<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weinergate: Five Is Not Two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2011/06/11/weinergate-five-is-not-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2011/06/11/weinergate-five-is-not-two/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:52:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Icy Texan</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2011/06/11/weinergate-five-is-not-two/comment-page-7/#comment-805198</link>
		<dc:creator>Icy Texan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=60203#comment-805198</guid>
		<description>tifosa, any time that you want to respond point by point, and actually engage in a discussion, feel free. I &quot;countered&quot; you with both facts and opinion. Step up and do the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tifosa, any time that you want to respond point by point, and actually engage in a discussion, feel free. I &#8220;countered&#8221; you with both facts and opinion. Step up and do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tifosa</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2011/06/11/weinergate-five-is-not-two/comment-page-7/#comment-805093</link>
		<dc:creator>tifosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=60203#comment-805093</guid>
		<description>Yeh kinda scary...no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeh kinda scary&#8230;no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SPQR</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2011/06/11/weinergate-five-is-not-two/comment-page-7/#comment-805056</link>
		<dc:creator>SPQR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=60203#comment-805056</guid>
		<description>Still trolling this thread, tifosa.  How creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still trolling this thread, tifosa.  How creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2011/06/11/weinergate-five-is-not-two/comment-page-7/#comment-805054</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=60203#comment-805054</guid>
		<description>You are rather pathetic and transparent, &quot;tifosa&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are rather pathetic and transparent, &#8220;tifosa&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tifosa</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2011/06/11/weinergate-five-is-not-two/comment-page-7/#comment-805053</link>
		<dc:creator>tifosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=60203#comment-805053</guid>
		<description>Is Breitbart pressing charges?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Breitbart pressing charges?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2011/06/11/weinergate-five-is-not-two/comment-page-7/#comment-805051</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=60203#comment-805051</guid>
		<description>Is there some new logical fallacy for &#039;criticism&#039; against democrats, Tifosa?  I don&#039;t think Icy Texan or anyone else needed your help to figure out he is criticizing you.  And I don&#039;t think anyone minds.

Weiner&#039;s behavior rises to expulsion level because he lied to the American people in a way that framed innocent people for crimes like hacking.

At any rate, it was really insane to compare Weiner&#039;s absolute degenerate behavior, from the Cordova penis .jpg to the gagging comments to the very young women to the porn stars to the gym picture that indicates he was playing with himself in public to lord knows what else.  He&#039;s mentally disturbed. 

Gingrich?  He cheated on his wife.  Very bad.  But also very common.  The only people who act like Weiner did are totally damaged.  He preys on weak minded idiots who call married men &quot;boyfriend&quot;.  Even Bill Clinton is disgusted with this piece of garbage.

Tifosa&#039;s writing style is very peculiar, isn&#039;t it? 

Anyway:
&lt;blockquote&gt;REP. WEINER: I apologize to Andrew Breitbart, I apologize to the many other members of the media that I misled. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

What a freaking loser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there some new logical fallacy for &#8216;criticism&#8217; against democrats, Tifosa?  I don&#8217;t think Icy Texan or anyone else needed your help to figure out he is criticizing you.  And I don&#8217;t think anyone minds.</p>
<p>Weiner&#8217;s behavior rises to expulsion level because he lied to the American people in a way that framed innocent people for crimes like hacking.</p>
<p>At any rate, it was really insane to compare Weiner&#8217;s absolute degenerate behavior, from the Cordova penis .jpg to the gagging comments to the very young women to the porn stars to the gym picture that indicates he was playing with himself in public to lord knows what else.  He&#8217;s mentally disturbed. </p>
<p>Gingrich?  He cheated on his wife.  Very bad.  But also very common.  The only people who act like Weiner did are totally damaged.  He preys on weak minded idiots who call married men &#8220;boyfriend&#8221;.  Even Bill Clinton is disgusted with this piece of garbage.</p>
<p>Tifosa&#8217;s writing style is very peculiar, isn&#8217;t it? </p>
<p>Anyway:</p>
<blockquote><p>REP. WEINER: I apologize to Andrew Breitbart, I apologize to the many other members of the media that I misled. </p></blockquote>
<p>What a freaking loser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tifosa</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2011/06/11/weinergate-five-is-not-two/comment-page-7/#comment-805050</link>
		<dc:creator>tifosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=60203#comment-805050</guid>
		<description>Aww, IcyTexan, I&#039;m flattered. When you couldn&#039;t countered with facts, you countered with criticism. Sweet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aww, IcyTexan, I&#8217;m flattered. When you couldn&#8217;t countered with facts, you countered with criticism. Sweet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Icy Texan</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2011/06/11/weinergate-five-is-not-two/comment-page-7/#comment-803491</link>
		<dc:creator>Icy Texan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 05:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=60203#comment-803491</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Comment by tifosa&lt;/b&gt;
79. &lt;i&gt;Here’s my take on Weiner, from the left side: the behavior is indefensible, disgusting, immoral. So far not illegal.&lt;/i&gt;
-- And it matters whether or not this activity was illrgal WHY?

80. &lt;i&gt;On the scale, Gingrich did WORSE and he’s a candidate for presidency on the right!!&lt;/i&gt;
-- First, WHY are you bringing up Gingrich in a discussion about Weiner? Second, I wasn&#039;t aware that Gingrich has EVER had inappropriate contact with a &lt;b&gt;17 year old&lt;/b&gt;. Third, read Patterico&#039;s response to your silliness. 

82. &lt;i&gt;imo whether he stays or goes is the choice of HIS ELECTORATE!&lt;/i&gt;
-- IMO, your O has nothing to do with either the Constitution or the Rules of Congress . . . or reality.

86. &lt;i&gt;So you think he should be ousted from the House, regardless of what the voters want?&lt;/i&gt;
-- Not necessarily &quot;ousted&quot;. Especially when &quot;pressured to resign&quot; sounds so much more funner!

92.&lt;i&gt;Censured, maybe…&lt;/i&gt;
-- Remember &lt;b&gt;which&lt;/b&gt; party controls the House.

95. &lt;i&gt;This is CLEARLY ideologically driven, not a sincere desire to “clean house.”&lt;/i&gt;
-- You don&#039;t think that getting rid of Weiner would be a step towards cleaning &#039;House&#039;? Or &quot;draining the swamp&quot;?

113. &lt;i&gt;What Weiner did was vile, inexcusable, disgusting, and demeaning to the office of a Senator, much less a man.&lt;/i&gt;
-- So you ARE capable of making a reasonable comment (as long as one overlooks the slightly important factoid that Weiner is NOT a Senator). Well then, maybe your next one will be reasonable as well.

&lt;i&gt;I personally think that he should do what the majority of his electorate want him to do.&lt;/i&gt;
-- Yeah, I didn&#039;t think you were up to two-in-a-row either. Uh, see here, genius; what if his electorate wants him to continue to be &quot;vile, inexcusable, disgusting, and demeaning to the office&quot;? Is that okay?

125. &lt;i&gt;The hypocrisy is the R’s calling for him to resign!&lt;/i&gt;
-- So all of the D&#039;s calling for his resignation are okay in your book?

141. &lt;i&gt;as a Dem, I HOPE he resigns. But does it rise to expulsion? no&lt;/i&gt;
-- Unfortunately, you are correct. Teddy Aquanaut raised the bar incredibly high on that one a long, long time ago.

145. &lt;i&gt;It’s a National disgrace that Americans go overseas and bash the president,&lt;/i&gt;
-- Yeah! Bring back the Bush years, when people did all of their bashing in-country!

&lt;i&gt;it’s a National disgrace that for two years, and beyond, people clammer for a birth certificate,&lt;/i&gt;
-- Right there on a par with 400 years of slavery, innit?

&lt;i&gt;it’s a National disgrace that the Repubs give aid and comfort to Gaddaffi.&lt;/i&gt;
-- Oh dear Lord! What ARE you babbling about now?

&lt;i&gt;Guess we’re used to it.&lt;/i&gt;
-- Used to National disgraces? You should be. YOU elected them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Comment by tifosa</b><br />
79. <i>Here’s my take on Weiner, from the left side: the behavior is indefensible, disgusting, immoral. So far not illegal.</i><br />
&#8211; And it matters whether or not this activity was illrgal WHY?</p>
<p>80. <i>On the scale, Gingrich did WORSE and he’s a candidate for presidency on the right!!</i><br />
&#8211; First, WHY are you bringing up Gingrich in a discussion about Weiner? Second, I wasn&#8217;t aware that Gingrich has EVER had inappropriate contact with a <b>17 year old</b>. Third, read Patterico&#8217;s response to your silliness. </p>
<p>82. <i>imo whether he stays or goes is the choice of HIS ELECTORATE!</i><br />
&#8211; IMO, your O has nothing to do with either the Constitution or the Rules of Congress . . . or reality.</p>
<p>86. <i>So you think he should be ousted from the House, regardless of what the voters want?</i><br />
&#8211; Not necessarily &#8220;ousted&#8221;. Especially when &#8220;pressured to resign&#8221; sounds so much more funner!</p>
<p>92.<i>Censured, maybe…</i><br />
&#8211; Remember <b>which</b> party controls the House.</p>
<p>95. <i>This is CLEARLY ideologically driven, not a sincere desire to “clean house.”</i><br />
&#8211; You don&#8217;t think that getting rid of Weiner would be a step towards cleaning &#8216;House&#8217;? Or &#8220;draining the swamp&#8221;?</p>
<p>113. <i>What Weiner did was vile, inexcusable, disgusting, and demeaning to the office of a Senator, much less a man.</i><br />
&#8211; So you ARE capable of making a reasonable comment (as long as one overlooks the slightly important factoid that Weiner is NOT a Senator). Well then, maybe your next one will be reasonable as well.</p>
<p><i>I personally think that he should do what the majority of his electorate want him to do.</i><br />
&#8211; Yeah, I didn&#8217;t think you were up to two-in-a-row either. Uh, see here, genius; what if his electorate wants him to continue to be &#8220;vile, inexcusable, disgusting, and demeaning to the office&#8221;? Is that okay?</p>
<p>125. <i>The hypocrisy is the R’s calling for him to resign!</i><br />
&#8211; So all of the D&#8217;s calling for his resignation are okay in your book?</p>
<p>141. <i>as a Dem, I HOPE he resigns. But does it rise to expulsion? no</i><br />
&#8211; Unfortunately, you are correct. Teddy Aquanaut raised the bar incredibly high on that one a long, long time ago.</p>
<p>145. <i>It’s a National disgrace that Americans go overseas and bash the president,</i><br />
&#8211; Yeah! Bring back the Bush years, when people did all of their bashing in-country!</p>
<p><i>it’s a National disgrace that for two years, and beyond, people clammer for a birth certificate,</i><br />
&#8211; Right there on a par with 400 years of slavery, innit?</p>
<p><i>it’s a National disgrace that the Repubs give aid and comfort to Gaddaffi.</i><br />
&#8211; Oh dear Lord! What ARE you babbling about now?</p>
<p><i>Guess we’re used to it.</i><br />
&#8211; Used to National disgraces? You should be. YOU elected them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SPQR</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2011/06/11/weinergate-five-is-not-two/comment-page-7/#comment-803414</link>
		<dc:creator>SPQR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=60203#comment-803414</guid>
		<description>Bartowski, of course not.  The troll&#039;s claims were all fabricated.  As usual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bartowski, of course not.  The troll&#8217;s claims were all fabricated.  As usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Bartowski</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2011/06/11/weinergate-five-is-not-two/comment-page-7/#comment-803412</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Bartowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=60203#comment-803412</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20002125-503544.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Top Republicans in Nevada called for Ensign&#039;s resignation&lt;/a&gt;

So did &lt;a href=&quot;http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2009/06/23/47196/hannity-ensign-resign/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hannity&lt;/a&gt;

So, it&#039;s not like Ensign&#039;s affair was ignored by prominent Republicans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20002125-503544.html" rel="nofollow">Top Republicans in Nevada called for Ensign&#8217;s resignation</a></p>
<p>So did <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2009/06/23/47196/hannity-ensign-resign/" rel="nofollow">Hannity</a></p>
<p>So, it&#8217;s not like Ensign&#8217;s affair was ignored by prominent Republicans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->