Sarah Palin Releases Video Response to Blood Libel (Update: Clyburn Responds and Krauthammer for the Defense; Chait “Lord Help Me, I’m Defending Palin.”)
Sarah Palin Releases Video Response to Blood Libel
[Guest post by Aaron Worthing; if you have tips, please send them here.]
Important Update: See this post exonerating two of the tweeters.
Update: Clyburn responds. Predictably. Hit the “more” link and scroll down.
Update (II): I present to you Barrister Charles Krauthammer for the defense. Read the whole thing.
Update (III): Jonathan Chait writes a headline that says it all: Lord Help Me, I’m Defending Palin. The smear fail continues.
This morning we learn that Sarah Palin has responded to the Arizona shooting. This is the video:
I think it’s good, but I worry that she is depending on people knowing what is going on more than they do. I mean, bluntly, most of you reading this are probably political nerds. I am one, too. But how about the rest of the country? I remember reading a few years ago when Daily Kos actually got reflective (don’t laugh) when he noted a poll that said a shockingly low number of Americans even knew who Ann Coulter was. Something like 20%. Now of the people reading this right now, I am willing to bet the number is more like 99%.
Still, I think Palin hit all of the notes she needed to.
Anyway, via Legal Insurrection, here is the full text:
Like millions of Americans I learned of the tragic events in Arizona on Saturday, and my heart broke for the innocent victims. No words can fill the hole left by the death of an innocent, but we do mourn for the victims’ families as we express our sympathy.
I agree with the sentiments shared yesterday at the beautiful Catholic mass held in honor of the victims. The mass will hopefully help begin a healing process for the families touched by this tragedy and for our country.
Our exceptional nation, so vibrant with ideas and the passionate exchange and debate of ideas, is a light to the rest of the world. Congresswoman Giffords and her constituents were exercising their right to exchange ideas that day, to celebrate our Republic’s core values and peacefully assemble to petition our government. It’s inexcusable and incomprehensible why a single evil man took the lives of peaceful citizens that day.
There is a bittersweet irony that the strength of the American spirit shines brightest in times of tragedy. We saw that in Arizona. We saw the tenacity of those clinging to life, the compassion of those who kept the victims alive, and the heroism of those who overpowered a deranged gunman.
Like many, I’ve spent the past few days reflecting on what happened and praying for guidance. After this shocking tragedy, I listened at first puzzled, then with concern, and now with sadness, to the irresponsible statements from people attempting to apportion blame for this terrible event.
President Reagan said, “We must reject the idea that every time a law’s broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions.” Acts of monstrous criminality stand on their own. They begin and end with the criminals who commit them, not collectively with all the citizens of a state, not with those who listen to talk radio, not with maps of swing districts used by both sides of the aisle, not with law-abiding citizens who respectfully exercise their First Amendment rights at campaign rallies, not with those who proudly voted in the last election.
The last election was all about taking responsibility for our country’s future. President Obama and I may not agree on everything, but I know he would join me in affirming the health of our democratic process. Two years ago his party was victorious. Last November, the other party won. In both elections the will of the American people was heard, and the peaceful transition of power proved yet again the enduring strength of our Republic.
Vigorous and spirited public debates during elections are among our most cherished traditions. And after the election, we shake hands and get back to work, and often both sides find common ground back in D.C. and elsewhere. If you don’t like a person’s vision for the country, you’re free to debate that vision. If you don’t like their ideas, you’re free to propose better ideas. But, especially within hours of a tragedy unfolding, journalists and pundits should not manufacture a blood libel that serves only to incite the very hatred and violence they purport to condemn. That is reprehensible.
There are those who claim political rhetoric is to blame for the despicable act of this deranged, apparently apolitical criminal. And they claim political debate has somehow gotten more heated just recently. But when was it less heated? Back in those “calm days” when political figures literally settled their differences with dueling pistols? In an ideal world all discourse would be civil and all disagreements cordial. But our Founding Fathers knew they weren’t designing a system for perfect men and women. If men and women were angels, there would be no need for government. Our Founders’ genius was to design a system that helped settle the inevitable conflicts caused by our imperfect passions in civil ways. So, we must condemn violence if our Republic is to endure.
As I said while campaigning for others last March in Arizona during a very heated primary race, “We know violence isn’t the answer. When we ‘take up our arms’, we’re talking about our vote.” Yes, our debates are full of passion, but we settle our political differences respectfully at the ballot box – as we did just two months ago, and as our Republic enables us to do again in the next election, and the next. That’s who we are as Americans and how we were meant to be. Public discourse and debate isn’t a sign of crisis, but of our enduring strength. It is part of why America is exceptional.
No one should be deterred from speaking up and speaking out in peaceful dissent, and we certainly must not be deterred by those who embrace evil and call it good. And we will not be stopped from celebrating the greatness of our country and our foundational freedoms by those who mock its greatness by being intolerant of differing opinion and seeking to muzzle dissent with shrill cries of imagined insults.
Just days before she was shot, Congresswoman Giffords read the First Amendment on the floor of the House. It was a beautiful moment and more than simply “symbolic,” as some claim, to have the Constitution read by our Congress. I am confident she knew that reading our sacred charter of liberty was more than just “symbolic.” But less than a week after Congresswoman Giffords reaffirmed our protected freedoms, another member of Congress announced that he would propose a law that would criminalize speech he found offensive.
It is in the hour when our values are challenged that we must remain resolved to protect those values. Recall how the events of 9-11 challenged our values and we had to fight the tendency to trade our freedoms for perceived security. And so it is today.
Let us honor those precious lives cut short in Tucson by praying for them and their families and by cherishing their memories. Let us pray for the full recovery of the wounded. And let us pray for our country. In times like this we need God’s guidance and the peace He provides. We need strength to not let the random acts of a criminal turn us against ourselves, or weaken our solid foundation, or provide a pretext to stifle debate.
America must be stronger than the evil we saw displayed last week. We are better than the mindless finger-pointing we endured in the wake of the tragedy. We will come out of this stronger and more united in our desire to peacefully engage in the great debates of our time, to respectfully embrace our differences in a positive manner, and to unite in the knowledge that, though our ideas may be different, we must all strive for a better future for our country. May God bless America.
– Sarah Palin
I was tempted to end this post by snarkily (is that a word?) asking, “so, she is running for president, right?” But let me expand. I mean what she is doing here, seems to be deliberately stepping into that “bully pulpit” role that you normally see a President assume. These days we have come to think that part of the President’s job is to comment on every major issue of the day, and that part of the President’s job is to be the moral beacon for the rest of the nation. I don’t personally buy into that. Yes, I listen when the President talks, generally, but I judge his (or potentially her) wisdom on the merits, without any added weight because s/he is President. But I suspect a lot of Americans do actually look to the President for moral guidance, and here she is stepping into that role.
So we get this video from what could have been a President’s private retreat and Palin doing her best to seem presidential, to respond to the libel against her without getting dragged down too far into the mud. Obama’s staff clearly thinks that they have a chance to turn triumph into tragedy, as one sociopathic analysis imagined. I wouldn’t be surprised if Palin was trying to steal a little of that thunder.
You might call that politicizing the event, and grumble about that. But the fact is that Christina Green’s body wasn’t even cold before many on the left began this blood libel, and so on some level Palin had to respond. So this would be example #371 of liberals strengthening Palin with their attacks.
Update: Congresschmuck Clyburn calls Palin stupid for this video and generally doesn’t get it because she is white. Yes, really:
“You know, Sarah Palin just can’t seem to get it, on any front. I think she’s an attractive person, she is articulate,” Clyburn said on the Bill Press radio show. “But I think intellectually, she seems not to be able to understand what’s going on here.”…
“I have some experiences that maybe she does not have,” he said. “When I see and hear things today that are reminiscent of that period of time, I am very, very concerned about it, because I know what it led to back then, and I know what it can lead to again.”
Yeah, of course Sarah Palin has no experience at all with death threats:
(Further update: Patterico previously covered tweeted threats, here.)
And if someone murdered Sarah Palin tomorrow, would anyone be shocked? No. But something tells me that the left won’t engage in the kind of reflection they are demanding of the right for this Safeway massacre, despite the inconvenient fact that the right had nothing to do with it.
By the way, last night a man claiming to be the author of that video of tweeted death threats said that he has been informed that he has 48 hours to take down that video, in a little bit of leftward fascism. Here’s a hint, liberals. This nothing in that video that isn’t protected by the first amendment. You wrote those words. And in many cases you attached your picture, possibly even your name, to those words. This was not done in private, but all over the internet for anyone to see. You have no legal right to stop someone else from taking a screencap and naming and shaming you for it.
And your fascism won’t work. Thanks to regulars here, I have screencaps of everything on that video and even a copy of the video. You might strike it down, but it will appear elsewhere. It’s called the Streisand effect. Google it.
As for Clyburn, lean in Mr. Congressman, because I have a message for you. You are a disgrace. Congress would be better off without you.
More: Clyburn alleges here that reading the constitution on the House floor contributed to this massacre. Now, as you might remember, Patterico earlier posted video of Giffords herself participating in the reading of the Constitution.
So, OMG, that means that this wasn’t attempted murder on Giffords. This was attempted suicide by Constitution reading!
Of course in this case, reducing Clyburn to absurdity is almost intellectually lazy it is so easy.
[Posted and authored by Aaron Worthing.]
Return to the main page.