<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s $51M July</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2008/08/16/obamas-51m-july/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2008/08/16/obamas-51m-july/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:05:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/08/16/obamas-51m-july/comment-page-1/#comment-373218</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 21:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=11068#comment-373218</guid>
		<description>No problem, when I finish my five page treatise and start typing in caps, I&#039;ll let you know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem, when I finish my five page treatise and start typing in caps, I&#8217;ll let you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EW1(SG)</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/08/16/obamas-51m-july/comment-page-1/#comment-373214</link>
		<dc:creator>EW1(SG)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 21:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=11068#comment-373214</guid>
		<description>#23:  Yep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#23:  Yep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ropelight</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/08/16/obamas-51m-july/comment-page-1/#comment-373201</link>
		<dc:creator>Ropelight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 19:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=11068#comment-373201</guid>
		<description>#24, Anon, thanks for the scuttle butt. I&#039;m not a Moby, no, not at all, or a liberal, at least not according to common usage these days. But then today&#039;s liberals don&#039;t fit the definition they&#039;ve misapproprated for themselves either.

Once upon a time liberals were open to new ideas and concepts, not bound by onerous conviction and pc dogma, or silly fairy tales. They didn&#039;t follow false phropets, or march in parades led by charlatans. They respected the opinions of others and sought common ground, they didn&#039;t insist it had to be their way, or no way at all. Liberals didn&#039;t call names, or make-up phony excuses for their own greedy shortcomings.

It may be difficult to understand, but liberals were once considered respectable citizens and patriotic Americans. But, that&#039;s no longer the case, and our country suffers because of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#24, Anon, thanks for the scuttle butt. I&#8217;m not a Moby, no, not at all, or a liberal, at least not according to common usage these days. But then today&#8217;s liberals don&#8217;t fit the definition they&#8217;ve misapproprated for themselves either.</p>
<p>Once upon a time liberals were open to new ideas and concepts, not bound by onerous conviction and pc dogma, or silly fairy tales. They didn&#8217;t follow false phropets, or march in parades led by charlatans. They respected the opinions of others and sought common ground, they didn&#8217;t insist it had to be their way, or no way at all. Liberals didn&#8217;t call names, or make-up phony excuses for their own greedy shortcomings.</p>
<p>It may be difficult to understand, but liberals were once considered respectable citizens and patriotic Americans. But, that&#8217;s no longer the case, and our country suffers because of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/08/16/obamas-51m-july/comment-page-1/#comment-373195</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=11068#comment-373195</guid>
		<description>Moby&#039;s a liberal who pretends to be a conservative on the internet either to start fights amongst them or to say stuff to make them look bad.

It&#039;s named after some rocker who suggested liberals do that on conservative sites a couple years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moby&#8217;s a liberal who pretends to be a conservative on the internet either to start fights amongst them or to say stuff to make them look bad.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s named after some rocker who suggested liberals do that on conservative sites a couple years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/08/16/obamas-51m-july/comment-page-1/#comment-373194</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=11068#comment-373194</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ, dude - you&#039;re going to argue I&#039;m the one with hurt feelings here?  Really?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ, dude &#8211; you&#8217;re going to argue I&#8217;m the one with hurt feelings here?  Really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ropelight</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/08/16/obamas-51m-july/comment-page-1/#comment-373193</link>
		<dc:creator>Ropelight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=11068#comment-373193</guid>
		<description>Boys, boys, can&#039;t we all just get along? BTW, I&#039;m still waiting for a definition of &quot;Moby.&quot;

Now, Anon, I&#039;m not a sockpuppet, but if it&#039;s me you&#039;re lookin&#039; to pick a fight with, I&#039;m going to have to take a raincheck. Currently, my plate&#039;s full and I&#039;m in the penalty box till Monday. But, take a number and I&#039;ll get to you soon enough.

EW1(SG), I like the cut of your jib. I read your comments and I find no fault.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boys, boys, can&#8217;t we all just get along? BTW, I&#8217;m still waiting for a definition of &#8220;Moby.&#8221;</p>
<p>Now, Anon, I&#8217;m not a sockpuppet, but if it&#8217;s me you&#8217;re lookin&#8217; to pick a fight with, I&#8217;m going to have to take a raincheck. Currently, my plate&#8217;s full and I&#8217;m in the penalty box till Monday. But, take a number and I&#8217;ll get to you soon enough.</p>
<p>EW1(SG), I like the cut of your jib. I read your comments and I find no fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EW1(SG)</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/08/16/obamas-51m-july/comment-page-1/#comment-373192</link>
		<dc:creator>EW1(SG)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=11068#comment-373192</guid>
		<description>18:&lt;blockquote&gt;if you’re saying it’s good that I was non-plussed in something, I take that as you having a problem with me.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Then I suggest you reread my comment with dictionary and thesaurus at hand.

But, since I am in a particularly expansive mood today because it is an absolutely gorgeous day where I am, and because you have afforded me the first good guffaw I&#039;ve had in a week, I will restate with smaller words.

Recapping the relevant portion of the thread at hand...Ropelight posts a humorous comment...to which you, apparently at a nonplus (perhaps confused, befuddled, unsure what is meant by Ropelight&#039;s humor) respond &quot;I still can’t tell if Ropelight’s a Moby or not.&quot;  When Ropelight expresses bewilderment of (his/her) own, asking if being a Moby is a good thing; I chime in thus:  &quot;Ropelight~no, it ain’t good.&quot;  Further, since there doesn&#039;t appear to be any malice in your comment~I merely note that you didn&#039;t seem to &quot;get&quot; his joke~ &quot;But the good news is, I think Anon was just nonplussed by your humor.&quot; rather than letting him think that you were capriciously insulting.

But instead of letting it pass, or looking up a word you didn&#039;t understand...you fly off the handle and invite me to bite you, casting aspersions on my honor, integrity and courage at the same time.

So I reacted like any good ol&#039; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.creswell.k12.or.us/do/page6.html&quot; title=&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Bulldog&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://ussgray.org/&quot; title=&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Grayhound&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; would:  I bit you.

And that wasn&#039;t enough for you...you respond again with baseless insults; this time accusing &lt;i&gt;me&lt;/i&gt; of using the anonymity of the internet to aggrandize myself because of sexual deficiencies that you impute on my part.  First of all, as I have explained elsewhere about and around the internet~ EW1(SG) is a unique military title that is mine by virtue of several honorably discharged enlistments in a couple of the uniformed Naval services of the United States (of which there are four).  I do know of one other submarine qualified EW1, but he is an SS since he qualified while he was a crypto tech rather than an EW.  And I know one other sailor qualified to wear dolphins and a Coast Guard Cutterman insignia, but he was an officer, not an enlisted man, and his submarine designator was also SS.

So in all the history of naval warfare, I am the one, the only, the EW1(SG).  And there will &lt;i&gt;never&lt;/i&gt; be another, since the Navy has retired that rating.

But you continue:&lt;blockquote&gt;You’ve got far more sand in your vagina than anybody else on this thread and resorting to typos and writing in caps in your response really doesn’t do much to convince me that I am the one with “hurt” feelings here.&lt;/blockquote&gt;with the unflattering sexual innuendo, though it should be obvious by now that I cannot have a vagina, since there were never any female EWs.  Not a one.  

Although I do see there was a typo there, I seem to &quot;hve&quot; dropped a lowercase &#039;a&#039; someplace back there, and yes, I sure do seem to do a lot of SHOUTING on the Internet...you got me dead to rights, pal.
&lt;blockquote&gt; ... it will only come back to bite you -&lt;/blockquote&gt;You know, SPQR is a pretty good guy...next time, listen to him.  It&#039;s also a lot easier not to get bitten if you aren&#039;t inviting just that.
&lt;blockquote&gt;If I ruined your Sunday - sorry - but if you just want to get in a flame war, you deserve one.&lt;/blockquote&gt;No, you didn&#039;t ruin my Sunday...but you did give me a good laugh.  And yes, I probably deserve a good flame war, but you haven&#039;t got the octane to participate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>18:<br />
<blockquote>if you’re saying it’s good that I was non-plussed in something, I take that as you having a problem with me.</p></blockquote>
<p>Then I suggest you reread my comment with dictionary and thesaurus at hand.</p>
<p>But, since I am in a particularly expansive mood today because it is an absolutely gorgeous day where I am, and because you have afforded me the first good guffaw I&#8217;ve had in a week, I will restate with smaller words.</p>
<p>Recapping the relevant portion of the thread at hand&#8230;Ropelight posts a humorous comment&#8230;to which you, apparently at a nonplus (perhaps confused, befuddled, unsure what is meant by Ropelight&#8217;s humor) respond &#8220;I still can’t tell if Ropelight’s a Moby or not.&#8221;  When Ropelight expresses bewilderment of (his/her) own, asking if being a Moby is a good thing; I chime in thus:  &#8220;Ropelight~no, it ain’t good.&#8221;  Further, since there doesn&#8217;t appear to be any malice in your comment~I merely note that you didn&#8217;t seem to &#8220;get&#8221; his joke~ &#8220;But the good news is, I think Anon was just nonplussed by your humor.&#8221; rather than letting him think that you were capriciously insulting.</p>
<p>But instead of letting it pass, or looking up a word you didn&#8217;t understand&#8230;you fly off the handle and invite me to bite you, casting aspersions on my honor, integrity and courage at the same time.</p>
<p>So I reacted like any good ol&#8217; <a href="http://www.creswell.k12.or.us/do/page6.html" title="" rel="nofollow"><i>Bulldog</i></a> or <a href="http://ussgray.org/" title="" rel="nofollow"><i>Grayhound</i></a> would:  I bit you.</p>
<p>And that wasn&#8217;t enough for you&#8230;you respond again with baseless insults; this time accusing <i>me</i> of using the anonymity of the internet to aggrandize myself because of sexual deficiencies that you impute on my part.  First of all, as I have explained elsewhere about and around the internet~ EW1(SG) is a unique military title that is mine by virtue of several honorably discharged enlistments in a couple of the uniformed Naval services of the United States (of which there are four).  I do know of one other submarine qualified EW1, but he is an SS since he qualified while he was a crypto tech rather than an EW.  And I know one other sailor qualified to wear dolphins and a Coast Guard Cutterman insignia, but he was an officer, not an enlisted man, and his submarine designator was also SS.</p>
<p>So in all the history of naval warfare, I am the one, the only, the EW1(SG).  And there will <i>never</i> be another, since the Navy has retired that rating.</p>
<p>But you continue:<br />
<blockquote>You’ve got far more sand in your vagina than anybody else on this thread and resorting to typos and writing in caps in your response really doesn’t do much to convince me that I am the one with “hurt” feelings here.</p></blockquote>
<p>with the unflattering sexual innuendo, though it should be obvious by now that I cannot have a vagina, since there were never any female EWs.  Not a one.  </p>
<p>Although I do see there was a typo there, I seem to &#8220;hve&#8221; dropped a lowercase &#8216;a&#8217; someplace back there, and yes, I sure do seem to do a lot of SHOUTING on the Internet&#8230;you got me dead to rights, pal.</p>
<blockquote><p> &#8230; it will only come back to bite you -</p></blockquote>
<p>You know, SPQR is a pretty good guy&#8230;next time, listen to him.  It&#8217;s also a lot easier not to get bitten if you aren&#8217;t inviting just that.</p>
<blockquote><p>If I ruined your Sunday &#8211; sorry &#8211; but if you just want to get in a flame war, you deserve one.</p></blockquote>
<p>No, you didn&#8217;t ruin my Sunday&#8230;but you did give me a good laugh.  And yes, I probably deserve a good flame war, but you haven&#8217;t got the octane to participate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/08/16/obamas-51m-july/comment-page-1/#comment-373181</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=11068#comment-373181</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Anon, First Rule of Holes: When you find yourself in one, quit digging.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sorry, SPQR, but I still prefer the second one:  when you&#039;re in a flame war with someone, stick with tossing sophomoric insults at each other and don&#039;t attempt civility or say &quot;I might be wrong&quot;, it will only come back to bite you - unfortunately I&#039;m not the best adherent to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Anon, First Rule of Holes: When you find yourself in one, quit digging.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sorry, SPQR, but I still prefer the second one:  when you&#8217;re in a flame war with someone, stick with tossing sophomoric insults at each other and don&#8217;t attempt civility or say &#8220;I might be wrong&#8221;, it will only come back to bite you &#8211; unfortunately I&#8217;m not the best adherent to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SPQR</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/08/16/obamas-51m-july/comment-page-1/#comment-373171</link>
		<dc:creator>SPQR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=11068#comment-373171</guid>
		<description>Anon, First Rule of Holes: When you find yourself in one, quit digging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon, First Rule of Holes: When you find yourself in one, quit digging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/08/16/obamas-51m-july/comment-page-1/#comment-373156</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 15:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=11068#comment-373156</guid>
		<description>EW1(SG) — if you&#039;re saying it&#039;s good that I was non-plussed in something, I take that as you having a problem with me.

If I&#039;m wrong on that, my bad, but given your reaction to me merely saying &quot;bite me&quot; I don&#039;t think I hit too far off the mark.

You&#039;ve got far more sand in your vagina than anybody else on this thread and resorting to typos and writing in caps in your response really doesn&#039;t do much to convince me that I am the one with &quot;hurt&quot; feelings here.

If I ruined your Sunday - sorry - but if you just want to get in a flame war,  you deserve one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EW1(SG) — if you&#8217;re saying it&#8217;s good that I was non-plussed in something, I take that as you having a problem with me.</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m wrong on that, my bad, but given your reaction to me merely saying &#8220;bite me&#8221; I don&#8217;t think I hit too far off the mark.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve got far more sand in your vagina than anybody else on this thread and resorting to typos and writing in caps in your response really doesn&#8217;t do much to convince me that I am the one with &#8220;hurt&#8221; feelings here.</p>
<p>If I ruined your Sunday &#8211; sorry &#8211; but if you just want to get in a flame war,  you deserve one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
