<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Is Stunning &#8212; Kim Jong Pelosi Running House Like Hugo Chavez</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2008/08/01/this-is-stunning-kim-jong-pelosi-running-house-like-hugo-chavez/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2008/08/01/this-is-stunning-kim-jong-pelosi-running-house-like-hugo-chavez/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:18:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: allan</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/08/01/this-is-stunning-kim-jong-pelosi-running-house-like-hugo-chavez/comment-page-1/#comment-366652</link>
		<dc:creator>allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 18:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=10052#comment-366652</guid>
		<description>Ed #46:

I appreciate your thank you. You are correct on the total futures picture. I was just trying to point out that futures begin at the producer level. The producer of a commodity wants to pay his cost of production first, then lock in a profit going forward. Once he sells a contract against his production at a stipulated date, that contract can be re-sold. And you have the short side to consider. A trader can sell a futures contract in the market, or go short. He just needs a buyer. More sellers, more buyers, mean more open interest. 

I was just trying to give an overview of where the crude price drop may have been sourced. I didn&#039;t want to get into the nuts and bolts of futures in a brief comment, so you were right to make that distinction. Good catch. 

As far as markets needing more regulation...my opinion is there are plenty of regulations in place already. It&#039;s the lag or declining of enforcement of regulations that is questionable. Which I suppose one could also say concerning life in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed #46:</p>
<p>I appreciate your thank you. You are correct on the total futures picture. I was just trying to point out that futures begin at the producer level. The producer of a commodity wants to pay his cost of production first, then lock in a profit going forward. Once he sells a contract against his production at a stipulated date, that contract can be re-sold. And you have the short side to consider. A trader can sell a futures contract in the market, or go short. He just needs a buyer. More sellers, more buyers, mean more open interest. </p>
<p>I was just trying to give an overview of where the crude price drop may have been sourced. I didn&#8217;t want to get into the nuts and bolts of futures in a brief comment, so you were right to make that distinction. Good catch. </p>
<p>As far as markets needing more regulation&#8230;my opinion is there are plenty of regulations in place already. It&#8217;s the lag or declining of enforcement of regulations that is questionable. Which I suppose one could also say concerning life in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/08/01/this-is-stunning-kim-jong-pelosi-running-house-like-hugo-chavez/comment-page-1/#comment-366407</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 00:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=10052#comment-366407</guid>
		<description>DRJ, #46: &lt;blockquote&gt;Is there any principle he won’t disavow to get elected?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
NO.

  The more I watch members of the Democrat party, the more convinced I am that they will say or do anything to get elected.  And once they&#039;re elected, they just do what they want.  They conveniently ignore and drop into a black hole any previous statements or positions of them that are now &#039;inconvenient&#039;.  

Remember Pelosi&#039;s plan to cut gas prices before the 2006 elections?  Heard anything about it from any democrat since then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DRJ, #46:<br />
<blockquote>Is there any principle he won’t disavow to get elected?</p></blockquote>
<p>NO.</p>
<p>  The more I watch members of the Democrat party, the more convinced I am that they will say or do anything to get elected.  And once they&#8217;re elected, they just do what they want.  They conveniently ignore and drop into a black hole any previous statements or positions of them that are now &#8216;inconvenient&#8217;.  </p>
<p>Remember Pelosi&#8217;s plan to cut gas prices before the 2006 elections?  Heard anything about it from any democrat since then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DRJ</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/08/01/this-is-stunning-kim-jong-pelosi-running-house-like-hugo-chavez/comment-page-1/#comment-366403</link>
		<dc:creator>DRJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 00:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=10052#comment-366403</guid>
		<description>Obama now says he is &lt;a href=&quot;http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080801/D929PVL00.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;willing to support off-shore drilling&lt;/a&gt;.  That&#039;s a good decision but, frankly, I&#039;m embarrassed for him and his supporters.  Is there any principle he won&#039;t disavow to get elected?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama now says he is <a href="http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080801/D929PVL00.html" target="_blank" title="" rel="nofollow">willing to support off-shore drilling</a>.  That&#8217;s a good decision but, frankly, I&#8217;m embarrassed for him and his supporters.  Is there any principle he won&#8217;t disavow to get elected?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/08/01/this-is-stunning-kim-jong-pelosi-running-house-like-hugo-chavez/comment-page-1/#comment-366400</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 00:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=10052#comment-366400</guid>
		<description>Allan - excellent break down of the recent decline in the oil futures.  

But, I have to disagree as to your last point.  The possession of actual oil contracts.  My understanding is that much of the trading was in the nature of contracts NOT tied directly to a given physical barrel of oil.  This is a needed reform in the commodities market that makes sense to me.  If commodity trading were tied directly to a quantity of the actual commodity, and traders were made to take actual ownership (like short sellers eventually must), much of the ridiculous spike this year in oil would have been mitigated.

Anyway, thanks for the excellent explanation of where the &quot;real&quot; money was and how it began to flow away from oil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allan &#8211; excellent break down of the recent decline in the oil futures.  </p>
<p>But, I have to disagree as to your last point.  The possession of actual oil contracts.  My understanding is that much of the trading was in the nature of contracts NOT tied directly to a given physical barrel of oil.  This is a needed reform in the commodities market that makes sense to me.  If commodity trading were tied directly to a quantity of the actual commodity, and traders were made to take actual ownership (like short sellers eventually must), much of the ridiculous spike this year in oil would have been mitigated.</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for the excellent explanation of where the &#8220;real&#8221; money was and how it began to flow away from oil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Drew</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/08/01/this-is-stunning-kim-jong-pelosi-running-house-like-hugo-chavez/comment-page-1/#comment-366398</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=10052#comment-366398</guid>
		<description>Anybody know what Sorros is doing?  
Long, or Short?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody know what Sorros is doing?<br />
Long, or Short?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Myers</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/08/01/this-is-stunning-kim-jong-pelosi-running-house-like-hugo-chavez/comment-page-1/#comment-366397</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=10052#comment-366397</guid>
		<description>For what it&#039;s worth, I spent about 15 years of my legal career as a lawyer for two major West Coast oil refineries.  U.S. refiners have historically tended to ramp up production of gasoline in the spring and June, building supplies for the summer driving season when gasoline demand has, historically at least, peaked. Along about the first of July, they start to cut back on gasoline production (especially in the Mid West and Northeast) in favor of increasing the amount of home heating oil they make.  They are building stocks for the winter heating demand. 

If you think that $4 and $5 gasoline has been brutal this spring and summer (and it has been brutal) just wait until it gets cold in the Upper Midwest and Northeast this winter. 

In the mid 70s when Nixon, Ford and Carter imposed price controls and production restrictions on the U.S. petroleum industry, a favorite bumper sticker in Texas was &lt;i&gt;&quot;Let those Yankee Bastards Freeze in the Dark&quot;. &lt;/i&gt;
Well Ms. Pelosi and Harry Reid--having refused to do anything--and believing that $10 a gallon gasoline is a good thing--from an environmental perspective--are going to be responsible for a lot of frozen grannies in Massachusetts this winter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, I spent about 15 years of my legal career as a lawyer for two major West Coast oil refineries.  U.S. refiners have historically tended to ramp up production of gasoline in the spring and June, building supplies for the summer driving season when gasoline demand has, historically at least, peaked. Along about the first of July, they start to cut back on gasoline production (especially in the Mid West and Northeast) in favor of increasing the amount of home heating oil they make.  They are building stocks for the winter heating demand. </p>
<p>If you think that $4 and $5 gasoline has been brutal this spring and summer (and it has been brutal) just wait until it gets cold in the Upper Midwest and Northeast this winter. </p>
<p>In the mid 70s when Nixon, Ford and Carter imposed price controls and production restrictions on the U.S. petroleum industry, a favorite bumper sticker in Texas was <i>&#8220;Let those Yankee Bastards Freeze in the Dark&#8221;. </i><br />
Well Ms. Pelosi and Harry Reid&#8211;having refused to do anything&#8211;and believing that $10 a gallon gasoline is a good thing&#8211;from an environmental perspective&#8211;are going to be responsible for a lot of frozen grannies in Massachusetts this winter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allan</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/08/01/this-is-stunning-kim-jong-pelosi-running-house-like-hugo-chavez/comment-page-1/#comment-366395</link>
		<dc:creator>allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=10052#comment-366395</guid>
		<description>Re the recent decline of crude prices, I read dozens of commodity and stock analysts daily. The consensus of the majority is that the recent drop in oil price is the result of the large hedge fund trading desks recognizing the overbought level of crude, and consequently taking their profits and reducing their exposure at what may be an intermediate market top. And the concomitant selling panic began, hopefully for much longer for the sake of consumers and commercial interests. Some reports suggest these large spec funds have been quietly moving into gold futures. 

A common measure of overbought status in the oil market is the crude to gold spread. While gold has been in a significant uptrend since 2001, crude has gone ballistic. The spread has reached extreme levels historically speaking, and the large players have left the playing temporarily. The commodity markets are the last vestige of free markets other than the various blackmarkets around the globe. As most can see they are self-regulating. One reason that has kept the price of petroleum products at &#039;low&#039; levels has been heavily subsidized gas and diesel to consumers in such countries as Russia, Iran, and China. Those subsidies have been eroding, witness the fuel fueled riots earlier this year in two of those countries. 

The only &#039;bad&#039; news here on the crude drop is that the underlying conditions have changed little. Widely reported US recession based drop in demand is just part of the global picture. Oil is found in some very unstable regions. Something like 70% of the world&#039;s crude is controlled by nationalized corporations, or by govt bureaus directly. And the Fed and Treasury can&#039;t/won&#039;t move the dollar up at this juncture. What most people don&#039;t take into account is that while crude has become more &#039;valuable&#039;, it&#039;s also important to realize the US$ has plummeted hard. 

I&#039;m not an expert of any sort, just a mere trader,  passing on what he&#039;s read. Taking stances or opinions I will leave to the braver here. I just try to stay on top of my trades. And to preempt the &quot;speculators are horrid scum&quot; calls, without the specs you would not have any liquidity in the markets. And you do know what illiquidity gets you, right? Plus, for all those futures bought by the hedge funds, someone had to sell them the futures. [hint: maybe someone who owns some oil and is locking in a price in the future?] 

Funny how no one ever complains about the specs bringing down prices...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re the recent decline of crude prices, I read dozens of commodity and stock analysts daily. The consensus of the majority is that the recent drop in oil price is the result of the large hedge fund trading desks recognizing the overbought level of crude, and consequently taking their profits and reducing their exposure at what may be an intermediate market top. And the concomitant selling panic began, hopefully for much longer for the sake of consumers and commercial interests. Some reports suggest these large spec funds have been quietly moving into gold futures. </p>
<p>A common measure of overbought status in the oil market is the crude to gold spread. While gold has been in a significant uptrend since 2001, crude has gone ballistic. The spread has reached extreme levels historically speaking, and the large players have left the playing temporarily. The commodity markets are the last vestige of free markets other than the various blackmarkets around the globe. As most can see they are self-regulating. One reason that has kept the price of petroleum products at &#8216;low&#8217; levels has been heavily subsidized gas and diesel to consumers in such countries as Russia, Iran, and China. Those subsidies have been eroding, witness the fuel fueled riots earlier this year in two of those countries. </p>
<p>The only &#8216;bad&#8217; news here on the crude drop is that the underlying conditions have changed little. Widely reported US recession based drop in demand is just part of the global picture. Oil is found in some very unstable regions. Something like 70% of the world&#8217;s crude is controlled by nationalized corporations, or by govt bureaus directly. And the Fed and Treasury can&#8217;t/won&#8217;t move the dollar up at this juncture. What most people don&#8217;t take into account is that while crude has become more &#8216;valuable&#8217;, it&#8217;s also important to realize the US$ has plummeted hard. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not an expert of any sort, just a mere trader,  passing on what he&#8217;s read. Taking stances or opinions I will leave to the braver here. I just try to stay on top of my trades. And to preempt the &#8220;speculators are horrid scum&#8221; calls, without the specs you would not have any liquidity in the markets. And you do know what illiquidity gets you, right? Plus, for all those futures bought by the hedge funds, someone had to sell them the futures. [hint: maybe someone who owns some oil and is locking in a price in the future?] </p>
<p>Funny how no one ever complains about the specs bringing down prices&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zelsdorf Ragshaft III</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/08/01/this-is-stunning-kim-jong-pelosi-running-house-like-hugo-chavez/comment-page-1/#comment-366381</link>
		<dc:creator>Zelsdorf Ragshaft III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 22:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=10052#comment-366381</guid>
		<description>I guess if you don&#039;t have a job and you need a government payout taken from those who work, vote Democrat (communist).  Everyone else who is a productive member of society should vote their wallets and vote Republican.  It appears as though the democratic leadership in both the house and senate do not care one wit about the welfare of those who work and pay.  Send them home in November.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess if you don&#8217;t have a job and you need a government payout taken from those who work, vote Democrat (communist).  Everyone else who is a productive member of society should vote their wallets and vote Republican.  It appears as though the democratic leadership in both the house and senate do not care one wit about the welfare of those who work and pay.  Send them home in November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidL</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/08/01/this-is-stunning-kim-jong-pelosi-running-house-like-hugo-chavez/comment-page-1/#comment-366380</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 22:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=10052#comment-366380</guid>
		<description>So who is right, Barack Obama or Mrs. Pelosi?  BO declares an &quot;economic emergency&quot; and Mrs. Pelosi goes on vacation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So who is right, Barack Obama or Mrs. Pelosi?  BO declares an &#8220;economic emergency&#8221; and Mrs. Pelosi goes on vacation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scrapiron</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/08/01/this-is-stunning-kim-jong-pelosi-running-house-like-hugo-chavez/comment-page-1/#comment-366368</link>
		<dc:creator>Scrapiron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 22:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=10052#comment-366368</guid>
		<description>How can we need more oil, I put an extra pound of air in my tires today? No more problems. BWAHAHAHAHAHA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can we need more oil, I put an extra pound of air in my tires today? No more problems. BWAHAHAHAHAHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
