Comments on: Minnesota Senate Update http://patterico.com/2008/12/14/minnesota-senate-update/ Harangues that just make sense Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:26:51 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Kevin Murphy http://patterico.com/2008/12/14/minnesota-senate-update/comment-page-3/#comment-435507 Kevin Murphy Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:34:06 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=19594#comment-435507 My but there's an awful lot of folks here with nothing better to do. Give it a rest already. My but there’s an awful lot of folks here with nothing better to do. Give it a rest already.

]]> By: truthnjustice http://patterico.com/2008/12/14/minnesota-senate-update/comment-page-3/#comment-435502 truthnjustice Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:54:17 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=19594#comment-435502 <blockquote>you have mad skillz. Comment by Eric Blair — 12/16/2008 @ 5:17 pm </blockquote> Thanks!

you have mad skillz.

Comment by Eric Blair — 12/16/2008 @ 5:17 pm

Thanks!

]]> By: Another Drew http://patterico.com/2008/12/14/minnesota-senate-update/comment-page-3/#comment-435500 Another Drew Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:49:10 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=19594#comment-435500 <i>Comment by Another Drew — 12/16/2008 @ 5:46 pm</i> Posted here by mistake... Should have been posted on the NYS Budget thread. Comment by Another Drew — 12/16/2008 @ 5:46 pm

Posted here by mistake…
Should have been posted on the NYS Budget thread.

]]> By: Another Drew http://patterico.com/2008/12/14/minnesota-senate-update/comment-page-3/#comment-435499 Another Drew Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:46:26 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=19594#comment-435499 <i>Comment by Eric Blair — 12/16/2008 @ 5:17 pm</i> It is unfortunate that The One forewent public financing for his campaign, or else we could have been the beneficiaries of a comprehensive audit of his expenditures via the FEC. It would be interesting to know how much money the campaign spent on the transportation and housing of the Obama girls for the last two years? Comment by Eric Blair — 12/16/2008 @ 5:17 pm
It is unfortunate that The One forewent public financing for his campaign, or else we could have been the beneficiaries of a comprehensive audit of his expenditures via the FEC.
It would be interesting to know how much money the campaign spent on the transportation and housing of the Obama girls for the last two years?

]]> By: Eric Blair http://patterico.com/2008/12/14/minnesota-senate-update/comment-page-3/#comment-435494 Eric Blair Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:17:43 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=19594#comment-435494 Are you <b>seriously</b> trying out the "<i>well, you are another</i>" type of response? This is yet another reason why we (and I do mean "we", as opposed to your own...um...conception of reality) think you are not a high school teacher, and have only a very sketchy science background. However, as a troll, you have <i>mad skillz.</i> Are you seriously trying out the “well, you are another” type of response? This is yet another reason why we (and I do mean “we”, as opposed to your own…um…conception of reality) think you are not a high school teacher, and have only a very sketchy science background.

However, as a troll, you have mad skillz.

]]> By: truthnjustice http://patterico.com/2008/12/14/minnesota-senate-update/comment-page-3/#comment-435492 truthnjustice Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:05:20 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=19594#comment-435492 EB-Projection. EB-Projection.

]]> By: Eric Blair http://patterico.com/2008/12/14/minnesota-senate-update/comment-page-3/#comment-435486 Eric Blair Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:42:48 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=19594#comment-435486 TMJ writes: <blockquote><i>"..Didn’t we tell you to find a new vocab word?..."</i></blockquote> "<b>We</b>"? Time to cue up the DSM. TMJ writes:

“..Didn’t we tell you to find a new vocab word?…”

“We“? Time to cue up the DSM.

]]> By: Juan http://patterico.com/2008/12/14/minnesota-senate-update/comment-page-3/#comment-435471 Juan Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:43:12 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=19594#comment-435471 "#11: Mccain voted against a deadline for leaving Iraq. Sleazy democrats attached that to the troop funding so they could attack anyone wanting a surge strategy of not funding the troops. These sleazes knew someone like you would refuse to accept reality. Mccain was always for funding the troops, and no one who is honest would ever claim otherwise. Obama was opposed to it. Period." TNJ, that isn't nasty. The democrats who took those actions are abhorrent people. Playing with lives like that for political gain is wrong. You're the one insulting me, not vice versa. I wasn't replying to you or even referring to you. You have failed to dispute any aspect of my comment because I am right. You have failed to note how I insulted you because I did not. You have insulted me in your attempt to prove I am insulting you, and you can't even admit that that comment had nothing to say about you. How odd. But it's also pretty obvious that you are attempting to destroy this thread. Patterico.com trolls almost always pull a wierd stunt to derail the thread. You have plenty of material in this thread to discuss, but pull comments from other threads that are unrelated. Why? I think because you wanted to make sure the thread became disorganized. Why did you chose a post from me? Because I wasn't involved in this thread at all, and you wanted to attack someone who wasn't present. Well, I happened upon the thread, and I'll let me argument speak for itself. Your argument is simply 'I'm right! YAY!!!' “#11: Mccain voted against a deadline for leaving Iraq. Sleazy democrats attached that to the troop funding so they could attack anyone wanting a surge strategy of not funding the troops. These sleazes knew someone like you would refuse to accept reality.

Mccain was always for funding the troops, and no one who is honest would ever claim otherwise. Obama was opposed to it. Period.”

TNJ, that isn’t nasty. The democrats who took those actions are abhorrent people. Playing with lives like that for political gain is wrong.

You’re the one insulting me, not vice versa. I wasn’t replying to you or even referring to you. You have failed to dispute any aspect of my comment because I am right. You have failed to note how I insulted you because I did not.

You have insulted me in your attempt to prove I am insulting you, and you can’t even admit that that comment had nothing to say about you.

How odd. But it’s also pretty obvious that you are attempting to destroy this thread. Patterico.com trolls almost always pull a wierd stunt to derail the thread. You have plenty of material in this thread to discuss, but pull comments from other threads that are unrelated.

Why? I think because you wanted to make sure the thread became disorganized. Why did you chose a post from me? Because I wasn’t involved in this thread at all, and you wanted to attack someone who wasn’t present.

Well, I happened upon the thread, and I’ll let me argument speak for itself. Your argument is simply ‘I’m right! YAY!!!’

]]> By: truthnjustice http://patterico.com/2008/12/14/minnesota-senate-update/comment-page-3/#comment-435470 truthnjustice Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:39:48 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=19594#comment-435470 Didn't we tell you to find a new vocab word? <blockquote> It uses the same phrases over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again, yet it still pretends to be fresh. Comment by truthnjustice — 12/16/2008 @ 2:17 pm </blockquote> Didn’t we tell you to find a new vocab word?

It uses the same phrases over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again, yet it still pretends to be fresh.

Comment by truthnjustice — 12/16/2008 @ 2:17 pm

]]> By: SPQR http://patterico.com/2008/12/14/minnesota-senate-update/comment-page-3/#comment-435468 SPQR Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:33:20 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=19594#comment-435468 Projection. Projection.

]]>