<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prediction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/prediction-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/prediction-5/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:03:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: krazy kagu</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/prediction-5/comment-page-1/#comment-330194</link>
		<dc:creator>krazy kagu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/prediction-5/#comment-330194</guid>
		<description>I wonder how many fewer readers the L.A. Slimes has</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how many fewer readers the L.A. Slimes has</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradley J. Fikes</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/prediction-5/comment-page-1/#comment-330016</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradley J. Fikes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/prediction-5/#comment-330016</guid>
		<description>Sam Zell may make the difference here. He certainly knows about the debacle. I expect he will insist on firing Philips and enforcing a meaningful code of ethics at the Times with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.laweekly.com/news/features/swallow-this-deep-throat/1763/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;no anonymous sources.&lt;/a&gt;.

One positive sign I&#039;ve noticed is that the LAT apology was so prominently displayed on the Web, and comments were posted diligently. Quite different from the see-no-evil Jamie Gold response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam Zell may make the difference here. He certainly knows about the debacle. I expect he will insist on firing Philips and enforcing a meaningful code of ethics at the Times with <a href="http://www.laweekly.com/news/features/swallow-this-deep-throat/1763/" rel="nofollow">no anonymous sources.</a>.</p>
<p>One positive sign I&#8217;ve noticed is that the LAT apology was so prominently displayed on the Web, and comments were posted diligently. Quite different from the see-no-evil Jamie Gold response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thefacts</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/prediction-5/comment-page-1/#comment-329886</link>
		<dc:creator>Thefacts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/prediction-5/#comment-329886</guid>
		<description>Pat -- Here&#039;s a legal question I&#039;m hoping you can shed some light on. It&#039;s my understanding that the forged FBI 302s were entered into a court file, presumably by Sabatino in one of his jailhouse lawsuits. Does that make them &quot;privileged&quot; under libel law, even if they are fake? And if so, does that affect Combs et al&#039;s chances of winning a libel suit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat &#8212; Here&#8217;s a legal question I&#8217;m hoping you can shed some light on. It&#8217;s my understanding that the forged FBI 302s were entered into a court file, presumably by Sabatino in one of his jailhouse lawsuits. Does that make them &#8220;privileged&#8221; under libel law, even if they are fake? And if so, does that affect Combs et al&#8217;s chances of winning a libel suit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SPQR</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/prediction-5/comment-page-1/#comment-329869</link>
		<dc:creator>SPQR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/prediction-5/#comment-329869</guid>
		<description>It is amazingly difficult to put together a libel case against a newspaper under US law.  It takes some extra effort on the part of the newspaper to expose themselves to liability.

However, the LA Times may have just given us a &quot;how-to&quot; in dropping one&#039;s drawers and asking to be sued for libel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is amazingly difficult to put together a libel case against a newspaper under US law.  It takes some extra effort on the part of the newspaper to expose themselves to liability.</p>
<p>However, the LA Times may have just given us a &#8220;how-to&#8221; in dropping one&#8217;s drawers and asking to be sued for libel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/prediction-5/comment-page-1/#comment-329868</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/prediction-5/#comment-329868</guid>
		<description>I have read some posts commending the Times for apologizing.  I read the whole article and think even less of the Times than I did before the apology.  They apologized, and IMO will soon fire Phillips, because finally somebody threatened to sue them!  Combs&#039; lawyer demanded they apologize, so they did.  I&#039;m sure they demanded Phillips&#039; head on a platter too.

They simply cannot afford to be sued for financial reasons as well as the reason they don&#039;t want their crooked editorial policies exposed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read some posts commending the Times for apologizing.  I read the whole article and think even less of the Times than I did before the apology.  They apologized, and IMO will soon fire Phillips, because finally somebody threatened to sue them!  Combs&#8217; lawyer demanded they apologize, so they did.  I&#8217;m sure they demanded Phillips&#8217; head on a platter too.</p>
<p>They simply cannot afford to be sued for financial reasons as well as the reason they don&#8217;t want their crooked editorial policies exposed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SPQR</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/prediction-5/comment-page-1/#comment-329867</link>
		<dc:creator>SPQR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/prediction-5/#comment-329867</guid>
		<description>I have a FBI 302 interview with someone high up in Hillary&#039;s campaign stating that Phillips is being considered for the VP slot.

Anonymous sources confirm the that 302 looks like it was typed on the correct size paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a FBI 302 interview with someone high up in Hillary&#8217;s campaign stating that Phillips is being considered for the VP slot.</p>
<p>Anonymous sources confirm the that 302 looks like it was typed on the correct size paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/prediction-5/comment-page-1/#comment-329851</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/prediction-5/#comment-329851</guid>
		<description>Seems I&#039;m not the only cynic, Patrick...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems I&#8217;m not the only cynic, Patrick&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amphipolis</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/prediction-5/comment-page-1/#comment-329848</link>
		<dc:creator>Amphipolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/prediction-5/#comment-329848</guid>
		<description>Pulitzer or no Pulitzer? I thought that kind of reporting was what won the Pulitzer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pulitzer or no Pulitzer? I thought that kind of reporting was what won the Pulitzer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Rather</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/prediction-5/comment-page-1/#comment-329847</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Rather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/prediction-5/#comment-329847</guid>
		<description>The documents may be forged, but the story is true!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The documents may be forged, but the story is true!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul from fl</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/prediction-5/comment-page-1/#comment-329840</link>
		<dc:creator>paul from fl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 07:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/prediction-5/#comment-329840</guid>
		<description>Pat-
 What faith you have in the Fourth Estates&#039; Managment! Misplaced faith, I&#039;ll wager. Flap and scandal sells stuff. I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if there is a slap on the wrist and the entire things just fades away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat-<br />
 What faith you have in the Fourth Estates&#8217; Managment! Misplaced faith, I&#8217;ll wager. Flap and scandal sells stuff. I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if there is a slap on the wrist and the entire things just fades away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
