<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Public Option &#8211; Individual Mandate Two-step</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2009/08/17/the-public-option-individual-mandate-two-step/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2009/08/17/the-public-option-individual-mandate-two-step/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:53:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obama to warn Dems: This is America&#8217;s last shot at universal health care</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/08/17/the-public-option-individual-mandate-two-step/comment-page-7/#comment-597798</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obama to warn Dems: This is America&#8217;s last shot at universal health care</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=29409#comment-597798</guid>
		<description>[...] Ponnuru and Karl (again) made the same point months ago. Instead of attacking the bill at all its points of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ponnuru and Karl (again) made the same point months ago. Instead of attacking the bill at all its points of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; ObamaCare: the not-unexpected cave-in on the public option</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/08/17/the-public-option-individual-mandate-two-step/comment-page-7/#comment-597448</link>
		<dc:creator>The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; ObamaCare: the not-unexpected cave-in on the public option</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=29409#comment-597448</guid>
		<description>[...] takeover of the US healthcare. The Obama administration has always been willing to dance the public option &#8211; mandate two-step. The cat is in the bag. The bag will be in the river unless the GOP &#8212; and public opinion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] takeover of the US healthcare. The Obama administration has always been willing to dance the public option &#8211; mandate two-step. The cat is in the bag. The bag will be in the river unless the GOP &#8212; and public opinion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; ObamaCare: The public option and liberal fascism</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/08/17/the-public-option-individual-mandate-two-step/comment-page-7/#comment-572333</link>
		<dc:creator>The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; ObamaCare: The public option and liberal fascism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=29409#comment-572333</guid>
		<description>[...] Her commenters correctly note that it makes a nice bargaining chip and distraction from the mandate-driven government takeover of the US healthcare system. And the cheap shot answer is that the nutroots generally lack a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Her commenters correctly note that it makes a nice bargaining chip and distraction from the mandate-driven government takeover of the US healthcare system. And the cheap shot answer is that the nutroots generally lack a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; ObamaCare Rock: How a bill gets to the Senate floor</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/08/17/the-public-option-individual-mandate-two-step/comment-page-7/#comment-560496</link>
		<dc:creator>The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; ObamaCare Rock: How a bill gets to the Senate floor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 05:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=29409#comment-560496</guid>
		<description>[...] remains the much larger problem with the bill as John Hood reminds us: It is critically important that we all understand what will [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] remains the much larger problem with the bill as John Hood reminds us: It is critically important that we all understand what will [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; ObamaCare getting even more partisan and more unwieldy</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/08/17/the-public-option-individual-mandate-two-step/comment-page-7/#comment-554776</link>
		<dc:creator>The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; ObamaCare getting even more partisan and more unwieldy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=29409#comment-554776</guid>
		<description>[...] would be big news if it was true, as the individual mandate is as important to a government takeover of healthcare as a government-run insurance [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] would be big news if it was true, as the individual mandate is as important to a government takeover of healthcare as a government-run insurance [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; Pres. Obama&#8217;s historic speech to somebody</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/08/17/the-public-option-individual-mandate-two-step/comment-page-7/#comment-551991</link>
		<dc:creator>The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; Pres. Obama&#8217;s historic speech to somebody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=29409#comment-551991</guid>
		<description>[...] the news cycle). The legislative process has been headed toward health insurance reforms and an individual mandate for a while, which is why progressives have been preparing to be disappointed with this speech [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the news cycle). The legislative process has been headed toward health insurance reforms and an individual mandate for a while, which is why progressives have been preparing to be disappointed with this speech [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; ObamaCare: Public option + trigger = exit strategy?</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/08/17/the-public-option-individual-mandate-two-step/comment-page-7/#comment-548754</link>
		<dc:creator>The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; ObamaCare: Public option + trigger = exit strategy?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=29409#comment-548754</guid>
		<description>[...] Pres. Obama reportedly would like not only to pass a takeover of health insurance based on an individual mandate, but also to get back some of the post-partisan image he had as a candidate. Some administration [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pres. Obama reportedly would like not only to pass a takeover of health insurance based on an individual mandate, but also to get back some of the post-partisan image he had as a candidate. Some administration [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico&#8217;s Pontifications &#187; Is ObamaCare’s problem the brand instead of the plan?</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/08/17/the-public-option-individual-mandate-two-step/comment-page-7/#comment-548239</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico&#8217;s Pontifications &#187; Is ObamaCare’s problem the brand instead of the plan?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=29409#comment-548239</guid>
		<description>[...] annually for it. And the polling on other health insurance reforms does not ask people about the individual mandate necessary to support [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] annually for it. And the polling on other health insurance reforms does not ask people about the individual mandate necessary to support [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; Is ObamaCare&#8217;s problem the brand instead of the plan?</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/08/17/the-public-option-individual-mandate-two-step/comment-page-7/#comment-548236</link>
		<dc:creator>The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; Is ObamaCare&#8217;s problem the brand instead of the plan?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=29409#comment-548236</guid>
		<description>[...] annually for it. And the polling on other health insurance reforms does not ask people about the individual mandate necessary to support [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] annually for it. And the polling on other health insurance reforms does not ask people about the individual mandate necessary to support [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pons Asinorum</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/08/17/the-public-option-individual-mandate-two-step/comment-page-7/#comment-540764</link>
		<dc:creator>Pons Asinorum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 06:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=29409#comment-540764</guid>
		<description>EW, what&#039;s really funny is that everyone is pretty much on the same page.

-All agree that destitute people should be helped.
-All agree that health care reform is needed.
-Most agree that significant government intervention is not going solve it (the arguments seemed to center on the degree of acceptable intervention -- from zero to &quot;lots&quot;).
-No one resorted to &quot;momma&quot; jokes.

Total bloodbath :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EW, what&#8217;s really funny is that everyone is pretty much on the same page.</p>
<p>-All agree that destitute people should be helped.<br />
-All agree that health care reform is needed.<br />
-Most agree that significant government intervention is not going solve it (the arguments seemed to center on the degree of acceptable intervention &#8212; from zero to &#8220;lots&#8221;).<br />
-No one resorted to &#8220;momma&#8221; jokes.</p>
<p>Total bloodbath <img src='http://patterico.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
