<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court Lifts Stay in Chrysler Sale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2009/06/09/supreme-court-lifts-stay-in-chrysler-sale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2009/06/09/supreme-court-lifts-stay-in-chrysler-sale/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:52:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AD - RtR/OS!</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/06/09/supreme-court-lifts-stay-in-chrysler-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-506497</link>
		<dc:creator>AD - RtR/OS!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=26035#comment-506497</guid>
		<description>The good and bad of Government Motors....
The Corvette Team took another class win at LeMans today.
It could very well be the last time they ever compete at LeMans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The good and bad of Government Motors&#8230;.<br />
The Corvette Team took another class win at LeMans today.<br />
It could very well be the last time they ever compete at LeMans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James B. Shearer</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/06/09/supreme-court-lifts-stay-in-chrysler-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-505067</link>
		<dc:creator>James B. Shearer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=26035#comment-505067</guid>
		<description>34

&lt;i&gt; ... Do you not understand how fundamentally wrong that is? &lt;/i&gt;

I don&#039;t see how it is any worse than all the other undeserved benefits the government hands out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>34</p>
<p><i> &#8230; Do you not understand how fundamentally wrong that is? </i></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see how it is any worse than all the other undeserved benefits the government hands out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/06/09/supreme-court-lifts-stay-in-chrysler-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-505062</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=26035#comment-505062</guid>
		<description>h2u - So long as Teh One is doing it, it is alright.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>h2u &#8211; So long as Teh One is doing it, it is alright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/06/09/supreme-court-lifts-stay-in-chrysler-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-505058</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=26035#comment-505058</guid>
		<description>This is pure unadulterated Obama-love here.  Good Allah.  James, you admit that some unsecured creditors are getting more than they deserve.  Good on ya&#039; for at least admitting that.  Do you not understand how fundamentally wrong that is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is pure unadulterated Obama-love here.  Good Allah.  James, you admit that some unsecured creditors are getting more than they deserve.  Good on ya&#8217; for at least admitting that.  Do you not understand how fundamentally wrong that is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed from SFV</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/06/09/supreme-court-lifts-stay-in-chrysler-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-505057</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed from SFV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=26035#comment-505057</guid>
		<description>The Jeep brand is easily worth billions by itself, if there were an unencumbered market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Jeep brand is easily worth billions by itself, if there were an unencumbered market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James B. Shearer</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/06/09/supreme-court-lifts-stay-in-chrysler-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-505052</link>
		<dc:creator>James B. Shearer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=26035#comment-505052</guid>
		<description>30

&lt;i&gt; Pure speculation, James. It was at the expense of both ... &lt;/i&gt;

Why do you believe Chrysler&#039;s assets were worth more than $2 billion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>30</p>
<p><i> Pure speculation, James. It was at the expense of both &#8230; </i></p>
<p>Why do you believe Chrysler&#8217;s assets were worth more than $2 billion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BR</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/06/09/supreme-court-lifts-stay-in-chrysler-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-505049</link>
		<dc:creator>BR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=26035#comment-505049</guid>
		<description>Heh- Fiat law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh- Fiat law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h2u</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/06/09/supreme-court-lifts-stay-in-chrysler-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-505048</link>
		<dc:creator>h2u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=26035#comment-505048</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;However this generosity is at the expense of the taxpayer not the secured creditors.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Pure speculation, James.  It was at the expense of both -- it&#039;s only that we can absolutely certain of the taxpayer expense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>However this generosity is at the expense of the taxpayer not the secured creditors.</p></blockquote>
<p>Pure speculation, James.  It was at the expense of both &#8212; it&#8217;s only that we can absolutely certain of the taxpayer expense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James B. Shearer</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/06/09/supreme-court-lifts-stay-in-chrysler-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-505047</link>
		<dc:creator>James B. Shearer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=26035#comment-505047</guid>
		<description>25

&lt;i&gt; Risky, yes. Unreasonable, no &lt;/i&gt;

It is unreasonable in that it gave the unions more generous terms than it had to.  However this generosity is at the expense of the taxpayer not the secured creditors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>25</p>
<p><i> Risky, yes. Unreasonable, no </i></p>
<p>It is unreasonable in that it gave the unions more generous terms than it had to.  However this generosity is at the expense of the taxpayer not the secured creditors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James B. Shearer</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/06/09/supreme-court-lifts-stay-in-chrysler-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-505045</link>
		<dc:creator>James B. Shearer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=26035#comment-505045</guid>
		<description>19

&lt;i&gt; 19.James - Explain to us why unsecured creditors are being compensated at a rate higher than secured creditors. We already know poon cannot do that, but maybe you can. It will be interesting to hear how that happens in your world, since it rarely if ever happens in bakruptcy court. &lt;/i&gt;

I believe only some unsecured creditors are getting more, others are getting nothing.  As for why, it is because the government is giving them a gift, without government support they would likely get nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>19</p>
<p><i> 19.James &#8211; Explain to us why unsecured creditors are being compensated at a rate higher than secured creditors. We already know poon cannot do that, but maybe you can. It will be interesting to hear how that happens in your world, since it rarely if ever happens in bakruptcy court. </i></p>
<p>I believe only some unsecured creditors are getting more, others are getting nothing.  As for why, it is because the government is giving them a gift, without government support they would likely get nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
