<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: L.A. Times Issues (Inadequate) Correction on &#8220;Collaborative Relationship&#8221; Assertion in McCain Story</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2008/03/29/la-times-issues-inadequate-correction-on-collaborative-relationship-assertion-in-mccain-story/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/29/la-times-issues-inadequate-correction-on-collaborative-relationship-assertion-in-mccain-story/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:04:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Foo Bar</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/29/la-times-issues-inadequate-correction-on-collaborative-relationship-assertion-in-mccain-story/comment-page-1/#comment-330236</link>
		<dc:creator>Foo Bar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/03/29/la-times-issues-inadequate-correction-on-collaborative-relationship-assertion-in-mccain-story/#comment-330236</guid>
		<description>In your original post on this topic, you refer to what Lehman said 

&lt;i&gt;after the issuance of the staff report (the findings of which were very similar to those of the final report).&lt;/i&gt;

In the update, you say that you told Ms. Gold

&lt;i&gt;where the phrase “collaborative relationship” comes from: a “staff statement” prepared by the staff for the Commission&lt;/i&gt;

As I explained to you several days ago, the &quot;staff report&quot; and the &quot;staff statement&quot; are one and the same document. Why do you refer to it in the update as &lt;b&gt;a&lt;/b&gt; staff statement, as if it had not previously been mentioned in your post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In your original post on this topic, you refer to what Lehman said </p>
<p><i>after the issuance of the staff report (the findings of which were very similar to those of the final report).</i></p>
<p>In the update, you say that you told Ms. Gold</p>
<p><i>where the phrase “collaborative relationship” comes from: a “staff statement” prepared by the staff for the Commission</i></p>
<p>As I explained to you several days ago, the &#8220;staff report&#8221; and the &#8220;staff statement&#8221; are one and the same document. Why do you refer to it in the update as <b>a</b> staff statement, as if it had not previously been mentioned in your post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Drew</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/29/la-times-issues-inadequate-correction-on-collaborative-relationship-assertion-in-mccain-story/comment-page-1/#comment-330175</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/03/29/la-times-issues-inadequate-correction-on-collaborative-relationship-assertion-in-mccain-story/#comment-330175</guid>
		<description>Hey!  One small step, etc.
And, one wonders if the LAT even realizes the significance.
Brain-dead morons!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey!  One small step, etc.<br />
And, one wonders if the LAT even realizes the significance.<br />
Brain-dead morons!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DRJ</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/29/la-times-issues-inadequate-correction-on-collaborative-relationship-assertion-in-mccain-story/comment-page-1/#comment-330125</link>
		<dc:creator>DRJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 04:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/03/29/la-times-issues-inadequate-correction-on-collaborative-relationship-assertion-in-mccain-story/#comment-330125</guid>
		<description>I doubt many people even noticed that correction, let alone realized its significance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt many people even noticed that correction, let alone realized its significance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
