<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If You&#8217;re Visiting This Site from an Associated Press Story . . .</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2008/06/16/if-youre-visiting-this-site-from-an-associated-press-story/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2008/06/16/if-youre-visiting-this-site-from-an-associated-press-story/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:49:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/06/16/if-youre-visiting-this-site-from-an-associated-press-story/comment-page-1/#comment-348125</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/06/16/if-youre-visiting-this-site-from-an-associated-press-story/#comment-348125</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So Patterico, are you going to sue the AP for over-quoting your blog? Do it - make them plead &quot;fair use&quot;, it&#039;d be really funny.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Funny indeed, but as a prosecutor he can do one better: file a criminal complaint against anyone who entered the site by a link to a specific entry such as this one, but then had the audacity to truncate the URL and peek at the front page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So Patterico, are you going to sue the AP for over-quoting your blog? Do it &#8211; make them plead &#8220;fair use&#8221;, it&#8217;d be really funny.</p></blockquote>
<p>Funny indeed, but as a prosecutor he can do one better: file a criminal complaint against anyone who entered the site by a link to a specific entry such as this one, but then had the audacity to truncate the URL and peek at the front page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h2u</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/06/16/if-youre-visiting-this-site-from-an-associated-press-story/comment-page-1/#comment-348077</link>
		<dc:creator>h2u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/06/16/if-youre-visiting-this-site-from-an-associated-press-story/#comment-348077</guid>
		<description>Diggin&#039; the T-Shirt, Pat.

Any chance you could put one up that has that logo on the back?  And, ideally, in a few more colors than white.  Maybe Dodger Blue...? Or perhaps Black with the image&#039;s colors inverted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diggin&#8217; the T-Shirt, Pat.</p>
<p>Any chance you could put one up that has that logo on the back?  And, ideally, in a few more colors than white.  Maybe Dodger Blue&#8230;? Or perhaps Black with the image&#8217;s colors inverted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr T</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/06/16/if-youre-visiting-this-site-from-an-associated-press-story/comment-page-1/#comment-348076</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/06/16/if-youre-visiting-this-site-from-an-associated-press-story/#comment-348076</guid>
		<description>You got a mention on the Foxnews main page. 
here&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,367801,00.html&quot; title=&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got a mention on the Foxnews main page.<br />
here<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,367801,00.html" title="" rel="nofollow">Here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Wishard</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/06/16/if-youre-visiting-this-site-from-an-associated-press-story/comment-page-1/#comment-348073</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Wishard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/06/16/if-youre-visiting-this-site-from-an-associated-press-story/#comment-348073</guid>
		<description>So Patterico, are you going to sue the AP for over-quoting your blog?  Do it - make them plead &quot;fair use&quot;, it&#039;d be really funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Patterico, are you going to sue the AP for over-quoting your blog?  Do it &#8211; make them plead &#8220;fair use&#8221;, it&#8217;d be really funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCD</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/06/16/if-youre-visiting-this-site-from-an-associated-press-story/comment-page-1/#comment-348071</link>
		<dc:creator>PCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/06/16/if-youre-visiting-this-site-from-an-associated-press-story/#comment-348071</guid>
		<description>I wonder if Kozinski has a copy of the video where the &quot;Killer Rabbit&quot; attacks Jimmy Carter?

Would Levi and the other lefties be crying foul?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if Kozinski has a copy of the video where the &#8220;Killer Rabbit&#8221; attacks Jimmy Carter?</p>
<p>Would Levi and the other lefties be crying foul?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/06/16/if-youre-visiting-this-site-from-an-associated-press-story/comment-page-1/#comment-348049</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 07:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/06/16/if-youre-visiting-this-site-from-an-associated-press-story/#comment-348049</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=67234&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This&lt;/a&gt; is interesting.  World Nut Daily claims Ms. Tiffany wrote them the exact same letter.  They quote it extensively.  I love this quote:

&lt;blockquote&gt;One especially egregious misrepresentation is that there was a &#039;video of a half-dressed man cavorting with a sexually aroused farm animal.&#039; In subsequent articles, including one in the S.F. Chronicle, this has been described as a &#039;bestiality&#039; video. In fact … it is a widely available video of a man trying to relieve himself a field when he is attacked by a donkey he fights off with one hand while trying to hold up his pants with the other&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hmmm.  What goes in that ellipsis?

In the e-mail to ME, it was this:

&lt;blockquote&gt;In fact, &lt;b&gt;as you reveal on your Blog,&lt;/b&gt; it is a widely available video of a man trying to relieve himself a field when he is attacked by a donkey he fights off with one hand while trying to hold up his pants with the other.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I wonder what was in the excised part in the version that (they claim) she sent to them?

They quote Jem and some other commenter but never link or mention my blog.

I cannot prove, and therefore would never even suggest, that they are lying and she never wrote them.  Unless she tells me that, of course . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&#038;pageId=67234" target="_blank" title="" rel="nofollow">This</a> is interesting.  World Nut Daily claims Ms. Tiffany wrote them the exact same letter.  They quote it extensively.  I love this quote:</p>
<blockquote><p>One especially egregious misrepresentation is that there was a &#8216;video of a half-dressed man cavorting with a sexually aroused farm animal.&#8217; In subsequent articles, including one in the S.F. Chronicle, this has been described as a &#8216;bestiality&#8217; video. In fact … it is a widely available video of a man trying to relieve himself a field when he is attacked by a donkey he fights off with one hand while trying to hold up his pants with the other</p></blockquote>
<p>Hmmm.  What goes in that ellipsis?</p>
<p>In the e-mail to ME, it was this:</p>
<blockquote><p>In fact, <b>as you reveal on your Blog,</b> it is a widely available video of a man trying to relieve himself a field when he is attacked by a donkey he fights off with one hand while trying to hold up his pants with the other.</p></blockquote>
<p>I wonder what was in the excised part in the version that (they claim) she sent to them?</p>
<p>They quote Jem and some other commenter but never link or mention my blog.</p>
<p>I cannot prove, and therefore would never even suggest, that they are lying and she never wrote them.  Unless she tells me that, of course . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daleyrocks</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/06/16/if-youre-visiting-this-site-from-an-associated-press-story/comment-page-1/#comment-348047</link>
		<dc:creator>daleyrocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/06/16/if-youre-visiting-this-site-from-an-associated-press-story/#comment-348047</guid>
		<description>Even if daleyrocks didn’t really want one.


Hey, I didn&#039;t say I wouldn&#039;t buy one, but it&#039;s not my town.  I&#039;m more into generic liberal bashing.  I got a great double take from Dick Durbin and his whole posse last year at a public event wearing my 99% of Democrats Make The Rest Look Bad T-Shirt that I bought at IMAO.  The friends I went with will no longer invite me anywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if daleyrocks didn’t really want one.</p>
<p>Hey, I didn&#8217;t say I wouldn&#8217;t buy one, but it&#8217;s not my town.  I&#8217;m more into generic liberal bashing.  I got a great double take from Dick Durbin and his whole posse last year at a public event wearing my 99% of Democrats Make The Rest Look Bad T-Shirt that I bought at IMAO.  The friends I went with will no longer invite me anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JVW</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/06/16/if-youre-visiting-this-site-from-an-associated-press-story/comment-page-1/#comment-348046</link>
		<dc:creator>JVW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/06/16/if-youre-visiting-this-site-from-an-associated-press-story/#comment-348046</guid>
		<description>No no. What we need is officially licensed Patterico  &lt;a href=&quot;http://patterico.com/2006/09/13/lee-siegel-michael-hiltzik-and-rick-ellensburg/&quot; title=&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sock puppets&lt;/a&gt;.  Put me down for two of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No no. What we need is officially licensed Patterico  <a href="http://patterico.com/2006/09/13/lee-siegel-michael-hiltzik-and-rick-ellensburg/" title="" rel="nofollow">sock puppets</a>.  Put me down for two of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael scott</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/06/16/if-youre-visiting-this-site-from-an-associated-press-story/comment-page-1/#comment-348045</link>
		<dc:creator>michael scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/06/16/if-youre-visiting-this-site-from-an-associated-press-story/#comment-348045</guid>
		<description>I fail to see what is funny about the LA Times article. It is like putting a notice on someone&#039;s back, &quot;Lynch me&quot;. The LAT pretended they checked the story. With who? Hardly the family concerned. These purveyors of phony news know two things, that their sales are dropping fast and that the word &quot;porn&quot; is a good seller. Who cares about hurting people with lies when you can make a fast buck? I hope the Kozinski family take the the LAT to the cleaners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fail to see what is funny about the LA Times article. It is like putting a notice on someone&#8217;s back, &#8220;Lynch me&#8221;. The LAT pretended they checked the story. With who? Hardly the family concerned. These purveyors of phony news know two things, that their sales are dropping fast and that the word &#8220;porn&#8221; is a good seller. Who cares about hurting people with lies when you can make a fast buck? I hope the Kozinski family take the the LAT to the cleaners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DRJ</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/06/16/if-youre-visiting-this-site-from-an-associated-press-story/comment-page-1/#comment-348044</link>
		<dc:creator>DRJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/06/16/if-youre-visiting-this-site-from-an-associated-press-story/#comment-348044</guid>
		<description>Sold.  I&#039;d buy it in liberal blue, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sold.  I&#8217;d buy it in liberal blue, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
