<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California Proposition 98 &amp; Proposition 99 &#8211; NO on both!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2008/05/29/california-proposition-98-proposition-99-no-on-both/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2008/05/29/california-proposition-98-proposition-99-no-on-both/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:01:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; California goes to the polls today on Kelo&#8211;or does it?</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/05/29/california-proposition-98-proposition-99-no-on-both/comment-page-1/#comment-344957</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; California goes to the polls today on Kelo&#8211;or does it?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 05:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/05/29/california-proposition-98-proposition-99-no-on-both/#comment-344957</guid>
		<description>[...] recommending yes on 98 and no on 99. And a while back at Patterico&#8217;s site, Justin Levine said to heck with both of &#8216;em, citing this LA Daily News [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recommending yes on 98 and no on 99. And a while back at Patterico&#8217;s site, Justin Levine said to heck with both of &#8216;em, citing this LA Daily News [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
