Patterico's Pontifications

4/1/2011

New York Times Punked Again?

Filed under: General — Patterico @ 4:00 am

That is . . . yet again?

If you have been paying attention in the past, you may have noticed that the venerable New York Times has been totally punked more than once on past April Fool’s Days.

So you would think they would be especially careful not to let that happen again. Wouldn’t you?

I’d direct you over to the New York Times Web site, but I’m afraid they’re now behind a pay wall. So you’ll have to get the story from Ted Frank.

28 Comments

  1. Well, someone’s getting punked…

    Comment by Sam Paris (f6fe05) — 4/1/2011 @ 4:23 am

  2. I can access The New York Times with no problems, and I’m not a subscriber.

    Comment by The Dana who uses nytimes.com (3e4784) — 4/1/2011 @ 4:33 am

  3. Can’t believe they fell for that. Even if they weren’t suspicious from the word ‘go’, you’d think they’d have caught on as things developed…

    Comment by D (43a3c4) — 4/1/2011 @ 5:17 am

  4. heh heh

    Comment by meep (97797a) — 4/1/2011 @ 5:25 am

  5. Dude, the last and most important link is broken. It should be http://centerforclassactionfairness.blogspot.com/2011/04/april-fools-day-and-new-york-times.html

    Comment by Mark Draughn (fa5413) — 4/1/2011 @ 5:52 am

  6. God damnit, you bloggers.

    Comment by Scott Jacobs (d027b8) — 4/1/2011 @ 6:46 am

  7. Mark Draughn,

    Thanks. Link is now fixed.

    Comment by Patterico (c218bd) — 4/1/2011 @ 6:48 am

  8. Very well done.

    Comment by Dustin (c16eca) — 4/1/2011 @ 7:25 am

  9. Very elaborate, Patrick. Well done.

    Comment by PatHMV (49d120) — 4/1/2011 @ 7:30 am

  10. Quite irritating.

    Comment by ManlyDad (060305) — 4/1/2011 @ 7:40 am

  11. hey, blawgers, why r u giving the NYtimes the run around.
    it stupid
    you people should be ashamed

    Comment by V (cf1439) — 4/1/2011 @ 8:16 am

  12. Well, it’s not surprising. Some people are very gullible.

    Comment by Aj4coco (d7e45f) — 4/1/2011 @ 8:19 am

  13. Nicely done. It took me two links to figure it out.

    Comment by aunursa (a2a019) — 4/1/2011 @ 8:40 am

  14. Much pain be upon you today, Patterico. ;)

    Comment by Chuck Roast (104f14) — 4/1/2011 @ 8:59 am

  15. Shades of the “Blonde Joke”.

    Comment by Steven Den Beste (99cfa1) — 4/1/2011 @ 9:09 am

  16. It took me two links to figure it out too, but then when I had hair I was a blonde.

    Comment by BarSinister (a9e7f6) — 4/1/2011 @ 9:43 am

  17. Very very nice. I made it to about 4 links.

    Comment by carlitos (00428f) — 4/1/2011 @ 10:34 am

  18. Damnit! I’m not going to tell you how many links it took!

    Comment by prmetime (4e9c75) — 4/1/2011 @ 1:57 pm

  19. Heh.
    I feel like Ralph, from the Simpsons “I’m happy and angry!

    Comment by AkRonin (a55d13) — 4/1/2011 @ 3:05 pm

  20. I wonder how long it took to set that up? I’ve never even heard of half those people.

    Very well done.

    Comment by DeadGuy (becaa9) — 4/1/2011 @ 4:15 pm

  21. Bravo… With everyone on the lookout for pranks, one would only let one’s guard down on a prank about a prank!

    Hooray for metahumor! Does this qualify as metahumor?

    Comment by breitbartfan77 (5f34ac) — 4/1/2011 @ 5:23 pm

  22. Bravo… With everyone on the lookout for pranks, one would only let one’s guard down on a prank about a prank!

    Hooray for metahumor! Does this qualify as metahumor?

    Comment by breitbartfan77 (5f34ac) — 4/1/2011 @ 5:23 pm

  23. (golf clap)

    Comment by Noah Bawdy (51809d) — 4/1/2011 @ 6:25 pm

  24. Dang it! I didn’t get to fall for the joke! I started reading the comments on the first link which gave it away. I would have enjoyed such a sublime prank.

    Comment by Felipe (d37996) — 4/1/2011 @ 7:22 pm

  25. No frickin way ………..this is my surprised face :/

    Comment by DohBiden (984d23) — 4/1/2011 @ 7:54 pm

  26. I’m blonde and it only took me 1 link to figure it out. So there.

    Comment by DRJ (fdd243) — 4/2/2011 @ 11:30 am

  27. I didn’t do the link/post/thread [oh ... that's new/s (but Aaron did get me on his April tomfoolery)]. None the less, had a guilty pang … yesterday afternoon. For simply not saying hello to SDB, in thread. Feeling like I had somehow been rude. So … Hello SDB.

    :-)

    Comment by Elmo (c0a8c4) — 4/2/2011 @ 11:35 am

  28. I wonder how long it took to set that up?

    Oh, about 10-15 minutes of so. Maybe a tad longer. Just a tad. Or two. But don’t ask us to time a tad.

    Comment by Turk (ef3fe5) — 4/2/2011 @ 6:48 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Powered by WordPress.

Page loaded in: 0.2236 secs.