<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NASA Releases NAOMS Airline Safety Study</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2007/12/31/nasa-releases-naoms-airline-safety-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2007/12/31/nasa-releases-naoms-airline-safety-study/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Worse than real estate law</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/12/31/nasa-releases-naoms-airline-safety-study/#comment-364585</link>
		<dc:creator>Worse than real estate law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/12/31/nasa-releases-naoms-airline-safety-study/#comment-364585</guid>
		<description>This article and the study are worse gobbygook than the council meetings at Winnipeg Beach
Its impossible to decipher - even if you legalease
Seems it was meant to confuse
My mortgage papers from my real estate lawyer are easier to understand than this
Go jump in the lake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article and the study are worse gobbygook than the council meetings at Winnipeg Beach<br />
Its impossible to decipher - even if you legalease<br />
Seems it was meant to confuse<br />
My mortgage papers from my real estate lawyer are easier to understand than this<br />
Go jump in the lake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Friedman</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/12/31/nasa-releases-naoms-airline-safety-study/#comment-311704</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Friedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 15:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/12/31/nasa-releases-naoms-airline-safety-study/#comment-311704</guid>
		<description>Just read the results of the free response question that ends at the end of the Section C landing and approach questions for commercial pilots.  At least 3/4 of the pilots experienced fast, hard landings or had difficulty getting in trim for landing or had to make changes to flight computers that reduced situational awareness.  It seems clear that approach and landing, especially at busy, hub airports with parallel runways, are the chokepoint where the lack of experienced controllers and overworked pilots combine to reduce airline safety.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just read the results of the free response question that ends at the end of the Section C landing and approach questions for commercial pilots.  At least 3/4 of the pilots experienced fast, hard landings or had difficulty getting in trim for landing or had to make changes to flight computers that reduced situational awareness.  It seems clear that approach and landing, especially at busy, hub airports with parallel runways, are the chokepoint where the lack of experienced controllers and overworked pilots combine to reduce airline safety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helidoc</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/12/31/nasa-releases-naoms-airline-safety-study/#comment-311486</link>
		<dc:creator>Helidoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 15:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/12/31/nasa-releases-naoms-airline-safety-study/#comment-311486</guid>
		<description>One of the features of this study that is not being told is that the act of turning in a record of the "incident" makes you immune from FAA enforcement. This means that everyone in aviation has every reason to "Report" all of these incidents. Airlines gave out these report cards to their pilots, and instructed them to fill these out whenever they had doubts about what happened. Now we are going to make  regulations from this, absolutely Ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the features of this study that is not being told is that the act of turning in a record of the &#8220;incident&#8221; makes you immune from FAA enforcement. This means that everyone in aviation has every reason to &#8220;Report&#8221; all of these incidents. Airlines gave out these report cards to their pilots, and instructed them to fill these out whenever they had doubts about what happened. Now we are going to make  regulations from this, absolutely Ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Drew</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/12/31/nasa-releases-naoms-airline-safety-study/#comment-311428</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 01:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/12/31/nasa-releases-naoms-airline-safety-study/#comment-311428</guid>
		<description>It will be very interesting to see if the relevant committees in Congress hold hearings on this report in any meaningful manner.
The good thing is, that they only spent $11.3M of our money on this.  I think that's less than their coffee budget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be very interesting to see if the relevant committees in Congress hold hearings on this report in any meaningful manner.<br />
The good thing is, that they only spent $11.3M of our money on this.  I think that&#8217;s less than their coffee budget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
