Just mark a spot, since you seem to be all Chambliss!

Now, go back into your cave,
and we’ll call for you when we think you have something important to contribute…
NOT!

Drew: Saxby my Chambliss!

Nitwit.

Oh Great Sage!
You do recall that this was (Nov 4) a 3-way race?
When there is a strong third candidate, very rarely does the favorite win a majority
(see Clinton, W.J., 1992; Nixon, R.M., 1968).

Now, go back into your cave,
and we’ll call for you when we think you have something important to contribute…
NOT!

After the nonsense in WA in 2004 and this newest episode I think we desperately need to alter these voting machines so that they print an encrypted code on the ballot somewhere when it goes through the machine that lists the time, location, and position in the tally. It wouldn’t do away with the “found” ballots, but it’d make them a hell of a lot more conspicuous.

“…I’m sure a many good ole boys were re-animated out of the nursing homes and wheeled in to the voting booths on massive doses of painkillers to get this to happen…”

All you are doing is being ridiculous. Here is a word: ACORN. Also Franken’s people “finding” more ballots than there were registered voters, trying to steal an election. The MSM out and out playing favorites. The list goes on.

Your guy won the Presidency, and your party more seats in Congress. Try to be more dignified in victory, instead of casting spurious insults that can be turned right around on you—with evidence instead of supposition.

I’ve read your posts. You are better than #24. Far better.

There was a runoff, because Chambliss, the incumbent in a deeply red state couldn’t break %50 percent wasn’t there?

Chamliss received 49.75% in the general election, substantially more than Martin’s 46% Not every state requires a majority to elect a Senator, Georgia just happens to be one of them. But your statement that the GOP had to struggle to maintain this seat is laughable.

What judicial experience has Bill Clinton had?

Does anyone else remember the enormous outcry against Clarence Thomas because he didn’t have enough bench experience? Wanna bet whether Democrats would use the same yardstick for Clinton?

Comment by Jim Treacher — 12/2/2008 @ 10:37 pm

There was a runoff, because Chambliss, the incumbent in a deeply red state couldn’t break %50 percent wasn’t there?

I’m sure a many good ole boys were re-animated out of the nursing homes and wheeled in to the voting booths on massive doses of painkillers to get this to happen.

Anyhow, can’t say much about the man as he just seems a company man, as they say, but Saxby Chambliss is just about the coolest name ever.

First, you’re welcome. Second, the issue was never in doubt here. All the hoopla was media/partisan frenzy over the possibility that the Dems could reach that ‘magic’ 60. Like on May 1st when the Cubs ‘have a shot at the Pennant’.