Your vague sentence is laughable. Drudge’s readership stems from several instances of being correct in a story that respectable ‘journalists’ like Ifill chose to ignore. Professional presentation means nothing if the underlying information is obscured or insufficiently investigated.

Coming from a humorless GOP Stooge like you Apogee, that’s a complement. Thank you.

Wrong. They do not despise these traits, otherwise they wouldn’t practice them and defend others who practice them.

These traits are their only tools for getting more power, and the projection by accusation onto political enemies is simply another diversion in order to avoid challenge.

so Ifill is a paragon of all that is right and decent about the world, while that Drudge piece of sh-it is truly vile and despicable. Try not to think about these two opposing thoughts you’ve posted in the same >thread, lest it blow your head clean off.

Believe it or not, there are people in this world who have a record of integrity and professionalism, and some who don’t.

To even mention Ifill and Drudge in the same sentence is laughable.

That’s because they can’t have a debate, DRJ. They won’t attempt to debate the issues because their positions are not defendable. This fact is highlighted by their lack of consistency, which in turn is the proof of their lack of ideals. They will simply write anything, even if it completely refutes something that they wrote just seconds ago.

Phil is an idiot who has his ass handed to him on almost every comment he makes, and Peter, in comparison, makes Phil look like Einstein.