<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill O&#8217;Reilly Blog Posting: &#8220;No Marriage for Homos&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2009/05/28/bill-oreilly-blog-posting-no-marriage-for-homos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2009/05/28/bill-oreilly-blog-posting-no-marriage-for-homos/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:54:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: b.brown</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/05/28/bill-oreilly-blog-posting-no-marriage-for-homos/comment-page-1/#comment-510027</link>
		<dc:creator>b.brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=25536#comment-510027</guid>
		<description>Dear Billo,you do not tell the thruth about Dr. Tiller.The Dr. provided a &quot;legal&quot; service for women in need,&amp; had no other alterative because of severe medical complications.If Dr. Tiller is a murderer(as you stated for 6 years)..Then,what about the women?? They were not dragged, sceaming into his office..they provided their babies for the doctor to &quot;kill&quot;(as you stated for 6 years)Why aren&#039;t these 60,000 women arrested for murder..they should also,be charged &amp; jailed for allowing the doctor to &quot;kill&quot;(as you stated for 6 years)their BABIES!..Dr. Tiller was not running around kidnapping pregnant women against their will.Comon,Billo, tell the whole story,like it really is! Also,you have never had any access to any of Dr. Tiller&#039;s records because the records of these women are private..according to the &quot;right to privacy act&quot;..there is no way on this earth that you could ever look at any medical record of any person with out their written approval..especially you,an entertainer of sorts.No way!! Also,if you want to stop all abortions,pass a law mandating that all men have a vasectomy,therefore no pregnacies!..and if men do decide to marry... then they can have this procedure reversed..SIMPLE! let&#039;s give some responsibility to the men for a change!How do you think the women got pregnant in the first place..duh! Furthermore, the government/or men should not be controlling a women&#039;s body..it&#039;s hers!You guys yell about smaller government..well then get out of the medical problems of the women &amp; their bodies!! Billo,you need to be careful what you say on your show..what you say can have  very adverse effects &amp; untoward consequences, such as what happened to Dr. tiller.Do you not have a conscience? I do hope that you will not continue with this unconscionable behavior..AMEN!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Billo,you do not tell the thruth about Dr. Tiller.The Dr. provided a &#8220;legal&#8221; service for women in need,&amp; had no other alterative because of severe medical complications.If Dr. Tiller is a murderer(as you stated for 6 years)..Then,what about the women?? They were not dragged, sceaming into his office..they provided their babies for the doctor to &#8220;kill&#8221;(as you stated for 6 years)Why aren&#8217;t these 60,000 women arrested for murder..they should also,be charged &amp; jailed for allowing the doctor to &#8220;kill&#8221;(as you stated for 6 years)their BABIES!..Dr. Tiller was not running around kidnapping pregnant women against their will.Comon,Billo, tell the whole story,like it really is! Also,you have never had any access to any of Dr. Tiller&#8217;s records because the records of these women are private..according to the &#8220;right to privacy act&#8221;..there is no way on this earth that you could ever look at any medical record of any person with out their written approval..especially you,an entertainer of sorts.No way!! Also,if you want to stop all abortions,pass a law mandating that all men have a vasectomy,therefore no pregnacies!..and if men do decide to marry&#8230; then they can have this procedure reversed..SIMPLE! let&#8217;s give some responsibility to the men for a change!How do you think the women got pregnant in the first place..duh! Furthermore, the government/or men should not be controlling a women&#8217;s body..it&#8217;s hers!You guys yell about smaller government..well then get out of the medical problems of the women &amp; their bodies!! Billo,you need to be careful what you say on your show..what you say can have  very adverse effects &amp; untoward consequences, such as what happened to Dr. tiller.Do you not have a conscience? I do hope that you will not continue with this unconscionable behavior..AMEN!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Conservative &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bill O&#8217;Reilly, Gutless Bloviator</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/05/28/bill-oreilly-blog-posting-no-marriage-for-homos/comment-page-1/#comment-501118</link>
		<dc:creator>California Conservative &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bill O&#8217;Reilly, Gutless Bloviator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 06:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=25536#comment-501118</guid>
		<description>[...] where Patterico&#8217;s Pontifications entered the fray: The latest “Bill O’Reilly blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] where Patterico&#8217;s Pontifications entered the fray: The latest “Bill O’Reilly blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let Freedom Ring &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bill O&#8217;Reilly, Gutless Bloviator</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/05/28/bill-oreilly-blog-posting-no-marriage-for-homos/comment-page-1/#comment-501117</link>
		<dc:creator>Let Freedom Ring &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bill O&#8217;Reilly, Gutless Bloviator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 06:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=25536#comment-501117</guid>
		<description>[...] where Patterico&#8217;s Pontifications entered the fray: The latest “Bill O’Reilly blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] where Patterico&#8217;s Pontifications entered the fray: The latest “Bill O’Reilly blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Defend America</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/05/28/bill-oreilly-blog-posting-no-marriage-for-homos/comment-page-1/#comment-500971</link>
		<dc:creator>Defend America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 23:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=25536#comment-500971</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bill O&#039;Reilly the Hypocrite...&lt;/strong&gt;

This incident involving Hot Air, a blog run by Michelle Malkin, and Bill O&#039;Reilly has bothered me a lot. A summary of the incident and what has come out of it:

The entire O&#8217;Reilly Factor kerfuffle started when Bill assigned himself
the......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bill O&#8217;Reilly the Hypocrite&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This incident involving Hot Air, a blog run by Michelle Malkin, and Bill O&#8217;Reilly has bothered me a lot. A summary of the incident and what has come out of it:</p>
<p>The entire O&#8217;Reilly Factor kerfuffle started when Bill assigned himself<br />
the&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t pick a fight with the blogs &#124; Hoystory</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/05/28/bill-oreilly-blog-posting-no-marriage-for-homos/comment-page-1/#comment-500909</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t pick a fight with the blogs &#124; Hoystory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 21:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=25536#comment-500909</guid>
		<description>[...] O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s $4.95-a-month premium message board site and started scanning the comments. It didn&#8217;t take long for him to find similar, over-the-line &#8220;blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s $4.95-a-month premium message board site and started scanning the comments. It didn&#8217;t take long for him to find similar, over-the-line &#8220;blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BM</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/05/28/bill-oreilly-blog-posting-no-marriage-for-homos/comment-page-1/#comment-500816</link>
		<dc:creator>BM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 13:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=25536#comment-500816</guid>
		<description>I was thinking about signing up for commenting on his site just to post the most extreme and nasty comments so that others could use them against him in exactly the way he is against others.

But I see that is not neccessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking about signing up for commenting on his site just to post the most extreme and nasty comments so that others could use them against him in exactly the way he is against others.</p>
<p>But I see that is not neccessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CHUCK</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/05/28/bill-oreilly-blog-posting-no-marriage-for-homos/comment-page-1/#comment-500810</link>
		<dc:creator>CHUCK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 11:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=25536#comment-500810</guid>
		<description>GAY MARRIAGE WAS VOTED DOWN TWICE IN CALIFORNIA . GIVE IT UP &amp; MOVE TO VERMONT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GAY MARRIAGE WAS VOTED DOWN TWICE IN CALIFORNIA . GIVE IT UP &amp; MOVE TO VERMONT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/05/28/bill-oreilly-blog-posting-no-marriage-for-homos/comment-page-1/#comment-500769</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 04:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=25536#comment-500769</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;So what is your point exactly?&lt;/i&gt;

That homosexuality has always been treated as though it were rather obscure or (or, actually, that should be &quot;AND&quot;) peculiar. For example, I understand Alexander the Great dabbled with dudes. Do the record books -- do the historians and scholars -- of then and today, happily point out and certainly glorify in that aspect of his background?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So what is your point exactly?</i></p>
<p>That homosexuality has always been treated as though it were rather obscure or (or, actually, that should be &#8220;AND&#8221;) peculiar. For example, I understand Alexander the Great dabbled with dudes. Do the record books &#8212; do the historians and scholars &#8212; of then and today, happily point out and certainly glorify in that aspect of his background?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlitos</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/05/28/bill-oreilly-blog-posting-no-marriage-for-homos/comment-page-1/#comment-500764</link>
		<dc:creator>carlitos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 04:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=25536#comment-500764</guid>
		<description>So what is your point exactly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what is your point exactly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/05/28/bill-oreilly-blog-posting-no-marriage-for-homos/comment-page-1/#comment-500762</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 04:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=25536#comment-500762</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; regarding how gay marriage has “never” been accepted or codified. &lt;/i&gt;

But notice that those records from the distant past didn&#039;t really come out and explicitly say Person A and Person B were part of a legal contract due to their having the hots for one another. 

Homosexuality has always been treated as though it were rather obscure or peculiar, symbolized by no less than an extremely famous personage of history like Leonardo da Vinci, whose life was greatly publicized and celebrated, except for one thing: his apparent preference for relationships with the same sex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> regarding how gay marriage has “never” been accepted or codified. </i></p>
<p>But notice that those records from the distant past didn&#8217;t really come out and explicitly say Person A and Person B were part of a legal contract due to their having the hots for one another. </p>
<p>Homosexuality has always been treated as though it were rather obscure or peculiar, symbolized by no less than an extremely famous personage of history like Leonardo da Vinci, whose life was greatly publicized and celebrated, except for one thing: his apparent preference for relationships with the same sex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
