<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Philips&#8217;s Use of Anonymous Sourcing on Tupac Story Was Criticized Before the Story Saw Print &#8212; But the Warning Was Ignored</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/philipss-use-of-anonymous-sourcing-on-tupac-story-was-criticized-before-the-story-saw-print-but-the-warning-was-ignored/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/philipss-use-of-anonymous-sourcing-on-tupac-story-was-criticized-before-the-story-saw-print-but-the-warning-was-ignored/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: LarryD</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/philipss-use-of-anonymous-sourcing-on-tupac-story-was-criticized-before-the-story-saw-print-but-the-warning-was-ignored/#comment-329870</link>
		<dc:creator>LarryD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/03/27/philipss-use-of-anonymous-sourcing-on-tupac-story-was-criticized-before-the-story-saw-print-but-the-warning-was-ignored/#comment-329870</guid>
		<description>The rule should be "if you can't publicly identify a source, don't print it."

Treat anonymous sources like rumors, useful for pointing you in a direction, but unpublishable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rule should be &#8220;if you can&#8217;t publicly identify a source, don&#8217;t print it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Treat anonymous sources like rumors, useful for pointing you in a direction, but unpublishable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.029 seconds -->
