<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dems search the couch for healthcare takeover money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2009/05/13/dems-search-the-couch-for-healthcare-takeover-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2009/05/13/dems-search-the-couch-for-healthcare-takeover-money/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:34:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patterico&#8217;s Pontifications &#187; Dialing 911 for Obamacare (updated)</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/05/13/dems-search-the-couch-for-healthcare-takeover-money/comment-page-2/#comment-522089</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico&#8217;s Pontifications &#187; Dialing 911 for Obamacare (updated)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=24817#comment-522089</guid>
		<description>[...] hate to say I told you so, but I told you so.  By the way, Cohn also reported that the Senate Finance Committee has postponed its healthcare [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hate to say I told you so, but I told you so.  By the way, Cohn also reported that the Senate Finance Committee has postponed its healthcare [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; Dialing 911 for Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/05/13/dems-search-the-couch-for-healthcare-takeover-money/comment-page-2/#comment-508309</link>
		<dc:creator>The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; Dialing 911 for Obamacare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=24817#comment-508309</guid>
		<description>[...] hate to say I told you so, but I told you so. By the way, Cohn also reported that the Senate Finance Committee has postponed its healthcare [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hate to say I told you so, but I told you so. By the way, Cohn also reported that the Senate Finance Committee has postponed its healthcare [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; Will Olympia Snowe derail Obamacare?</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/05/13/dems-search-the-couch-for-healthcare-takeover-money/comment-page-2/#comment-504536</link>
		<dc:creator>The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; Will Olympia Snowe derail Obamacare?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=24817#comment-504536</guid>
		<description>[...] This has been obvious for a while, but it always bears repeating, especially to readers of The New York Times. The Obama administration has studied the Clintons&#8217; failure to take over American medicine, and is pursuing a different Congressional strategy. But Congress remains Congress. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This has been obvious for a while, but it always bears repeating, especially to readers of The New York Times. The Obama administration has studied the Clintons&#8217; failure to take over American medicine, and is pursuing a different Congressional strategy. But Congress remains Congress. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/05/13/dems-search-the-couch-for-healthcare-takeover-money/comment-page-2/#comment-495640</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 17:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=24817#comment-495640</guid>
		<description>It is just like he did with Caterpillar.  Actually, I think it is intentional. Barcky knows that his words will get much more coverage than someone from a trade association will get days after the fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is just like he did with Caterpillar.  Actually, I think it is intentional. Barcky knows that his words will get much more coverage than someone from a trade association will get days after the fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SPQR</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/05/13/dems-search-the-couch-for-healthcare-takeover-money/comment-page-2/#comment-495639</link>
		<dc:creator>SPQR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 17:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=24817#comment-495639</guid>
		<description>JD, I think he believes that no one would dare contradict him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JD, I think he believes that no one would dare contradict him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/05/13/dems-search-the-couch-for-healthcare-takeover-money/comment-page-2/#comment-495637</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 16:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=24817#comment-495637</guid>
		<description>Barcky misrepresented what someone else said?  Nah, get out of here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barcky misrepresented what someone else said?  Nah, get out of here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SPQR</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/05/13/dems-search-the-couch-for-healthcare-takeover-money/comment-page-2/#comment-495635</link>
		<dc:creator>SPQR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 16:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=24817#comment-495635</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/22559.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;More signs of just how utterly incompetent Obama and his people are&lt;/a&gt;.

Beyond my most cynical beliefs in just how empty this suit is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/22559.html" rel="nofollow">More signs of just how utterly incompetent Obama and his people are</a>.</p>
<p>Beyond my most cynical beliefs in just how empty this suit is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SPQR</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/05/13/dems-search-the-couch-for-healthcare-takeover-money/comment-page-2/#comment-495325</link>
		<dc:creator>SPQR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 21:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=24817#comment-495325</guid>
		<description>Some &lt;a href=&quot;http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=Nzc5MDdjYzc1YjZkNWU0MjE5ZjM5MDUzN2RhZDRiYTI=&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;early indications of the plan being mooted by Democrats&lt;/a&gt;.

Notice that the Coward in residence of the White House is not putting his fingerprints on it directly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=Nzc5MDdjYzc1YjZkNWU0MjE5ZjM5MDUzN2RhZDRiYTI=" rel="nofollow">early indications of the plan being mooted by Democrats</a>.</p>
<p>Notice that the Coward in residence of the White House is not putting his fingerprints on it directly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJBrutus</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/05/13/dems-search-the-couch-for-healthcare-takeover-money/comment-page-2/#comment-495108</link>
		<dc:creator>MJBrutus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 10:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=24817#comment-495108</guid>
		<description>So this is what happens when you promise everything to everyone.  Can&#039;t pass cap and trade because it will hurt the unions in that industry who you made promises to.  Can&#039;t pass health care because somebody will need to pay for it and you already promised everybody that nobody will have to pay for anything.  Well, I suppose we can just keep on borrowing the money from our children.  They&#039;ll understand some day and thank us for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this is what happens when you promise everything to everyone.  Can&#8217;t pass cap and trade because it will hurt the unions in that industry who you made promises to.  Can&#8217;t pass health care because somebody will need to pay for it and you already promised everybody that nobody will have to pay for anything.  Well, I suppose we can just keep on borrowing the money from our children.  They&#8217;ll understand some day and thank us for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/05/13/dems-search-the-couch-for-healthcare-takeover-money/comment-page-2/#comment-495072</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 05:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=24817#comment-495072</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Nominating her is a signal to the voters whose votes you need that the GOP is run by a bunch of non-serious folks.&lt;/i&gt;

Non-serious. Huh? You mean people (or those &quot;voters whose votes you need&quot;) who&#039;ve looked the other way as the big butthead -- aka Joe Biden -- who in reality was Palin&#039;s direct opponent (meaning VP vs VP) -- sits one slot away from the Oval Office?

Now you can say that &quot;those voters whose votes you (ie GOP) need&quot; won&#039;t be happy with any candidate in the Republican camp who isn&#039;t super squishy philosophically, perhaps a variation of Ah-nold Schwarzenegger. But to claim their preferences are based on whether a candidate is &quot;non-serious&quot; or not is far too imprecise and ironic a phrase.

After all, a lot of &quot;those voters whose votes you need&quot; are the same goofuses -- ie, self-described independents who in reality are closeted liberals, and too embarrassed to admit it -- who have pushed California (aka the &quot;Golden State&quot;) further and further to the left over the past 10 years--nothwithstanding a minor pause or hiccup when out of desperation they voted to recall Gray Davis. And we all know what a wonderful -- and very non-serious -- joke the &quot;Golden State&quot; has become.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nominating her is a signal to the voters whose votes you need that the GOP is run by a bunch of non-serious folks.</i></p>
<p>Non-serious. Huh? You mean people (or those &#8220;voters whose votes you need&#8221;) who&#8217;ve looked the other way as the big butthead &#8212; aka Joe Biden &#8212; who in reality was Palin&#8217;s direct opponent (meaning VP vs VP) &#8212; sits one slot away from the Oval Office?</p>
<p>Now you can say that &#8220;those voters whose votes you (ie GOP) need&#8221; won&#8217;t be happy with any candidate in the Republican camp who isn&#8217;t super squishy philosophically, perhaps a variation of Ah-nold Schwarzenegger. But to claim their preferences are based on whether a candidate is &#8220;non-serious&#8221; or not is far too imprecise and ironic a phrase.</p>
<p>After all, a lot of &#8220;those voters whose votes you need&#8221; are the same goofuses &#8212; ie, self-described independents who in reality are closeted liberals, and too embarrassed to admit it &#8212; who have pushed California (aka the &#8220;Golden State&#8221;) further and further to the left over the past 10 years&#8211;nothwithstanding a minor pause or hiccup when out of desperation they voted to recall Gray Davis. And we all know what a wonderful &#8212; and very non-serious &#8212; joke the &#8220;Golden State&#8221; has become.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
