Patterico's Pontifications

9/16/2009

The Company He Keeps

Filed under: International,Obama — DRJ @ 10:35 pm



[Guest post by DRJ]

GatewayPundit says it better than I could:

“Next week the Obama Administration will allow Ahmadinejad, Castro, Chavez, Gaddafi and several other international thugs into New York City to speak in front of the United Nations General Assembly. However, one country’s president will not be allowed into the United States.

President Roberto Micheletti from Honduras will not be allowed to enter into America. The US has suspended the visa policy in Honduras.

For the first time in this country’s history, our leaders in government are siding with Marxists Hugo Chavez, Daniel Ortega, Raul Castro and Evo Morales against a democratic foreign leader.”

Before the Presidential election, we were told it’s wrong to judge candidate Obama by his radical friends and associates. Now President Obama chooses to recognize radical international leaders and reject democratic friends. Can we judge him now?

— DRJ

78 Responses to “The Company He Keeps”

  1. there is no need to judge….

    Res Ipsa Loquitur.

    he is a scumbag, and by his own actions you shall know him….. “good man” my tired old GI ass.

    redc1c4 (fb8750)

  2. The way they have treated Honduras is disgusting.

    JD (648c77)

  3. “the Obama Administration”

    [spits]

    Dave Surls (6c17f7)

  4. Where are you getting that Micheletti is one of our “democratic friends”?

    He doesn’t have the approval of Honduran voters. Like it or not, Chavez and the others, excepting Castro, have won elections.

    Presumably, you’d prefer to accept military-authoritarian coupists like Micheletti and reject democratically elected politicians like Morales. In other words, democracy’s got nothing to do with it for you: it’s all about ideological identity…

    Jackson (b9f613)

  5. Don’t you DARE critcize a black man! Hater!

    Doesn’t this reveal, at least a little, tiny bit, Obama’s underlying attitude towards obedience to Constitutional precepts?

    Honduras behaved responsibly, in accordance with its Constitution and federal law in deposing a dictator who refused to leave office. And yet Obama is nothing but censorious. Interesting.

    Obama just recently remarked that he plans on being President “for a while.” I wonder how long a “while” is?

    Steve B (5eacf6)

  6. Jackson is an idiot. Objectively so.

    JD (648c77)

  7. Jackson – It’s all about legal leadership. Micheletti is the legal President of Honduras according to its constitution. The Obama Administration and its socialist and commie friends in South America do not want to recognize the sovreignty of Honduras.

    These are the facts. They are not in dispute.

    daleyrocks (718861)

  8. daley – Not only according to their Constitution, but the Supreme Court as well. But arseholes like Jackson do not care.

    JD (648c77)

  9. Maybe if Micheletti promised to bring Obama some primo Honduran herb he’d let him in. They could call it dried arugula for cover or something.

    daleyrocks (718861)

  10. JD, Obama DID lie. He claims 47 Million “Americans” are without health insurance, knowing full well that a good 17 million are illegal aliens – by definition NOT Americans. Now all of a sudden it’s on 30 million.

    Did he suddenly get “more accurate” numbers, or just get caught in a lie and have to cover?

    Steve B (5eacf6)

  11. Don’t worry, friends. Some of our favorite trolls will be by shortly to explain how this is all skittle pooting good times from the rainbow leaping unicorn of Hope and Change!

    Eric Blair (721b15)

  12. Sorry – wrong thread. My bad.

    Steve B (5eacf6)

  13. No problem, Steve. I suspect I agree with you, if your point is that Barcky lied.

    JD (3ab713)

  14. I like the Steve people that use a capital-S. They tend to not be aggressively mendacious.

    JD (648c77)

  15. “Jackson – It’s all about legal leadership.”

    Not for me. Chavez, Ortega, Castro and Morales are our enemies.

    I wouldn’t let them set foot in America.

    Couldn’t care less whether they were elected or not.

    And, we ought to kick the U.N. General Assembly out of America anyway. Costs a lot of money, and is totally useless.

    Dave Surls (6c17f7)

  16. Can we judge him now?

    Sure, if you’re some kind of racist or something…

    Scott Jacobs (d027b8)

  17. What a bunch of horse shit! Leaders of countries opposed to the United States have been coming to the UN for decades. Khrushchev, Arafat, etc. Very few times has the US government not allowed foreign leaders into New York to speak there.

    Nonsense and more nonsense from the right.

    For chrissake, criticize him for something legitimate!

    JEA (3fc310)

  18. Very few times has the US government not allowed foreign leaders into New York to speak there.
    Comment by JEA — 9/17/2009 @ 4:47 am

    Thanks for making the point.

    Stashiu3 (8cadeb)

  19. Right, JEA. Criticizing him for buddying up to dirty little socialist dictators is completely illegitimate. How silly of us. Criticizing him for pissing on the people of Honduras is just silly too. Thank you for pointing out how blindly partisan we are. Nonsense and more nonsense from JEA.

    JD (9019c8)

  20. How convenient it is conservatives forget that Bush’s best buds Mr. Ahmadinajad and Mr. Chavez both spoke at the UN during his presidency.

    So, yes, the criticism is STUPID.

    JEA (3fc310)

  21. You might want to rethink that, Daleyrocks. It’s not exactly a bedrock conservative position to make a big deal about other countries’ sovereignty. In fact, isn’t the conservative position in America that other countries’s sovereignty is only a matter of convenience for the U.S.?

    I get a feeling you haven’t thought it through.

    Unapologetic Mexican (08580c)

  22. JEA wants reasonable and measured discourse, remember? He wants an end to the hyper-partisanship. And it is a liar. Remember that whole Axis of Evil thingie that sent you and yours all atwitter? Now, Dinnerjacket and Bush are best friends. It is never any less than shocking to see the Left rewriting history on the fly. Chavez and Bush were best buds too.

    Now, you apparently missed the overall point, which you are prone to do. None of the above drivel from your points to an understanding, so I will be nice and help you out. Dinnerjacket, Chavez, etc … despite being evil little fucks are being let in, whereas Barcky is just wee-weeing all over the poor people of Honduras and not allowing their legal President into the country because he is pissed at their Constitutioin and Supreme Court for not allowing Zelaya to become another dirty little socialist dictator. Damn them all to hell.

    JD (9019c8)

  23. Comment by JEA — 9/17/2009 @ 5:17 am

    You’re missing the point, idiot…

    While allowing in dictators, they are keeping out someone who is the leader of a country that actually upheld its constitution.

    Scott Jacobs (d027b8)

  24. “You might want to rethink that, Daleyrocks. It’s not exactly a bedrock conservative position to make a big deal about other countries’ sovereignty.”

    UM – I’m down with it. It’s why Obama didn’t want to say more about the election fraud in Iran but why he’s strangely holding Honduras hostage fir following the rule of thewir own law. Curious that.

    daleyrocks (718861)

  25. “So, yes, the criticism is STUPID.”

    And racist, too, right JEA?

    daleyrocks (718861)

  26. Presumably, you’d prefer to accept military-authoritarian coupists like Micheletti and reject democratically elected politicians like Morales. In other words, democracy’s got nothing to do with it for you: it’s all about ideological identity…

    Comment by Jackson

    No, the ideological identity is you and Chavez and Castro and the other Marxists. I have no problem allowing the dictators into NYC for a UN appearance but barring the president of Honduras is an example of Obama’s Marxist solidarity. The only good news is that Chavez is slowly destroying the oil production of Venezuela, sort of like the way that Obama is destroying the economy of the US, but he has a multi-year head start. The oil industry technicians have left several years ago and the refineries and oil wells are going to shut down from incompetent management.

    These leftist dictatorships are incompetent and destroy themselves. Honduras has shown us what courage looks like.

    Mike K (2cf494)

  27. I get a feeling you haven’t thought it through.

    Was it one of those tingly feelings?

    JD (9019c8)

  28. How convenient it is conservatives forget that Bush’s best buds Mr. Ahmadinajad and Mr. Chavez both spoke at the UN during his presidency.
    Comment by JEA — 9/17/2009 @ 5:17 am

    You mean like when Chavez called President Bush the devil, a donkey, and a drunkard? Or when Ahmadinajad was calling the United States “The Great Satan”? Best buds… right. You’re not very good at this, are you?

    In fact, isn’t the conservative position in America that other countries’s sovereignty is only a matter of convenience for the U.S.?
    Comment by Unapologetic Mexican — 9/17/2009 @ 5:28 am

    Only the position of the conservatives in your head. We need better trolls.

    Stashiu3 (8cadeb)

  29. Wait for it … wait for it … here it comes …

    JD (9019c8)

  30. In fact, isn’t the conservative position in America that other countries’s sovereignty is only a matter of convenience for the U.S.?
    Comment by Unapologetic Mexican — 9/17/2009 @ 5:28 am

    This from someone someone calling themselves “unapologetic mexican”. Mexico does everything it can to undermine the laws of the U.S. in regards to immigration – all the while having draconian immigration laws itself – and NEEDS its own citizens to come here illegally in teh millions and send $$ back to Mexico to keep that country from going bankrupt b/c Mexico is run so incompetently and corruptly.

    Monkeytoe (e66874)

  31. “Can we judge him now”

    Yes! Guilty on all counts!

    Ich denunziere mich als Hasser [I denounce myself as a hater.]

    GM Roper (85dcd7)

  32. You know, going into the Apocalypse, I was absolutely certain that the AntiChrist would be diabolically devious, intelligent and educated.

    Satan is laughing riotously.

    The Mayans were bang on.

    gary gulrud (06aaa3)

  33. Boy, sarcasm is totally lost on you idiots, isn’t it?

    JEA (3fc310)

  34. …he said as he played with himself in front of his mirror.

    Dmac (a93b13)

  35. Boy, sarcasm is totally lost on you idiots, isn’t it?
    Comment by JEA — 9/17/2009 @ 6:46 am

    Sure it was sarcasm JEA. Great recovery. I’m sure there are, let’s see… zero people who believe that. Of course, some of your fellow travelers may pretend they do, but they really don’t.

    By the way, if you really did intend that to be sarcasm (which I don’t believe for a second), what does it say about you that everybody found it perfectly in character for you to make a comment like that? Nothing good, I assure you.

    Stashiu3 (8cadeb)

  36. How’s your supply of Jergen’s this morning, Jerky Boy?

    Dmac (a93b13)

  37. Well Dmac, at least my comment posted right after yours and not right before it. 😉

    Stashiu3 (8cadeb)

  38. Spoke too soon. 🙁

    😉

    Stashiu3 (8cadeb)

  39. Every day I am more convinced Obama is a Manchurian Candidate out to destroy America.

    nk (df76d4)

  40. “other countries’s sovereignty is only a matter of convenience for the U.S.?”

    Clearly so.

    Why else would Obama drop the missle shield for Poland on the anniversary of the Soviet Union’s invasion and annexation of 1/3 of Poland.
    Obviously Poland’s sovereignty is inconvenient at this point in time for President Obama.

    The Poles are some of the few in the coalition who actively fight insurgents and President Obama is tone deaf for dropping this.

    Whats next? An alliance between the US, Bolivia, Nicaraugua, Cuba and Venezuela to combat the rise in democracy in the Southern Hemisphere?
    Maybe start by taking down the Columbians…

    SteveG (97b6b9)

  41. Now he has thrown our Eastern European allies under the bus too.

    bio mom (a1e126)

  42. Every day I am more convinced Obama is a Manchurian Candidate out to destroy America.

    Does that mean Michelle plays the Angela Landsbury character in this scenario?

    Woah, check out the latest – bad news for a guy who’s going to blanket the Sunday morning airwaves:

    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/september_2009/health_care_reform

    How low can you go? “Down goes Frazier! Down goes Frazier!”

    Dmac (a93b13)

  43. (pictures of him in whiteface)

    happyfeet (6b707a)

  44. Jackson is an idiot. Objectively so.
    Comment by JD

    Well, one “lefty” is no better than, and generally about as stupid and foolish as, any other, including the one in the White House.

    “Ass-backwards” is the very definition of a high percentage of liberals, who are almost retarded in the way they perceive and judge people and situations. So in their eyes, Honduras (and its current president) is to Cuba and Venezuela what — oftentimes in a similarly screwed-up way of thinking — a felon is to his victims. ( “Oh, we must rehabilitate the sad, poor, pitiful criminal! And those who were robbed, burglarized or beaten up by him? They must be patient and forgiving about the way the system works. As for someone killed by a convicted murderer? Well, I don’t care! I still say the gas chamber or lethal injection is cruel and unusual punishment!!”)

    The left has a knack for bleeding its heart for the wrong people at the wrong time. The hilarious and disgusting thing is they believe they come from a place of compassion and wonderful humaneness.

    Mark (411533)

  45. I picture Obama in a Jay Cutler uniform at his next teleprompter exercise.

    PCD (02f8c1)

  46. Correct me if I’m wrong (which is very likely) but, aren’t representatives of the UN supposed to be allowed into this country to do their representing? If the Administration is allowed to decide who can and can’t come to the UN, perhaps we should move it to Outer Slovakia (if there is such a place). It might be good for their economy so no one would be refused entry.

    I used that example because I don’t know how to spell all the other crazy names I was thinking.

    The people definitely got what they paid for with Teh Won.

    PatAZ (9d1bb3)

  47. nk–

    I don’t know about “Manchurian”, as I think that Obama is quite home grown, albeit with a side trip to Indonesia.

    But what I get is a person who was radicalized at a young age, with a Communist father [PDF], and a mother who was described by friends as a “fellow traveler” (although this has now been airbrushed from the record). She took him to Indonesia during his early years, where he was indoctinated in the Third World socialist view of America. I believe that this view is the one that remains with him today.

    I think that he was further radicalized by the black liberation movement that was endemic in Afican-America communities from the 60s onwards, and is reflected in people like Professor Gates, Reverend Wright and others. This movement has a deep and abiding hatred for America and its institutions, which it holds responsible for slavery, Jim Crow and its legacy of African-American poverty. They see nothing redeemable in America.

    Further, I believe that the President’s opinions have not much changed from those of his youth, as evidenced by his reported unwillingness to listen to conflicting opinions. This is a man that decided 20 years ago to make America “behave” and nothing much has changed in his mind since he was 15. A bitter youth now a powerful man.

    Accordingly, I feel we have a President who feels that America, as he found it, needs not so much to be reformed as “put down.” I fear that he is aiming at a near total reversal of American ideals and foreign policy. I also believe that not only did he greatly benefit from the Wall Street collapse, but that his supporters may have helped it along, through the massive naked short selling of Lehman that began the collapse.

    As far as foreign policy, I see him antagonizing Britain and much of NATO, our new friends in Eastern Europe (see today’s news), and the network of democracies in Latin America that every President since at least Ford has worked to establish.

    Obama is a socialist who loathes the role of America in the world. If he cannot reform America he will diminish it.

    I really hope I am wrong, but every single thing this administration does reinforces my belief. I just wonder how long it will take for the political center to come out of denial and reject this false savior. I hope it is 2010, and I hope that is not too late.

    Kevin Murphy (3c3db0)

  48. In the realm of ‘things I don’t give a rat’s ass about’, Stashiu3’s opinion is right at the top.

    Considering the amount of abuse I take from the people here, I thought I was pretty decent, BTW.

    JEA (3fc310)

  49. Pat, were you thinking of Rancho Cucamonga?

    PCD (02f8c1)

  50. 47, JEA, the feeling is mutual about YOU!!!

    PCD (02f8c1)

  51. He’s banning him?! Disgusting.

    I’d love to hear Gibbsy talk his way out of this one.

    Patricia (c95a48)

  52. “…Considering the amount of abuse I take from the people here…”

    And, of course, your own personal style has not a thing to do with it. Gosh, that kind of sounds like any number of politicians on both sides.

    Eric Blair (5290b4)

  53. JEA, I wouldn’t take this abuse any more if I were you. There are lots friendlier places for folks with your views. Daily Kos, Wash Monthly, Mother Jones. Lots of deep thinking going on there, too. Almost as deep as yours, although I won’t mention what it is deep in.

    Mike K (2cf494)

  54. Considering the amount of abuse I take from the people here, I thought I was pretty decent, BTW

    Spoken like a true narcissist – no wonder you like your Dear Leader so much. Next time you’re gazing at your navel, try to post somewhere else where the denizens will find it more fascinating.

    BTW, your idiotic rant about Bush “being friends” with those nutabg dictators was asshattery at it’s finest. How ’bout some links to go with that sausage, Sparky?

    Dmac (a93b13)

  55. Mike, I think he’d be better served by posting at HuffBlow or, better yet, Man/Bear/Pig. Hamster just loves those loons.

    Dmac (a93b13)

  56. On top of that, Obama is cancelling the European missile defense. This is screwing over our loyal allies in the region like the Czech Republic and Poland to make Putin happy. And he’s doing it without any reciprocation from Russia.

    Its becoming a pattern that Obama screws our friends and rewards our enemies.

    SPQR (26be8b)

  57. “BTW, your idiotic rant about Bush “being friends” with those nutabg dictators was asshattery at it’s finest. How ’bout some links to go with that sausage, Sparky?”

    Again, and I’ll use small words – I was being sarcastic. To make a point.

    The US has been inviting leaders we hate to the UN for decades. But for some reason the right thinks this suddenly means he loves these tyrants.

    I’d really like to know what evidence the right has that Obama is ‘best friends’ with these foreign despots, because so far I haven’t heard – here or on any other conservative source – anything other than rants.

    JEA (3fc310)

  58. I was going to make another wise and oh-so-very accurate comment that would totally devistate Teh Won and his hangers on but JEA made me laugh so hard with his “…I thought I was pretty decent, BTW.” comment I completely forgot what I was going to say. Damn I hate it when that happens! 😀

    GM Roper (85dcd7)

  59. Oh, yeah, now I remember(well, at least part of it and prompted by his comment #56)! JEA, in case you don’t understand it, here it is in simple words. It’s not that other presidents haven’t allowed despots to speak at the UN, it is that Teh Won(TM) is allowing despots to speak, but denying someone who is legally head of government by the laws of that democratic country. Get it now bub? (I’m not holding my breath by the way)

    GM Roper (85dcd7)

  60. Oops, that should read #57. Sorry [object]!

    GM Roper (85dcd7)

  61. JEA at 56 – And once again you totally miss the whole entire point!

    Foriegn dictators have been coming to meet at the UN since the 1940’s.

    But Obama is refusing to allow the legitimate, legal interim leader of a freindly country to attend. In violation of international treaty.

    Have Blue (854a6e)

  62. Yeah, JEA, why is Obama treating Iran better than honduras?

    Consistently. And this isn’t occurring in a vacuum. When Iran murdered its own people and held a sham election, Obama SUPPORTED Iran. Not just kept his mouth shut, but signaled his support.

    When Honduras proved it had prevented a sham election to lead to a dictator for life, Obama sided against freedom and democracy, and for socialist dictators.

    Juan (bd4b30)

  63. Now that Obama has been in office for awhile, I haven’t seen many fawning articles in the European newspapers about him–I wonder what they think about the empathetic president now that he’s cancelling the missile defense program and cozying up with dictators?

    Rochf (ae9c58)

  64. I’d really like to know what evidence the right has that Obama is ‘best friends’ with these foreign despots,

    Well, I don’t know about O! being “best friends” with them – but you are the first leftist I have ever seen admitting that they are despots – so congrats on that.

    As to the point of this article – the U.S. isn’t “inviting” anyone to the U.N. Per treaty, b/c we have the U.N. situated in our country, we allow such foriegn depots to come to America to visit the U.N. Hence, people not otherwise welcome in teh U.S., a la Castro, still can go to NY to visit the U.N.

    The issue here is that O! is the first U.S. president (I think) to NOT ALLOW a foreign leader to attend the U.N., and he does it w/ a U.S. ally and legitimate leader of that country. Juxtaposed w/ the fact that these despots are coming freely but O! thinks it is important to deny Hondorous is what is so outrageous. And, the fact that he is siding w/ those despots against Hondorous.

    Monkeytoe (e66874)

  65. The US has been inviting leaders we hate to the UN for decades

    We don’t “invite” anyone, you asshat. We don’t control whom the UN invites – do you have any idea what goes on regularly in their daily meetings and conferences? Regular tirades and statements of blanket condemnation of any and all US policies ad nauseum – do you actually think we control anything the UN does, other than providing them most of their operational budget in order for them to bash us to their heart’s content? How old are you? Twelve?

    Again, and I’ll use small words –

    Right back at you – you…are…an…idiot.

    Dmac (a93b13)

  66. The issue here is that O! is the first U.S. president (I think) to NOT ALLOW a foreign leader

    I want to believe this story from GatewayPundit is based either on incorrect information or the top echelon in Honduras is confused as to what’s actually going on, with the US State Department and others. Otherwise, I’ll feel too much disgust and contempt towards the current White House, to a degree that even I didn’t think was possible several months ago.

    News of the Honduran president being purposefully prevented from attending an event at the UN hasn’t been picked up by certain major sources, such as the Drudgereport. So if GatewayPundit is accurate, then the ease with which outrageous, even sickening, ploys can be fostered by the current White House — and its related enablers (hello, Acorn!) — without any or enough glare of publicity also will be something to be disgusted by and worried about.

    Mark (411533)

  67. There was not even one ounce of sarcasm in that, JEA. That is consistent with all of your contributions here. Why are you content with Barcky treating DinnerJacket and Chavez better than the people of Honduras?

    JD (9019c8)

  68. Mark,

    I hope the U.S. grants an emergency visa for Honduran President Micheletti to attend the UN meeting but I think it’s unlikely, especially since as recently as September 3 the State Department was posting photos of Hillary Clinton with “Honduran President Jose Manuel Zelaya.” If there’s any visa granted for a Honduran President, I assume it will only be granted to Zelaya.

    DRJ (a51a0e)

  69. In the realm of ‘things I don’t give a rat’s ass about’, Stashiu3’s opinion is right at the top.
    Comment by JEA — 9/17/2009 @ 8:47 am

    At the top? Strange, because you’re barely on my radar.

    Stashiu3 (8cadeb)

  70. “Gaddafi”

    Seized power in a coup in 1969, has ruled as a dictator ever since, and was a long time supporter of all kinds of terrorists to boot.

    He’s allowed to come here and Micheletti isn’t.

    Apparently the principle is: only anti-American despots are allowed in America by the Obama regime.

    Big shock.

    Dave Surls (19c23e)

  71. as recently as September 3 the State Department was posting photos of Hillary Clinton with “Honduran President Jose Manuel Zelaya.” Comment by DRJ

    That is the essence of sickening.

    I’d feel no less queasy about or outraged by a conservative White House playing footsies with a foreign country’s ultra-rightist politician who’d attempted an end run around his (or her) government if it had the particulars of Honduras (ie, a society that is trying to be as down-to-earth, civil and stable as possible).

    Again, what makes “leftys” like the current occupant of the Oval Office or Madame Sniper-Fire-on-the-Tarmac so flaky, harmful and even dangerous is they believe they’re motivated by humane, wonderful, beautiful sentiments and considerations.

    Mark (411533)

  72. The US is going to have to do a lot of apologizing when these clowns leave office. Assuming, of course, that they ever do — they DO like Chavez’ style.

    Kevin Murphy (805c5b)

  73. Mark – Again, what makes “leftys” like the current occupant of the Oval Office or Madame Sniper-Fire-on-the-Tarmac so flaky, harmful and even dangerous is they believe they’re motivated by humane, wonderful, beautiful sentiments and considerations.

    I disagree. They aren’t stupid or idealistic. They want money and power, and can’t believe that people are so dense as to not spot their incoherent BS – which explains their condescending attitude towards the electorate they consider ‘rubes’.

    Their single belief is in their own elitist status, due in part to the people not rising up and incarcerating them. After taking money and liberty from people for a while with transparently BS excuses and finding no real resistance, anyone would lose respect for the populace in general.

    They’re scum, they know it, and it’s up to us to get rid of them or we’ll deserve everything we get.

    Apogee (e2dc9b)

  74. I wish Michelletti would address the UN via TV satellite broadcast right outside their door, with thousands of patriots listening.

    Patricia (c95a48)

  75. The US is going to have to do a lot of apologizing when these clowns leave office. Assuming, of course, that they ever do — they DO like Chavez’ style.

    Comment by Kevin Murphy — 9/17/2009 @ 5:11 pm

    Remembering some of the leftist kooks’ fears that GWB wouldn’t leave office when his time expired, and seeing everything Obama has done, is doing, has said, I have had the same trepidations.

    I only hope they are unfounded.

    John Hitchcock (3fd153)

  76. John, I am shocked so far at how far Obama has gone. What’s scary in particular is that his apparatus projects. Everything they accused Bush of doing they actually do.

    I don’t think Obama’s circle is dumb enough to think they can cancel free elections, though. And who would want to? Obama’s already looking old. The burden of all this responsibility would crush a well honed leader… and Obama is not a leader. I bet he’d love to quit today if he wouldn’t look like an idiot to do so.

    They will try to steal votes, but I don’t think they will get away with much of that crap. This wonderful nation appears to have realized what’s up.

    Juan (bd4b30)


Powered by WordPress.

Page loaded in: 0.1022 secs.