5/15/2008

10 Comments »

1. The suspense is killing me.

   Comment by Jem — 5/15/2008 @ 10:26 pm

2. Pellicano represented himself? I had not been following the case so that was a surprise. What the heck was he thinking?

   Comment by SPQR — 5/15/2008 @ 10:45 pm

3. Retry him on the one count he was acquitted on!

   Comment by Missed It By THAT Much — 5/15/2008 @ 11:13 pm

4. “purporting to be from someone close to the case.”

   Was it Mario G. Nitrini 111?

   Comment by LYT — 5/15/2008 @ 11:59 pm

5. LYT,

   Close.

   I have to admit, I have a new interest in Mario’s theories, and I am not kidding.

   Does that make me crazy?

   Comment by Patterico — 5/16/2008 @ 12:00 am

6. does that make me crazy?

   i had to search on mario nitrini to figure out who he was, and this insanity was link one. i don’t think you’re crazy so far, but you can see crazy from where you’re standing. is o.j. simpson involved in this somehow? sure i’d like to see you get the scoop of the new century out of this, but all too many blogscoops come out of the litter box instead of the gelato.

   Comment by assistant devil's advocate — 5/16/2008 @ 12:23 am

7. Let’s put it this way. I’m not saying Mario Nitrini is right — because I don’t really understand what the hell he’s talking about.

   But he suggests some weird relationship between Chuck Philips and Suge Knight and Anthony Pellicano — and I’m wondering whether there might not be something there.

   One thing seems clear: Chuck Philips seems to have funny relationships with Pellicano and Knight.

   Comment by Patterico — 5/16/2008 @ 12:27 am

8. For example, this post, while rather paranoid in style, actually makes a good point.

   How did Chuck Philips have an unmonitored phone call with Pellicano while Pellicano was locked up?

   I think Mario has a pretty damn good theory on that.

   Comment by Patterico — 5/16/2008 @ 12:31 am

9. Man, with pictures of these sleazeballs, it’s like something out of a Lethal Weapon movie.

   Nitrini doesn’t want you to know exactly what he’s asserting, because he’s not sure what to assert. He’s clearly aware of a lot of stuff, and is able to point out problems and hint at many others.

   I’m sure most ADAs realize that you will have a hard time unraveling any complex crime without some help from a criminal.

   Comment by Jem — 5/16/2008 @ 1:40 am

10. Hello Patrick,

    Between me and you Dude, the past is the past. Let’s leave it there. Thank you for giving me credit.

    ME AND YOU NEED TO TO TALK. No Sabatoge, Please.

    OK, Good………………..

    Last month, I had an inflamtion of my prostrate. I went to the emergency room at Tarzana hospital. After 3 hours, it was discovered that my Heart wasn’t right. I am under doctor’s care for my Heart and more.

    I will come talk to you Patrick about The Biggie Smalls Federal Lawsuit Case, Pellicano, OJ Simpson, and a whole more…………..

    I am still in Reseda. I am pretty busy playing Music for the elderly.

    I will be in touch Patrick. PLEASE, leave the PAST IN THE PAST.

    Thanks,

    The OJ Simpson Case
    The Anthony Pellicano Federal Indictment Case
    The Biggie Smalls Federal Lawsuit Case
    The Michael Jackson Case and Saga
    The Robert Blake Case and Saga

    MarioGeorgeNitrini111
    mariogeorgenitrini111
    _____________________

    The OJ Simpson case

    Comment by Mario Georrge Nirtrini 111 — 6/15/2008 @ 12:29 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment