from the train station which was in Newark. She says the original intention when O’Keefe came with another man probably was to try to talk her into staying the night – there weer no plans to take her somewhere where she could go back to Boston. That was imrprovised she thought – it had not been discussed between O’Keefe and the other man before

8) She says she started ignoring him and called somebody unspecified on the phone and then he stormed out. She does not get into the substance of the argument at all except that it was when they were discussing the project.

9) In addition to the wireless mouse and the panties, a USB connector and a scarf were also missing, but James only offered to return the wireless mouse. Later, he offered money, she claims not to know for what and why.

10) She claims that James started accusing her later of maybe trying to pull a sting on him and posted something to warn people about her, which he took down later. That maligning of her is the harassment she is complaining about.

Sounds like she’s copping to making terroristic threats under New Jersey statutory law. That happens to be a felony offense, btw. She might be able to beat the rap by claiming that she wasn’t threatening to destroy his computers in a violent way…but, I don’t think I’d care to make that argument in court.

Making statements like that, is probably not the smartest thing to do, especially when you’re filing bogus criminal complaints in front of a judge in New Jersey.

Aside from being a lowlife, I don’t think she’s the sharpest pencil in the box. But, you would think her attorney would have told her to tone it down.

For one thing, it’s a she, not a he.

For another, I don’t know how anyone without FBI contacts can know that she was actually raided, vs. merely claiming she was.

Because she’s trying to do the same thing, lots of allegations with no probably cause to back them up.

Anyway, though rather horrified & pissed off, I just started reading his tweets. It’s all there in black & white.

I’ve read back to March 1st so far … dude’s mentally deranged. I blocked him a couple hours ago (even tho it’s probably too late since the feds have his systems, but should I unblock & follow just in case?

If he doesn’t read this blog (or if no one tips him off) he’ll have no idea I’m onto him now.

Thoughts?

I know for a fact that Anon slimeball @OccupyRebellion (obsessed w taking ‘Breitbots’ down) was raided this week by the FBI.

I’d like to know more about that. How do you know that for a fact? Thanks

A few minutes later I logon to Twitter & a link by @RBPundit sends me here. I feel awful that @OccupyRebellion could have been using my acct to spy on #TeamBreitbart. Ugg, makes me feel sick! Stupid POS. I’m one of Breitbart’s most ardent & loyal supporters. The entire team means the world to me.

If there is anything at all, large or small that I can do to help, please let me know. Also, do you think it’s too late to follow him back, now that he’s been busted? Or should I go ahead & do it anyway. He’s made a few posts from friend’s systems since the raid, or so he says…

I can’t wait to read the barn story, and see how it interfaces with her testimony. And her tweets. And the insinuations about the barn story in Part 1.

Comment by Patterico

She’s been promising this story for ages now. The reason she’s taking forever is because it’s not going to be easy to make all the lies line up with the other lies.

In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if she just keeps promising the story indefinitely.

It seems her real goal is to claim she’s an accomplice to someone she wants to make clear is horrible. But all she’s admitting is that she was a criminal wire tapper. I don’t know that O’Keefe was, after all… just that Nadia wanted to be one.

Holy God. 

So he refused to head back to some drunk chick who couldn’t even keep track of her panties and drive her to some train station so she could pass out there? Instead, he wanted her safe and sound at a well-equipped room at his parents’ place while he got some work done? The kind of work he’s known to be passionate for, that she bailed out on, preferring instead to lose her panties, alone, at his folks’ place?

Ha ha. I’d have done the same thing to the drunken souse. He probably brought a frriend back with him just so she wouldn’t accuse him of rape and, if so, good call. 

Then she brings forth the weakest harassment case in the history of harassment cases against him in the wrong jurisdiction?

Ha ha ha. What a skank. 

Keith Olbermann and David Shuster lost the minimal respect I might have had for them for their blatant lying slanderous distortions against O’Keefe. I hope they get they get their asses sued and their reputations ruined. More.

All this and this stalwart conservative blogger, Nadia Naffe, is hanging with “Anonymous” and Occuopy Wall Street?

Yeah I’m sure she was legit. No Moby there. 

Now on to the video: in context, it wouldn’t be as bad as I thought. Still pretty stupid, but at the same time … stupid FUNNY!

If O’Keefe (or his mom or dad) later found her panties laying around, with her wireless mouse, no doubt both a little recently wetted and dried during whatever conversation she had chatting with whomever guy she just met or knew online in between begging O’Keefe to come back to her and threatning to break his computers when he resisted her demands, initially thinking better of it … I hope they were both picked up with with tongs or rubber gloves, and quickly sealed in a Ziploc bag before being thrown away so they didn’t catch anything, and also to protect themselves from the general “ickiness” of the remnants of such a girl!