<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wright&#8217;s Stance on Israel Could Cost Obama Jewish Votes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2008/03/20/wrights-stance-on-israel-could-cost-obama-jewish-votes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/20/wrights-stance-on-israel-could-cost-obama-jewish-votes/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:02:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cubanbob</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/20/wrights-stance-on-israel-could-cost-obama-jewish-votes/comment-page-2/#comment-328143</link>
		<dc:creator>cubanbob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 21:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/03/20/wrights-stance-on-israel-could-cost-obama-jewish-votes/#comment-328143</guid>
		<description>bollos de mayer: practice what you preach and go back to where ever your people came from and take a few Palestinians who have been illegally occupying Zion for the last 1400 years with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bollos de mayer: practice what you preach and go back to where ever your people came from and take a few Palestinians who have been illegally occupying Zion for the last 1400 years with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SPQR</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/20/wrights-stance-on-israel-could-cost-obama-jewish-votes/comment-page-2/#comment-328016</link>
		<dc:creator>SPQR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/03/20/wrights-stance-on-israel-could-cost-obama-jewish-votes/#comment-328016</guid>
		<description>I see this brings out the usual anti-semites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see this brings out the usual anti-semites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bollos de mayer</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/20/wrights-stance-on-israel-could-cost-obama-jewish-votes/comment-page-2/#comment-328006</link>
		<dc:creator>bollos de mayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/03/20/wrights-stance-on-israel-could-cost-obama-jewish-votes/#comment-328006</guid>
		<description>sorry, that 2nd link should be:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/the-hebron-confessions-508296.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry, that 2nd link should be:<br />
<a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/the-hebron-confessions-508296.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/the-hebron-confessions-508296.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bollos de mayer</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/20/wrights-stance-on-israel-could-cost-obama-jewish-votes/comment-page-2/#comment-328005</link>
		<dc:creator>bollos de mayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/03/20/wrights-stance-on-israel-could-cost-obama-jewish-votes/#comment-328005</guid>
		<description>zionists are murderers. full stop.

palestine was NOT available for colonisation by blue eyed &quot;jews&quot;.

they can go and live here:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/08/17/wsib17.xml

this is what they are like:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/08/17/wsib17.xml

NEVER feel sorry for zionists. NEVER.

they are jewish nazis and should be treated as such. they are just as bad for the jewish peoples as anyone..

bollos de mayer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zionists are murderers. full stop.</p>
<p>palestine was NOT available for colonisation by blue eyed &#8220;jews&#8221;.</p>
<p>they can go and live here:<br />
<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/08/17/wsib17.xml" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/08/17/wsib17.xml</a></p>
<p>this is what they are like:<br />
<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/08/17/wsib17.xml" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/08/17/wsib17.xml</a></p>
<p>NEVER feel sorry for zionists. NEVER.</p>
<p>they are jewish nazis and should be treated as such. they are just as bad for the jewish peoples as anyone..</p>
<p>bollos de mayer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cubanbob</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/20/wrights-stance-on-israel-could-cost-obama-jewish-votes/comment-page-2/#comment-327968</link>
		<dc:creator>cubanbob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 06:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/03/20/wrights-stance-on-israel-could-cost-obama-jewish-votes/#comment-327968</guid>
		<description>&quot;so you did, DRJ. But I was thinking of the overall reaction here, and at the other couple of sites I visit regularly. It’s almost as if conservatives are afraid of arguing for their ideas. They’d rather label individuals as anti-American, defeatist, and so forth (even when they’re merely repeating memes going the round of the dextrosphere that don’t necessarily match the reality of what the individual is doing/saying) than state in plain English why the ideas are wrong. 

The Obama speech is a good case of this: instead of seizing on the point that Obama wanted to put across–that we must all let big government solve the problems that slavery still (allegedly) causes–and showing how wrong it is and how it merely echoes the same old same old thing that’s been going on for the last thirty odd years–it’s attacked for every other reason. Now some of them are good reasons–like the fact that Obama didn’t choose to criticize Wright for the first 22 years he attended that church–but some of them are dubious (like the idea that he shares Wright’s anti-Semitism and black nationalism, for which there is no hard evidence and which is contradicted by Obama’s public statements rather consistently) and won’t win any points with people who haven’t made up their minds. 

Just because politics has operated like this for the past few decades does not mean we have to play by the same rules.

Comment by kishnevi — 3/20/2008 @ 7:20 pm &quot;

Hate to burst your bubble but the best judge of a person&#039;s character and beliefs is watching their conduct and actions and not just going by their words. At best Obama is a deeply cynical politician &quot;making his bones&quot; in the Chicago African-American community for his political purposes and unwilling to blow his credibility among that constituency and foregoing any political future. Or he buys in to it. Either way he is unfit to be Head of State, Head of Government and Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States. At best he will ultimately wind up as a Congressman from the Chicago area. 
As for the big government/socialist clap-trap, that is just tired old sixties crap. Still he just might have done the nation a favor. By exposing the Black Nationalist nonsense the next Congress just might be willing to start reigning in &quot;entitlement&quot; spending.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;so you did, DRJ. But I was thinking of the overall reaction here, and at the other couple of sites I visit regularly. It’s almost as if conservatives are afraid of arguing for their ideas. They’d rather label individuals as anti-American, defeatist, and so forth (even when they’re merely repeating memes going the round of the dextrosphere that don’t necessarily match the reality of what the individual is doing/saying) than state in plain English why the ideas are wrong. </p>
<p>The Obama speech is a good case of this: instead of seizing on the point that Obama wanted to put across–that we must all let big government solve the problems that slavery still (allegedly) causes–and showing how wrong it is and how it merely echoes the same old same old thing that’s been going on for the last thirty odd years–it’s attacked for every other reason. Now some of them are good reasons–like the fact that Obama didn’t choose to criticize Wright for the first 22 years he attended that church–but some of them are dubious (like the idea that he shares Wright’s anti-Semitism and black nationalism, for which there is no hard evidence and which is contradicted by Obama’s public statements rather consistently) and won’t win any points with people who haven’t made up their minds. </p>
<p>Just because politics has operated like this for the past few decades does not mean we have to play by the same rules.</p>
<p>Comment by kishnevi — 3/20/2008 @ 7:20 pm &#8221;</p>
<p>Hate to burst your bubble but the best judge of a person&#8217;s character and beliefs is watching their conduct and actions and not just going by their words. At best Obama is a deeply cynical politician &#8220;making his bones&#8221; in the Chicago African-American community for his political purposes and unwilling to blow his credibility among that constituency and foregoing any political future. Or he buys in to it. Either way he is unfit to be Head of State, Head of Government and Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States. At best he will ultimately wind up as a Congressman from the Chicago area.<br />
As for the big government/socialist clap-trap, that is just tired old sixties crap. Still he just might have done the nation a favor. By exposing the Black Nationalist nonsense the next Congress just might be willing to start reigning in &#8220;entitlement&#8221; spending.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveG</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/20/wrights-stance-on-israel-could-cost-obama-jewish-votes/comment-page-2/#comment-327966</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/03/20/wrights-stance-on-israel-could-cost-obama-jewish-votes/#comment-327966</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious to know why Wright isn&#039;t all pissed off at the Arab/Muslim slave traders that pioneered slave trafficking in Africa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious to know why Wright isn&#8217;t all pissed off at the Arab/Muslim slave traders that pioneered slave trafficking in Africa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve miller</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/20/wrights-stance-on-israel-could-cost-obama-jewish-votes/comment-page-2/#comment-327965</link>
		<dc:creator>steve miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/03/20/wrights-stance-on-israel-could-cost-obama-jewish-votes/#comment-327965</guid>
		<description>For all his faults - which center around his appalling lack of judgment - Barry&#039;s no Muslim. I don&#039;t think he&#039;s a communist, either. He&#039;s just a good old-fashioned liberal who steps on old people to get to the top.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all his faults &#8211; which center around his appalling lack of judgment &#8211; Barry&#8217;s no Muslim. I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s a communist, either. He&#8217;s just a good old-fashioned liberal who steps on old people to get to the top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cubanbob</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/20/wrights-stance-on-israel-could-cost-obama-jewish-votes/comment-page-2/#comment-327964</link>
		<dc:creator>cubanbob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/03/20/wrights-stance-on-israel-could-cost-obama-jewish-votes/#comment-327964</guid>
		<description>&quot; “Phil &amp; co. believe an anti-American, black nationalist, cryptic- Muslim communist is going to get elected President of the United States.”

- cubanbob

Why not? We’re open-minded people, and the Black Panthers were baaaadaaaaaaaassss!

Nice handle, by the way. I’m sure an entire ethnicity likes being stereotyped as morons based on the ill-advised, half-baked flounderings of some anonymous troll.

Comment by Leviticus — 3/20/2008 @ 6:52 pm &quot;

Panthers were indeed baaadaass...as for moron your silly snark is proof positive of moronic tendencies. Have your doctor proscribe you a heavy duty pain-killer,anti-psychotic and anti-nausea medications the day before the general election. Your going to need them. 40 states, 45 states or 49 states? Wonder what the Vegas odds makers are offering. Hillary is a left wing Nixon but without the charm and not as smart and Obama another race hustler and communist albeit more charming than J. Jackson. I doubt that even McCain can blow this election. The Democrats are going to give us a remix of 1968 and 1972. The only real questions are will the Republicans win a trifecta in-spite of themselves and will the Party of Marx and Treason provide us a riot at their convention for our entertainment value? Please do. TV has been so boring of late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; “Phil &amp; co. believe an anti-American, black nationalist, cryptic- Muslim communist is going to get elected President of the United States.”</p>
<p>- cubanbob</p>
<p>Why not? We’re open-minded people, and the Black Panthers were baaaadaaaaaaaassss!</p>
<p>Nice handle, by the way. I’m sure an entire ethnicity likes being stereotyped as morons based on the ill-advised, half-baked flounderings of some anonymous troll.</p>
<p>Comment by Leviticus — 3/20/2008 @ 6:52 pm &#8221;</p>
<p>Panthers were indeed baaadaass&#8230;as for moron your silly snark is proof positive of moronic tendencies. Have your doctor proscribe you a heavy duty pain-killer,anti-psychotic and anti-nausea medications the day before the general election. Your going to need them. 40 states, 45 states or 49 states? Wonder what the Vegas odds makers are offering. Hillary is a left wing Nixon but without the charm and not as smart and Obama another race hustler and communist albeit more charming than J. Jackson. I doubt that even McCain can blow this election. The Democrats are going to give us a remix of 1968 and 1972. The only real questions are will the Republicans win a trifecta in-spite of themselves and will the Party of Marx and Treason provide us a riot at their convention for our entertainment value? Please do. TV has been so boring of late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Drew</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/20/wrights-stance-on-israel-could-cost-obama-jewish-votes/comment-page-2/#comment-327963</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/03/20/wrights-stance-on-israel-could-cost-obama-jewish-votes/#comment-327963</guid>
		<description>Argh!  &quot;argue&quot;, not arguer.  Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Argh!  &#8220;argue&#8221;, not arguer.  Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve miller</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/03/20/wrights-stance-on-israel-could-cost-obama-jewish-votes/comment-page-2/#comment-327962</link>
		<dc:creator>steve miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/03/20/wrights-stance-on-israel-could-cost-obama-jewish-votes/#comment-327962</guid>
		<description>Gee, I wonder what SNL will talk about this week? I&#039;m guessing we&#039;ll have a &quot;throw Granny under the bus&quot; skit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, I wonder what SNL will talk about this week? I&#8217;m guessing we&#8217;ll have a &#8220;throw Granny under the bus&#8221; skit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
