Comments on: Republican National Convention, Day 1

By: Lord Nazh

Lord Nazh — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:46:40 +0000

Why are we in Iraq?
Okinawa was full?

By: Another Drew

Another Drew — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:36:08 +0000

Daniel…
We needed to do something to get your attention.
Now that we have it, why don’t you study the situation, and answer your own question?

By: Daniel

Daniel — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:28:15 +0000

Why are we in Iraq?

I wish Mccain could answer this one question… I don’t care about the whole host of other questions… just this one question.

By: Icy Truth

Icy Truth — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:59:21 +0000

J from DC -

– There is no “hypocrisy on conservative family values”. That you think there is exposes your astronomical illiteracy, incompetency, and outright stupidity.

By: J from DC

J from DC — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:54:41 +0000

McCain has removed the diapers off the Republican Party, exposing their astronomical incompetency, not to mention their hypocrisy on conservative family values. 4 more years of this???

By: Another Drew

Another Drew — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:25:50 +0000

Well, Hannah…
The substance for the abbreviated first day of the GOP Convention was the joint call by Laura Bush and Cyndy McCain for you to contribute to the disaster relief underway along the Gulf Coast.

If you failed to recognize that significance, perhaps it will sink in when you read it on the cover of the National Enquirer?

By: Hannah Stevens

Hannah Stevens — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:12:43 +0000

It seems that appearances are everything at the RNC convention, but where is the substance?

By: Aplomb

Aplomb — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 07:07:43 +0000

Gah . . . I don't know squat about fashion let me say that first. But I thought Laura Bush looked about 10 times better. It looked restrained, comfortable, relaxed, natural (to both her and the fibers involved) and classy. Looks like undyed natural fibers of some sort, wool probably. It wasn't a business look or a mother look per se, but it was totally a First Lady look. Kind of like taking all of them from Jackie Kennedy through Nancy Reagan (and ignoring Barbara Bush's frumpiness and Hillary's pants) and coming up with something that really suited her. No flashy jewelry, although she surely had a nice wedding ring. Just a nice elegant and modest jacket and skirt combo. Say what you will, but First Lady all the way. Cindy had a sci-fi or frat-boy popped collar, synthetic looking material in an artificial color, douchy rolled up sleeves, glittery diamond looking watch, broach and necklace, and a particulary ugly cut dress that poufs the skirt out way too much, has a waist element that is way too wide and pointless, and seems to include a hidden button or zipper arrangement that goes from the neckline to a few inches to the hem of the skirt for some incomprehensible reason. I mean seriously, who looks better in this picture? Link (Go to second pic in slideshow.)

By: Karl

Karl — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 05:50:51 +0000

Lynn Sweet is equal opportunity when it comes to appearances.

By: kimsch

kimsch — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 05:33:15 +0000

I culod raed ervey wrod taht NK wtore.

Although I do pick out the misspellings. I am a natural editor.

Didn’t want people to think that you had made the spelling error.