Patterico’s Pontifications

2/21/2008

So Far As I Can Tell, The NYT Never Ran A Story On The Rumor That Hillary Might Have, Allegedly, Had A Relationship With An Aide Which Was Possibly Sexual, According To Sources Who Were Anonymous, But Said To Have Been Close To At Least One Former Aide Of A Staffer Who Once Drove Chelsea To The Airport

Filed under: General — WLS @ 11:19 am

But I hear the NTY is still trying to run the facts down.

If Hillary is elected President, they expect to have it nailed down to the comfort of their editors in January 2017.

13 Comments

  1. hillary voters don’t care if she gets some hot lesbian action from her body-slave, and her husband is out doing his own rooster thing.

    Comment by assistant devil's advocate — 2/21/2008 @ 11:38 am

  2. But I hear the NTY is still trying to run the facts down.

    The New York Time wouldn’t recognize a fact if it stared them in the face.

    Fraud and malice come’s to mind if this is the best Keller and Co. can come up with.

    Comment by Rovin — 2/21/2008 @ 11:42 am

  3. I’m sure it’s because the Times thinks Hillary is so yesterday, WLS … and your title is great.

    Comment by DRJ — 2/21/2008 @ 12:35 pm

  4. Apparently the story couldn’t live up to the standards of the gossip columns section.

    Comment by J. Peden — 2/21/2008 @ 12:37 pm

  5. At least [Hillary] Clinton’s aide is hot. McCain’s Lobbying Lover looks like the Joker.

    Comment by Leviticus — 2/21/2008 @ 12:46 pm

  6. ROFLAO Sarcasm ill becomes you. :-) As for the NYT, it is really sad to watch what was once a great newspaper try to morph itself into a National Inquirer wanna-be.

    Comment by Fritz — 2/21/2008 @ 1:02 pm

  7. I dunno… I gotta go with Levi on this one…

    At least in regards to the Lobbyist… *shudder*

    Comment by Scott Jacobs — 2/21/2008 @ 1:38 pm

  8. I would really, really like to know what is being said about the NYT in the executive offices, and around the water coolers of the major newpapers in America today.

    Comment by elizabeth — 2/21/2008 @ 2:06 pm

  9. was it really that great of a paper? Or was it that the public didn’t have the means to root out the bullshit that it fed them?

    Comment by gabriel — 2/21/2008 @ 2:10 pm

  10. Hillary did Foster, all the way to the park. :)

    Comment by TC — 2/21/2008 @ 4:03 pm

  11. Don’t forget Edwards. Just google Edwards Affair (or something like that, I did this last night) and then McCain Affair and compare the links. Edwards’ links are National Enquirer and Bloggers. McCain’s links are MSM.

    The Times’ plays it as straight as a pool cue left out in the rain.

    Comment by Sweetie — 2/21/2008 @ 4:08 pm

  12. Here’s your answer, gabriel #9:

    From the paper of record:

    “Still, to be filled with uneasy wonder and express it will be safe enough, for after the rocket quits our air and and really starts on its longer journey, its flight would be neither accelerated nor maintained by the explosion of the charges it then might have left. To claim that it would be is to deny a fundamental law of dynamics, and only Dr. Einstein and his chosen dozen, so few and fit, are licensed to do that.
    His Plan Is Not Original
    That Professor Goddard, with his “chair” in Clark College and the countenancing of the Smithsonian Institution, does not know the relation of action to reaction, and of the need to have something better than a vacuum against which to react–to say that would be absurd. Of course he only seems to lack the knowledge ladled out daily in high schools.”

    Link to whole thing. Scroll down a little.

    Comment by nk — 2/21/2008 @ 4:37 pm

  13. Hillary did Foster, all the way to the park

    That explains his suicide… I’d kill myself after seeing Hillary in the nude too…

    Comment by Scott Jacobs — 2/21/2008 @ 5:35 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Powered by WordPress.