Comments on: Abortion Doctor Killed (Updated)

By: Brother Bradley J. Fikes, C.O.R.

Brother Bradley J. Fikes, C.O.R. — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:45:31 +0000

So it was okay for the President to lie about marital infidelity under oath?

Of course it was okay! Clinton meant well, and he was on the right side, so we should overlook his technical offenses. It’s not lying if you’re a Democrat and you’re opposed by Neanderthal right-wing Republican extremists like Newt Gingrich. Because his opponents are so horrible, Clinton automatically is innocent.

On the other hand, Bushitler is an evil warmongering neocon, so the worst should be assumed of him, even if the evidence doesn’t exist. Republicans are racist scum and are automatically guilty, unless they apologize for being Republicans and say nice things about Democrats.

By: Scott Jacobs

Scott Jacobs — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:30:20 +0000

There’s a shortage of wire coat-hangers?

…

What? Too soon?

By: Michael Ejercito

Michael Ejercito — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:27:39 +0000

I have a friend who believes abortion is murder and he’s quite frank: he believes it would be morally correct to kill the abortion doctor. He just doesn’t have the guts to do it.

And what does he say about the women who have had abortions?

By: Michael Ejercito

Michael Ejercito — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:24:15 +0000

But once you have overtly partisan figures involved, well, you end up impeaching the POTUS because he lied about marital infidelity, even though the person who pressed the issue (Gingrich) was on his third marriage and, I think we can all agree, has no room to speak when it comes to matters of infidelity.

So it was okay for the President to lie about marital infidelity under oath? Are you aware that rape victims were asked about their past sexual history in rape prosecutions? And that if they lied, they could be prosecuted for perjury? Why is it that Bill Clinton gets a free pass to lie about his sex life, but women whose most intimate parts were violated were not free to lie about their sex lives?

By: JD

JD — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:23:03 +0000

What we have here is a case in which evidence was manufactured in order to justify a war

SEK – That is a lie and you are a liar.

By: zena

zena — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:14:46 +0000

I personally don’t care what happened to this
doctor. Live by the sword die by the sword.
He got what he deserved and is a disgrace to the
medical profession.

By: Vermont Neighbor

Vermont Neighbor — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:34:49 +0000

Where, exactly, is Obama curtailing the freedom of speech?

Comment by SEK — 5/31/2009 @ 8:26 pm

1) Removing Chrysler dealers who donated to GOP candidates.

2) Sending Truth Squads out in Missouri to stifle criticism.

3) Issuing marching orders to the cult to disrupt an interview on WGN Radio.

4) Targeting commentary of a private citizen and influential broadcaster.

Also, see first 100 days for additional examples.

By: Scott Jacobs

Scott Jacobs — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:13:00 +0000

I’m not even going to dignify this with a response. Put down the fucking talking points and deal with reality for a second, if you can.

Oh fuck no, asshole. You made the “Bush lied, people died” claim, so list the God Damn lies.

Put something behind one of your asinine statements for once. Just because I’m requiring you to back up your snark doesn’t mean it’s talking points.

By: SteveG

SteveG — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:14:04 +0000

I did Google it.
The word “actual” evidently meant something specific to your interpretation of what the Talmud says.
I suspect that if you gave me your take on what the Talmud “actually” says, that I could use Google and find several authoritative opinions that differ from yours. Wouldn’t mean yours is wrong…

By: nk

nk — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:17:03 +0000

Because all that silliness about “Judeo-Christian values” aside, you do know what the actual, Talmudic position on abortion is, don’t you?

The fetus is not viable until it has graduated from medical school? (Ducks)