<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mentally Handicapped Man Challenges Obama to Contest: Who Can Do a Better Job Running the Country?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2009/03/21/mentally-handicapped-man-challenges-obama-to-contest-who-can-do-a-better-job-running-the-country-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2009/03/21/mentally-handicapped-man-challenges-obama-to-contest-who-can-do-a-better-job-running-the-country-2/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:42:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patterico</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/03/21/mentally-handicapped-man-challenges-obama-to-contest-who-can-do-a-better-job-running-the-country-2/comment-page-1/#comment-479412</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=23677#comment-479412</guid>
		<description>This is an attempt at de-escalation of a conflict that has arisen with another blogger.  There used to be comments here.  They were very unpleasant.  I have taken those comments offline, by publishing a new post with the same content, and putting the old post in &quot;unpublished&quot; status.

The intent is not to hide evidence, but to de-escalate.  The comments can be restored at any time.  If anyone wants to say that I&#039;m hiding evidence, I can restore the previous comments at a moment&#039;s notice -- and take whatever other action is necessary.

The other party and I will never agree on the nature of what happened.  Each will always consider themselves to be the more wronged party.  I suggest we forget it and move on.

My suggestion for going forward would be that the other blogger and I simply refrain from talking about each other personally in the future.  I suggest that we discuss ideas, and be as forceful as ever in discussing those ideas -- but never mention the other person by name, and never, ever attack the other person&#039;s integrity, sanity, etc.  This means neither of us should suggest, even in an offhand manner in a comments thread, that this episode ended because I Was Really the Guy in the Right, that The Other Guy Just Couldn&#039;t Handle the Argument, that We All Know I Was Winning the Argument, etc.  A comment like: &quot;Well, commenter x, I&#039;d agree with you that I won, but I&#039;m not allowed to say that&quot; or &quot;I think we know why those comments were deleted&quot; or &quot;Let&#039;s just remember that blogger x did this dishonorable thing&quot; or anything like that will inevitably lead to a re-escalation, which will benefit nobody.

Again, the evidence remains.  I can always restore these comments and take whatever other steps I need to take to make my case.  In the meantime, I consider this my effort to de-escalate, and I would hope it would be reciprocated in kind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an attempt at de-escalation of a conflict that has arisen with another blogger.  There used to be comments here.  They were very unpleasant.  I have taken those comments offline, by publishing a new post with the same content, and putting the old post in &#8220;unpublished&#8221; status.</p>
<p>The intent is not to hide evidence, but to de-escalate.  The comments can be restored at any time.  If anyone wants to say that I&#8217;m hiding evidence, I can restore the previous comments at a moment&#8217;s notice &#8212; and take whatever other action is necessary.</p>
<p>The other party and I will never agree on the nature of what happened.  Each will always consider themselves to be the more wronged party.  I suggest we forget it and move on.</p>
<p>My suggestion for going forward would be that the other blogger and I simply refrain from talking about each other personally in the future.  I suggest that we discuss ideas, and be as forceful as ever in discussing those ideas &#8212; but never mention the other person by name, and never, ever attack the other person&#8217;s integrity, sanity, etc.  This means neither of us should suggest, even in an offhand manner in a comments thread, that this episode ended because I Was Really the Guy in the Right, that The Other Guy Just Couldn&#8217;t Handle the Argument, that We All Know I Was Winning the Argument, etc.  A comment like: &#8220;Well, commenter x, I&#8217;d agree with you that I won, but I&#8217;m not allowed to say that&#8221; or &#8220;I think we know why those comments were deleted&#8221; or &#8220;Let&#8217;s just remember that blogger x did this dishonorable thing&#8221; or anything like that will inevitably lead to a re-escalation, which will benefit nobody.</p>
<p>Again, the evidence remains.  I can always restore these comments and take whatever other steps I need to take to make my case.  In the meantime, I consider this my effort to de-escalate, and I would hope it would be reciprocated in kind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
