<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NBC Calls New Hampshire for Hillary; UPDATE: So Does Fox News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2008/01/08/nbc-calls-new-hampshire-for-hillary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2008/01/08/nbc-calls-new-hampshire-for-hillary/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:42:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: no one you know</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/01/08/nbc-calls-new-hampshire-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-313332</link>
		<dc:creator>no one you know</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/01/08/nbc-calls-new-hampshire-for-hillary/#comment-313332</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;the person in question IS capable of interesting and thoughtful commentary. Then it turns into more poo flinging.&lt;/i&gt;

Lurker: yep, exactly. Thanks for the reminders lately to people BTW.  This is a great politics etc. site and it&#039;s good to see EVERYONE&#039;s views, provided they&#039;re 
-honestly expressed, i.e. not offered from ego or attention grabs, and 
-on the proper topics of the threads. 

Off to another task.  See y&#039;all soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>the person in question IS capable of interesting and thoughtful commentary. Then it turns into more poo flinging.</i></p>
<p>Lurker: yep, exactly. Thanks for the reminders lately to people BTW.  This is a great politics etc. site and it&#8217;s good to see EVERYONE&#8217;s views, provided they&#8217;re<br />
-honestly expressed, i.e. not offered from ego or attention grabs, and<br />
-on the proper topics of the threads. </p>
<p>Off to another task.  See y&#8217;all soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lurker</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/01/08/nbc-calls-new-hampshire-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-313329</link>
		<dc:creator>Lurker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/01/08/nbc-calls-new-hampshire-for-hillary/#comment-313329</guid>
		<description>Hey, NOYK:  the person is question IS capable of interesting and thoughtful commentary.  Then it turns into more poo flinging.  Oh well.  Maybe a &quot;good twin - evil twin&quot; business at the keyboard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, NOYK:  the person is question IS capable of interesting and thoughtful commentary.  Then it turns into more poo flinging.  Oh well.  Maybe a &#8220;good twin &#8211; evil twin&#8221; business at the keyboard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no one you know</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/01/08/nbc-calls-new-hampshire-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-313327</link>
		<dc:creator>no one you know</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/01/08/nbc-calls-new-hampshire-for-hillary/#comment-313327</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;David Ehrenstein, on the other hand, is on topic in another thread, if I’m not mistaken, and doing very well actually 1) staying on topic, and 2) contributing to the discussion. I suggest that he return there.&lt;/i&gt;

Hmm, just popped over to the thread in question and perhaps I spoke too soon.  Perhaps.  We&#039;ll see what happens, I guess.  Whether &lt;i&gt;David Ehrenstein&lt;/i&gt; or &lt;i&gt;the attention hound &lt;/i&gt;will win is up to him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>David Ehrenstein, on the other hand, is on topic in another thread, if I’m not mistaken, and doing very well actually 1) staying on topic, and 2) contributing to the discussion. I suggest that he return there.</i></p>
<p>Hmm, just popped over to the thread in question and perhaps I spoke too soon.  Perhaps.  We&#8217;ll see what happens, I guess.  Whether <i>David Ehrenstein</i> or <i>the attention hound </i>will win is up to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no one you know</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/01/08/nbc-calls-new-hampshire-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-313320</link>
		<dc:creator>no one you know</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/01/08/nbc-calls-new-hampshire-for-hillary/#comment-313320</guid>
		<description>Once again &lt;i&gt;the attention hound &lt;/i&gt; ignores others who have expressed the same opinion as I have, to focus on my opinion only.  He&#039;s so &lt;i&gt;attentive.&lt;/i&gt;  Maybe he&#039;ll ask me for my &lt;b&gt;real-life name &lt;/b&gt;again today!  You know, the one his superior intelligence tricked out of me so fast the other day.  LOLOL  

&lt;i&gt;David Ehrenstein&lt;/i&gt;, on the other hand, is on topic in another thread, if I&#039;m not mistaken, and doing very well actually 1) staying on topic, and 2) contributing to the discussion.  I suggest that he return there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again <i>the attention hound </i> ignores others who have expressed the same opinion as I have, to focus on my opinion only.  He&#8217;s so <i>attentive.</i>  Maybe he&#8217;ll ask me for my <b>real-life name </b>again today!  You know, the one his superior intelligence tricked out of me so fast the other day.  LOLOL  </p>
<p><i>David Ehrenstein</i>, on the other hand, is on topic in another thread, if I&#8217;m not mistaken, and doing very well actually 1) staying on topic, and 2) contributing to the discussion.  I suggest that he return there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reff</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/01/08/nbc-calls-new-hampshire-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-313319</link>
		<dc:creator>reff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/01/08/nbc-calls-new-hampshire-for-hillary/#comment-313319</guid>
		<description>David, MJFox was staged...he stated himself later that he deliberately did not take medications before the interviews on TV.

Google it; Google is your friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, MJFox was staged&#8230;he stated himself later that he deliberately did not take medications before the interviews on TV.</p>
<p>Google it; Google is your friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ehrenstein</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/01/08/nbc-calls-new-hampshire-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-313316</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ehrenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/01/08/nbc-calls-new-hampshire-for-hillary/#comment-313316</guid>
		<description>Do you think Michael J. Fox&#039;s shaking was staged too, &lt;i&gt;no one you know&lt;/i&gt; ?

That&#039;s what Rush says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think Michael J. Fox&#8217;s shaking was staged too, <i>no one you know</i> ?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what Rush says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lurker</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/01/08/nbc-calls-new-hampshire-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-313313</link>
		<dc:creator>Lurker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/01/08/nbc-calls-new-hampshire-for-hillary/#comment-313313</guid>
		<description>On the other hand, David E. is on record as claiming to never voting at all.  To some, that might suggest this allows him to always vote for the winner!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the other hand, David E. is on record as claiming to never voting at all.  To some, that might suggest this allows him to always vote for the winner!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chaos</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/01/08/nbc-calls-new-hampshire-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-313290</link>
		<dc:creator>chaos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/01/08/nbc-calls-new-hampshire-for-hillary/#comment-313290</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Who does Massa think I should vote for?&lt;/blockquote&gt;


RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRON PAUL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Who does Massa think I should vote for?</p></blockquote>
<p>RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRON PAUL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no one you know</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/01/08/nbc-calls-new-hampshire-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-313273</link>
		<dc:creator>no one you know</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/01/08/nbc-calls-new-hampshire-for-hillary/#comment-313273</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;3. They never factored in abortion, the only issue for feminists, old and young.&lt;/i&gt;

Excellent point.  Obama is proabortion too; however, both the Clintons&#039; reputation precedes them on the &quot;choice&quot; issue.  

&lt;i&gt;Did Hillary cry her way to victory?&lt;/i&gt;

IMO this &lt;i&gt;was&lt;/i&gt; a factor in her victory.  Not the only one, but one of them.   Whether it was staged or not (IMO it was), it softened her negative projected image which was: &quot;unlikeable and cold.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>3. They never factored in abortion, the only issue for feminists, old and young.</i></p>
<p>Excellent point.  Obama is proabortion too; however, both the Clintons&#8217; reputation precedes them on the &#8220;choice&#8221; issue.  </p>
<p><i>Did Hillary cry her way to victory?</i></p>
<p>IMO this <i>was</i> a factor in her victory.  Not the only one, but one of them.   Whether it was staged or not (IMO it was), it softened her negative projected image which was: &#8220;unlikeable and cold.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ehrenstein</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2008/01/08/nbc-calls-new-hampshire-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-313264</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ehrenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2008/01/08/nbc-calls-new-hampshire-for-hillary/#comment-313264</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;If I were Black I’d vote for only one guy: Al Sharpton.&quot;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That just shows how white you are, Howard.

I&#039;m black and I&#039;m not voting for Obama. 

Who does &lt;i&gt;Massa&lt;/i&gt; think I should vote for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;If I were Black I’d vote for only one guy: Al Sharpton.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>That just shows how white you are, Howard.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m black and I&#8217;m not voting for Obama. </p>
<p>Who does <i>Massa</i> think I should vote for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
