Here’s a question for everyone who has looked at the images posted on my site from Judge Kozinski’s web site.
Are the images more offensive or less offensive than you thought they would be from the text description?
I could be wrong, but I think that on the whole, most people will say that the actual images are slightly less offensive than one would expect from a text description.
Context is key. For example, if the aroused donkey video I linked last night is truly the video described in the article, the man is not “cavorting” with the donkey. He is trying to keep the donkey away. The video attempts to be humorous, not prurient. The newspaper should have made that clear.
However. I admit to being fairly shocked when I saw some of these images for the first time late last night. The picture of the young man fellating himself was especially jarring to me, for whatever reason.
What do you think? My question goes to all the posted images.
For clarity, please begin your comment by clearly stating whether the images were more offensive, less offensive, or no different from what you been led to believe from a text description.