<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Pair of Chuckling, Sneering Charlies Smirk and Laugh It Up About That $780 Billion Disaster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2009/02/11/a-pair-of-chuckling-sneering-charlies-smirk-and-laugh-it-up-about-that-780-billion-disaster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2009/02/11/a-pair-of-chuckling-sneering-charlies-smirk-and-laugh-it-up-about-that-780-billion-disaster/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:18:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/02/11/a-pair-of-chuckling-sneering-charlies-smirk-and-laugh-it-up-about-that-780-billion-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-458011</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 03:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=22055#comment-458011</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Rich, the same way that animal sacrifice during a solar eclipse ensures that the sun returns from behind the moon.&lt;/blockquote&gt;


LOL! My cat resents that...and warns me not to even think about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Rich, the same way that animal sacrifice during a solar eclipse ensures that the sun returns from behind the moon.</p></blockquote>
<p>LOL! My cat resents that&#8230;and warns me not to even think about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Bordner</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/02/11/a-pair-of-chuckling-sneering-charlies-smirk-and-laugh-it-up-about-that-780-billion-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-457981</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Bordner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=22055#comment-457981</guid>
		<description>SPQR,
LOL...well said...well said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SPQR,<br />
LOL&#8230;well said&#8230;well said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alasdair</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/02/11/a-pair-of-chuckling-sneering-charlies-smirk-and-laugh-it-up-about-that-780-billion-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-457962</link>
		<dc:creator>Alasdair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=22055#comment-457962</guid>
		<description>What I would *really* like to see would be Obama getting together with Congressional GOP and Blue Dog Democrats to craft a genuine stimulus-only Bill - and then see Obama use the Presidential bully-pulpit to end-run around Pelosi/Reid to get it into law ... I would love to see Obama successfully end the Pelosi/Reid Recession ... Sadly, all I see, so far, is Obama proposing to accelerate the Obama/Pelosi/Reid Recession ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I would *really* like to see would be Obama getting together with Congressional GOP and Blue Dog Democrats to craft a genuine stimulus-only Bill &#8211; and then see Obama use the Presidential bully-pulpit to end-run around Pelosi/Reid to get it into law &#8230; I would love to see Obama successfully end the Pelosi/Reid Recession &#8230; Sadly, all I see, so far, is Obama proposing to accelerate the Obama/Pelosi/Reid Recession &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hitchcock</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/02/11/a-pair-of-chuckling-sneering-charlies-smirk-and-laugh-it-up-about-that-780-billion-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-457784</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hitchcock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=22055#comment-457784</guid>
		<description>sam, I am not &quot;Trading Places&quot; with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sam, I am not &#8220;Trading Places&#8221; with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Horatio</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/02/11/a-pair-of-chuckling-sneering-charlies-smirk-and-laugh-it-up-about-that-780-billion-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-457782</link>
		<dc:creator>Horatio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=22055#comment-457782</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What’s Schumer’s email address? We should all send him an email with the subject line “I care about pork spending”.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
He could receive a million such cards, and he wouldn&#039;t give a damn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What’s Schumer’s email address? We should all send him an email with the subject line “I care about pork spending”.</p></blockquote>
<p>He could receive a million such cards, and he wouldn&#8217;t give a damn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/02/11/a-pair-of-chuckling-sneering-charlies-smirk-and-laugh-it-up-about-that-780-billion-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-457736</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=22055#comment-457736</guid>
		<description>Hey, 13 bucks a week...I can go to the movies by myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, 13 bucks a week&#8230;I can go to the movies by myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SPQR</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/02/11/a-pair-of-chuckling-sneering-charlies-smirk-and-laugh-it-up-about-that-780-billion-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-457624</link>
		<dc:creator>SPQR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=22055#comment-457624</guid>
		<description>Rich, the same way that animal sacrifice during a solar eclipse ensures that the sun returns from behind the moon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich, the same way that animal sacrifice during a solar eclipse ensures that the sun returns from behind the moon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Beloit</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/02/11/a-pair-of-chuckling-sneering-charlies-smirk-and-laugh-it-up-about-that-780-billion-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-457484</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Beloit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=22055#comment-457484</guid>
		<description>The pols and public officials get hundreds of billions to spend. Workers get $13 a week. Yes, $13 a week. That may pay the cigarette tax increase for smokers. I don&#039;t know what non-smokers will do with all that dough.
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090212/D96A0AGO0.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pols and public officials get hundreds of billions to spend. Workers get $13 a week. Yes, $13 a week. That may pay the cigarette tax increase for smokers. I don&#8217;t know what non-smokers will do with all that dough.<br />
<a href="http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090212/D96A0AGO0.html" rel="nofollow">http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090212/D96A0AGO0.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriot &#187; Theme Song for Obama&#8217;s Democrats&#8220;Money, Money, Money, Can You Use Any Money Today?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/02/11/a-pair-of-chuckling-sneering-charlies-smirk-and-laugh-it-up-about-that-780-billion-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-457427</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriot &#187; Theme Song for Obama&#8217;s Democrats&#8220;Money, Money, Money, Can You Use Any Money Today?&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=22055#comment-457427</guid>
		<description>[...] 48 hours.&#8220;  Even one House Democratic leader suggested that his Senate counterparts &#8220;don’t know everything that’s in the bill.&#8220;   And one the boondoggle&#8217;s few Republican backers believes it needed more time for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 48 hours.&#8220;  Even one House Democratic leader suggested that his Senate counterparts &#8220;don’t know everything that’s in the bill.&#8220;   And one the boondoggle&#8217;s few Republican backers believes it needed more time for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Bordner</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2009/02/11/a-pair-of-chuckling-sneering-charlies-smirk-and-laugh-it-up-about-that-780-billion-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-457404</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Bordner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 06:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=22055#comment-457404</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure this question has been asked a gazillion times, but what I&#039;m wondering is how, exactly, will jobs be created by these provisions?  All I hear is assumption...they assert it will create jobs, but I haven&#039;t heard an explanation how.  Shouldn&#039;t that be the bottom line of the different provisions in the bill?  For the sake of conversation, assume that all the earmarks would go to good things (I know, I know, just assume that *for the sake of conversation*)...even if we grant that HUGE assumption, this is a *stimulus* bill.  If it doesn&#039;t create jobs, save it for another bill.  

Has anyone heard an argument out there spelling it out?  Or does the emperor have no clothes, and certain folks are trying to hush that up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure this question has been asked a gazillion times, but what I&#8217;m wondering is how, exactly, will jobs be created by these provisions?  All I hear is assumption&#8230;they assert it will create jobs, but I haven&#8217;t heard an explanation how.  Shouldn&#8217;t that be the bottom line of the different provisions in the bill?  For the sake of conversation, assume that all the earmarks would go to good things (I know, I know, just assume that *for the sake of conversation*)&#8230;even if we grant that HUGE assumption, this is a *stimulus* bill.  If it doesn&#8217;t create jobs, save it for another bill.  </p>
<p>Has anyone heard an argument out there spelling it out?  Or does the emperor have no clothes, and certain folks are trying to hush that up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
