Comments on: Obama’s Attorney General http://patterico.com/2009/01/19/obamas-attorney-general/ Harangues that just make sense Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:33:59 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Rielle http://patterico.com/2009/01/19/obamas-attorney-general/comment-page-1/#comment-448506 Rielle Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:15:47 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=21303#comment-448506 The fix is in. The fix is in.

]]> By: SteveG http://patterico.com/2009/01/19/obamas-attorney-general/comment-page-1/#comment-447080 SteveG Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:02:23 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=21303#comment-447080 Thank you sweet lord for Rielle Hunter... Thank you sweet lord for Rielle Hunter…

]]> By: Stan Switek http://patterico.com/2009/01/19/obamas-attorney-general/comment-page-1/#comment-447079 Stan Switek Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:58:34 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=21303#comment-447079 John Freaking Edwards????? John Freaking Edwards?????

]]> By: Mark http://patterico.com/2009/01/19/obamas-attorney-general/comment-page-1/#comment-447067 Mark Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:33:31 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=21303#comment-447067 Eric Holder versus John Edwards? Lousy versus lousier? Scroungy versus scroungier? At the very least, two peas in a pod--and a very liberal pod at that. So one of the two has put the LAPD through the grinder by making its arrest procedures beholden to neurotic politically-correct thinking gone berserk, while the other guy has chased ambulances until they've run out of gas. Eric Holder versus John Edwards? Lousy versus lousier? Scroungy versus scroungier? At the very least, two peas in a pod–and a very liberal pod at that.

So one of the two has put the LAPD through the grinder by making its arrest procedures beholden to neurotic politically-correct thinking gone berserk, while the other guy has chased ambulances until they’ve run out of gas.

]]> By: DRJ http://patterico.com/2009/01/19/obamas-attorney-general/comment-page-1/#comment-447031 DRJ Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:41:53 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=21303#comment-447031 JVW, He seems to be a plan-ahead guy so I wouldn't doubt it, but I think the rumors about John Edwards were designed to appeal to Edwards' supporters during the primary battle in which Obama and Clinton were the front-runners. JVW,

He seems to be a plan-ahead guy so I wouldn’t doubt it, but I think the rumors about John Edwards were designed to appeal to Edwards’ supporters during the primary battle in which Obama and Clinton were the front-runners.

]]> By: AD http://patterico.com/2009/01/19/obamas-attorney-general/comment-page-1/#comment-447018 AD Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:47:38 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=21303#comment-447018 No! I'm not confused. I know very well which ones are AssHoles - All of them! The Lying AssHoles are moving their lips. No! I’m not confused. I know very well which ones are AssHoles – All of them!
The Lying AssHoles are moving their lips.

]]> By: John Hitchcock http://patterico.com/2009/01/19/obamas-attorney-general/comment-page-1/#comment-447013 John Hitchcock Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:34:40 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=21303#comment-447013 You're confused, AD. Liberals are liberal with OPM. So extravagances are not hypocritical for liberals; only for conservatives. Perceived extravagances are much less hypocritical for liberals but yet still hypocritical for conservatives. You’re confused, AD. Liberals are liberal with OPM. So extravagances are not hypocritical for liberals; only for conservatives. Perceived extravagances are much less hypocritical for liberals but yet still hypocritical for conservatives.

]]> By: AD http://patterico.com/2009/01/19/obamas-attorney-general/comment-page-1/#comment-447011 AD Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:31:29 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=21303#comment-447011 <i>"...Sarah Palin’s wardrobe was an issue..."</i> but nary a peep about how much was paid, and by whom, for the Obama Inauguration Wardrobe. Ah, Left-Wing MSM (YES, I repeat myself), thy name is spelled H Y P O C R A S Y ! “…Sarah Palin’s wardrobe was an issue…”

but nary a peep about how much was paid, and by whom, for the Obama Inauguration Wardrobe.

Ah, Left-Wing MSM (YES, I repeat myself), thy name is spelled H Y P O C R A S Y !

]]> By: JVW http://patterico.com/2009/01/19/obamas-attorney-general/comment-page-1/#comment-446995 JVW Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:54:16 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=21303#comment-446995 <i>Last year at this time, sources close to candidate Obama were spreading the word that the Attorney General in an Obama Administration would be John Edwards. . . . A lot can change in a year.</i> But one thing that apparently hasn't changed in the past year is Obama's sense of his grand destiny and worthiness of the throne. Was he really already planning his Cabinet last January? Thank God I have (or, had, I guess) mostly forgotten it. Last year at this time, sources close to candidate Obama were spreading the word that the Attorney General in an Obama Administration would be John Edwards. . . . A lot can change in a year.

But one thing that apparently hasn’t changed in the past year is Obama’s sense of his grand destiny and worthiness of the throne. Was he really already planning his Cabinet last January? Thank God I have (or, had, I guess) mostly forgotten it.

]]> By: tmac http://patterico.com/2009/01/19/obamas-attorney-general/comment-page-1/#comment-446983 tmac Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:26:38 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=21303#comment-446983 Edwards was nothing more than misdirection. Float an extreme choice as a viable candidate to make anyone else acceptable. Edwards was nothing more than misdirection. Float an extreme choice as a viable candidate to make anyone else acceptable.

]]>