Comments on: Was Linda Greenhouse’s Exit Hastened by Ed Whelan’s Questions? http://patterico.com/2008/02/29/was-linda-greenhouses-exit-hastened-by-ed-whelans-questions/ Harangues that just make sense Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:28:31 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: rhodeymark http://patterico.com/2008/02/29/was-linda-greenhouses-exit-hastened-by-ed-whelans-questions/#comment-323157 rhodeymark Sat, 01 Mar 2008 15:26:00 +0000 http://patterico.com/2008/02/29/was-linda-greenhouses-exit-hastened-by-ed-whelans-questions/#comment-323157 Greenhouse gasses bad New York Times stops emissions World cool again Greenhouse gasses bad
New York Times stops emissions
World cool again

]]> By: vnjagvet http://patterico.com/2008/02/29/was-linda-greenhouses-exit-hastened-by-ed-whelans-questions/#comment-323050 vnjagvet Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:43:08 +0000 http://patterico.com/2008/02/29/was-linda-greenhouses-exit-hastened-by-ed-whelans-questions/#comment-323050 Advocacy pieces belong on Op-Ed pages. Hard news items covering SCOTUS should have the appearance of fairness. Advocacy pieces belong on Op-Ed pages. Hard news items covering SCOTUS should have the appearance of fairness.

]]> By: stevesturm http://patterico.com/2008/02/29/was-linda-greenhouses-exit-hastened-by-ed-whelans-questions/#comment-323038 stevesturm Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:48:07 +0000 http://patterico.com/2008/02/29/was-linda-greenhouses-exit-hastened-by-ed-whelans-questions/#comment-323038 Why presume that Greenhouse cares about what the Public Editor thinks? The guy has no power, is ignored by management, and the position is widely viewed as nothing more than a sop thrown to conservative critics. Why presume that Greenhouse cares about what the Public Editor thinks? The guy has no power, is ignored by management, and the position is widely viewed as nothing more than a sop thrown to conservative critics.

]]> By: reff http://patterico.com/2008/02/29/was-linda-greenhouses-exit-hastened-by-ed-whelans-questions/#comment-322957 reff Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:48:36 +0000 http://patterico.com/2008/02/29/was-linda-greenhouses-exit-hastened-by-ed-whelans-questions/#comment-322957 Like most conservatives I know, and most of you here, I took the time to read Lithwick's Slate article, where she pointed out that when Greenhouse got called out for her views by NPR. And, now, I have no doubt in my mind that Greenhouse is bias in her reporting, and her opinion, and that of her husband, clouds her writings. She could not possibly be more biased in her reportings, since she publically stated her views on the things she reported on in her Harvard speech. I fully understand that reporters will have opinions about the things they report on, but, keeping their biases private, or in lieu of that, openly reporting the possible conflicts would give readers a clear picture of that being reported. Greenhouse didn't/couldn't, and Lithwick seems to think that it is ok... No wonder I don't read the Times, except when you guys/gals here make me do it.... Like most conservatives I know, and most of you here, I took the time to read Lithwick’s Slate article, where she pointed out that when Greenhouse got called out for her views by NPR.

And, now, I have no doubt in my mind that Greenhouse is bias in her reporting, and her opinion, and that of her husband, clouds her writings. She could not possibly be more biased in her reportings, since she publically stated her views on the things she reported on in her Harvard speech.

I fully understand that reporters will have opinions about the things they report on, but, keeping their biases private, or in lieu of that, openly reporting the possible conflicts would give readers a clear picture of that being reported. Greenhouse didn’t/couldn’t, and Lithwick seems to think that it is ok…

No wonder I don’t read the Times, except when you guys/gals here make me do it….

]]>