Re Cops, Unions, and Politics
[Guest post by Jack Dunphy]
Yesterday in this post our host took notice of my most recent column at Pajamas Media, in which I expressed dismay that my labor union, the Los Angeles Police Protective League, had encouraged its members to join in pro-labor protests organized by MoveOn.org, the SEIU, the Daily Kos, and a host of other far-left organizations. He wanted to know how police unions flex their political muscles, specifically asking about work stoppages or slowdowns.
I’m working on a follow-up piece for Pajamas Media in which I’ll amplify further, but I should say here that I do not believe police officers should strike under any circumstances. Absent that tactic, police unions are still vested with clout to the extent that their candidate endorsements can sway voters. Here in Los Angeles, for example, there are still some conservative-leaning districts where voters pay attention to endorsements from the Protective League. Crime is still a hot local issue, and the League can buoy some candidates and torpedo others based on a decision to offer an endorsement or to withhold one.
The League also donates money to some candidates, and even conducts independent expenditure campaigns, as they currently are in the race for the seat in the L.A. city council’s 8th District. The incumbent is Bernard Parks, former chief of the LAPD and a longtime nemesis to the League and to most LAPD officers who recall his tenure with the department. The League has endorsed Forescee Hogan-Rowles in the race and is running radio ads touting her candidacy and slamming Parks.
If Parks survives the challenge he’ll be even more obnoxious in his dealings with LAPD than before, if such a thing is possible.
Again, I’ll have more to say on the issue of cops and unions in an upcoming piece for Pajamas Media. Look for it next week.
Jack:
I see that the newest Chief in L.A. has interjected himself into the new National argument over “high capacity magazines” for semi-automatic firearms.
Of course, magazines of greater than a 10-round capacity have been banned from sale to the public in CA since 2000, and we can see what a huge impact that has had on the crime rate in the state – Not!
But, I’m wondering:
Will this call by the Chief of the largest police department within CA end up with other members of the firearms manufacturing industry cutting off CA law-enforcement from the sale and repair of their products as happened when a previous Chief became involved in the ban of .50BMG weapons by the CA Legislature?
I thought it was a fitting payback when Ronnie Barrett of Barrett Firearms made the LAPD send two officers to TN to retreive two M-82 sniper rifles that they had sent back for repair which he refused to work on, and cut off all CA LE from the sale and service of his firearms – and there were a few others who followed his lead then.
We can only hope that more do so in the future.
Signed: A CA FFL, who’s tired of the special treatment that the Legislature has carved out for LE in the Assault Weapons law, the Safe-Guns List, and the Hi-Cap Magazine ban, just to secure a few votes and a lot of campaign cash.
AD-RtR/OS! (75fc52) — 3/2/2011 @ 11:47 pmIt does not surprise me that you would say that, but it is still good to hear. I feel the same way about Deputy DAs.
Patterico (c218bd) — 3/3/2011 @ 1:07 amI still wonder how you can collectively bargain with much effectiveness if you can’t strike.
The problem is, there inevitably ARE strikes — like the “blue flu” that strikes LASD deputies and plays havoc with the jails and getting defendants to court.
Patterico (c218bd) — 3/3/2011 @ 7:05 amFDR himself was against public sector unions
LarryD (feb78b) — 3/3/2011 @ 7:13 amhttp://www.mediaite.com/tv/no-fox-news-did-not-lie-with-wisconsin-palm-tree-violent-protest-video/
narciso (bf58f6) — 3/3/2011 @ 7:26 am