Yes, the problems have been identified, and as when you keep a skunk in the back seat of your car, you need to expect many, many detailing bills.

The set of flawed assumptions that accompany each and every comment are specifically chosen to buttress an insular and pre-determined set of partisan facts. When challenged, a new set of assumptions are contrived to buttress the next ‘attack’.

This is boring. I’m off to drink and watch the Lakers mop the floor.

It makes more sense, and is fairer than, his endless repetition of attacks on the person of Sarah Palin. And I don’t mean disagreeing with her politics. I mean the constant drumbeat of attacks on her person. The business of accusing her of “using” her children is particularly disgusting.

If he can do that sort of thing, based on his own opinion, why not receive some of that for himself?

Or he might move to a different topic, and quit being a sexist who refuses to apologize for his sexism and his base partisanship that informs and drives that sexism.

DRJ, I apologize to you for beating this particular deceased equine. But as a parent, the attacks on Palin’s family were particularly disgusting to me. Defending it, and calling Letterman’s mewling self-rationalization an “apology” were a bit much for me. And, again, the accusation that Palin was “using” her children says so very much about the accuser.