Comments on: More on Hillary’s Campaign Finances

By: The Outlander

The Outlander — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:47:31 +0000

If this is evidence of her proposed health care plan - no thank you.

Thank you for your time.

http://theoutlander.blogstream.com

By: Jem

Jem — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 20:41:27 +0000

The dems had lots of decent candidates. I may disagree with them, but Bill Richardson, Al Gore, Joe Biden perhaps, and others could have been credible candidates.

Instead, Clinton sucked all the oxygen up so that only the least serious… the Edwards idiot, OBama with his 3 years of ‘present’ votes, etc, were left in the race to provide the impression of a race. Now that Hillary has fallen on her face, all that’s left is Obama… a guy who is pretty damn pathetic compared with other serious presidential nominees.

The GOP has had an uphill battle for a while… but the dems are doing everything they can to give this contest away.

Hillary could not be a less appealing candidate. She doesn’t even pretend to be productive or honest. She’s unpleasant sounding and has a terrible attitude. She reeks of selfishness. Any business that dealt with her had to expect the possibility of getting screwed. Same for the voters.

By: davod

davod — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:46:46 +0000

I think some of th Eem old timers are fleecing the campaign. I recall reading that Penn was getting paid millions.

By: Daryl Herbert

Daryl Herbert — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 06:43:28 +0000

Obama should pay it w/ his campaign’s money, on the condition that it be repaid when (if) Hillary pays.

He should say that he can’t stand to see dedicated, but maybe a little bit naive, young people go without health insurance.

He could have lots and lots of fun with this.

It would be an open sore on Hillary’s campaign (moreso than it is now) until she finally paid up.

By: Alta Bob

Alta Bob — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 05:52:54 +0000

Obama is right: Greedy white people.

By: Jim

Jim — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 05:46:34 +0000

From a February 3, 2008 AP report:

“WASHINGTON (AP) - Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton said Sunday she might be willing to garnish the wages of workers who refuse to buy health insurance to achieve coverage for all Americans.”

Maybe we should garnish her wages as U.S. Senator.

(Oh, but the rules never apply to those who make them)

By: j.pickens

j.pickens — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:43:07 +0000

Hey, I have Aetna health insurance for my (self owned) company. Really, I do.
Now I know I can skip paying premiums for a month or two, and my coverage won’t lapse!
Hillary’s campaign spokesman told me so.
I’ll let you guys know how that works out…

By: in_awe

in_awe — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:31:59 +0000

Its called deficit spending - its all the rage in Washington! Don’t be surprised when she announces she’s increased health care benefits for her campaign staffers.

By: Another Drew

Another Drew — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:31:57 +0000

Since she has always passed herself off as the foremost expert on what ails the health-care segment of the economy, the non-payment of her staff’s health insurance premiums will hurt the most. Hope she takes care of that before the IRS steps in (in case that health-care is not 100% employer paid).

By: Perfect Sense

Perfect Sense — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:28:37 +0000

I am beginning to think her critics are right, the “Hero of Tuzla” may not be made of Presidential timber after all.