<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary Clinton&#8217;s Mixed Message (Updated)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2007/12/20/hillary-clintons-mixed-message/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2007/12/20/hillary-clintons-mixed-message/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 05:40:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: M. Morcom</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/12/20/hillary-clintons-mixed-message/comment-page-1/#comment-345265</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Morcom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/12/20/hillary-clintons-mixed-message/#comment-345265</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;&lt;/b&gt;I think that it&#039;s time for you to QUIT and get your 18,000,000 to support and vote for Barack Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b></b>I think that it&#8217;s time for you to QUIT and get your 18,000,000 to support and vote for Barack Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: red</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/12/20/hillary-clintons-mixed-message/comment-page-1/#comment-308902</link>
		<dc:creator>red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 06:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/12/20/hillary-clintons-mixed-message/#comment-308902</guid>
		<description>My naaa naaaa gimmeee pretty presents for Christmas. 

I want.  

So nice my naa naaaa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My naaa naaaa gimmeee pretty presents for Christmas. </p>
<p>I want.  </p>
<p>So nice my naa naaaa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buzz</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/12/20/hillary-clintons-mixed-message/comment-page-1/#comment-308867</link>
		<dc:creator>buzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 03:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/12/20/hillary-clintons-mixed-message/#comment-308867</guid>
		<description>Looks like the perfect Republican ad should she get the nomination.  Just quick cut it with &quot;average American&quot; billfold with the government hand removing money for each present put under the tree.  And yeah, universal pre-K.  What the hell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the perfect Republican ad should she get the nomination.  Just quick cut it with &#8220;average American&#8221; billfold with the government hand removing money for each present put under the tree.  And yeah, universal pre-K.  What the hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/12/20/hillary-clintons-mixed-message/comment-page-1/#comment-308859</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 03:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/12/20/hillary-clintons-mixed-message/#comment-308859</guid>
		<description>&quot;All your children are belong to us!&quot;

Universal Pre-K?  That&#039;s a new one.  And creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;All your children are belong to us!&#8221;</p>
<p>Universal Pre-K?  That&#8217;s a new one.  And creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retire05</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/12/20/hillary-clintons-mixed-message/comment-page-1/#comment-308857</link>
		<dc:creator>retire05</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/12/20/hillary-clintons-mixed-message/#comment-308857</guid>
		<description>Pretty packages wrapped up to hide the ugly truth.  And in &#039;gold&#039; and &#039;green&#039;.  Subliminal message from Hillary telling us that is the last we will see of our green if she takes the gold or does it mean that the Clintons will be rolling in more gold and green with all those rental fees from the Lincoln bedroom coming in?

There once was an old woman who lived by in a Hsu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty packages wrapped up to hide the ugly truth.  And in &#8216;gold&#8217; and &#8216;green&#8217;.  Subliminal message from Hillary telling us that is the last we will see of our green if she takes the gold or does it mean that the Clintons will be rolling in more gold and green with all those rental fees from the Lincoln bedroom coming in?</p>
<p>There once was an old woman who lived by in a Hsu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/12/20/hillary-clintons-mixed-message/comment-page-1/#comment-308820</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/12/20/hillary-clintons-mixed-message/#comment-308820</guid>
		<description>A bit off topic -- OK, a lot off topic.

While reading the above entry I was struck by the reference to a Senator&#039;s party and state. I wondered, what would you get if you pronounced the two references as a single word?

Barbara Boxer, Democrat from California is referred to as a D-Ca, which could be pronounced as Dee Kaw or Dee Kuh. Not that scintilating, but let&#039;s try a couple more.

Sherrod Brown (D - Oh) would be the Homer Simpson Senator (D&#039;oh). My Senator, Patty Murray (D- Wa) would be Dee WAAA or Dee Wah. Senator Tom Coburn (R - Ok) would be Rock. Larry Craig (R - ID) would of course be RID. John McCain (R - Az) would be RAZ.

And Hilary Rodham Clinton (D - NY) would be Dee-NY or just Deny. 

Yeah, I&#039;ve got a warped sense of humor, but I do enjoy it. What would your Senator be?

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit off topic &#8212; OK, a lot off topic.</p>
<p>While reading the above entry I was struck by the reference to a Senator&#8217;s party and state. I wondered, what would you get if you pronounced the two references as a single word?</p>
<p>Barbara Boxer, Democrat from California is referred to as a D-Ca, which could be pronounced as Dee Kaw or Dee Kuh. Not that scintilating, but let&#8217;s try a couple more.</p>
<p>Sherrod Brown (D &#8211; Oh) would be the Homer Simpson Senator (D&#8217;oh). My Senator, Patty Murray (D- Wa) would be Dee WAAA or Dee Wah. Senator Tom Coburn (R &#8211; Ok) would be Rock. Larry Craig (R &#8211; ID) would of course be RID. John McCain (R &#8211; Az) would be RAZ.</p>
<p>And Hilary Rodham Clinton (D &#8211; NY) would be Dee-NY or just Deny. </p>
<p>Yeah, I&#8217;ve got a warped sense of humor, but I do enjoy it. What would your Senator be?</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Volpe</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/12/20/hillary-clintons-mixed-message/comment-page-1/#comment-308818</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Volpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/12/20/hillary-clintons-mixed-message/#comment-308818</guid>
		<description>Interesting. The sites aren&#039;t even up yet. The manner in which they received their info may very well be very interesting. Still, as long as you source them you are covered.

On another note, I have wondered from the beginning about this so called charm offensive. The thing about a charm offensive is you have to be charming. I just can&#039;t believe that Hillary thinks she can be charming. That laugh does her in to begin with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. The sites aren&#8217;t even up yet. The manner in which they received their info may very well be very interesting. Still, as long as you source them you are covered.</p>
<p>On another note, I have wondered from the beginning about this so called charm offensive. The thing about a charm offensive is you have to be charming. I just can&#8217;t believe that Hillary thinks she can be charming. That laugh does her in to begin with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DRJ</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/12/20/hillary-clintons-mixed-message/comment-page-1/#comment-308801</link>
		<dc:creator>DRJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/12/20/hillary-clintons-mixed-message/#comment-308801</guid>
		<description>Michael,

ABC described them as websites designed to attack Obama.  Since ABC probably knows more about political attack tactics than I do, I went with that characterization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>ABC described them as websites designed to attack Obama.  Since ABC probably knows more about political attack tactics than I do, I went with that characterization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Volpe</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/12/20/hillary-clintons-mixed-message/comment-page-1/#comment-308799</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Volpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/12/20/hillary-clintons-mixed-message/#comment-308799</guid>
		<description>A couple of things. The domain names don&#039;t necessarily represent an attack position. How do people know those were created to attack Obama?

Two, I think this is part and parcel of the M.O. of Hillary Clinton. She will do anything she has to to win. She will go on a charm offensive at the same time she attacks her opponent mercilessly. She won&#039;t even bat an eye.

Third, you all need to keep in mind that the socialist message that Hillary peddles may not have any sway against sophisticated folks, however the general voting public is not sophisticated. That is why that message is so dangerous. The average person is well, frankly, too stupid to realize that they are being sold a bill of goods, and they will think that Hillary is looking out for them because Hillary promises: free health care, education, retirement, etc. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://proprietornation.blogspot.com/2007/10/socialist-or-vote-buyer-does-it-really.html&quot; title=&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I wrote a piece about this tactic of hers a couple months back on my blog.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of things. The domain names don&#8217;t necessarily represent an attack position. How do people know those were created to attack Obama?</p>
<p>Two, I think this is part and parcel of the M.O. of Hillary Clinton. She will do anything she has to to win. She will go on a charm offensive at the same time she attacks her opponent mercilessly. She won&#8217;t even bat an eye.</p>
<p>Third, you all need to keep in mind that the socialist message that Hillary peddles may not have any sway against sophisticated folks, however the general voting public is not sophisticated. That is why that message is so dangerous. The average person is well, frankly, too stupid to realize that they are being sold a bill of goods, and they will think that Hillary is looking out for them because Hillary promises: free health care, education, retirement, etc. </p>
<p><a href="http://proprietornation.blogspot.com/2007/10/socialist-or-vote-buyer-does-it-really.html" title="" rel="nofollow">I wrote a piece about this tactic of hers a couple months back on my blog.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beldar</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/12/20/hillary-clintons-mixed-message/comment-page-1/#comment-308781</link>
		<dc:creator>Beldar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/12/20/hillary-clintons-mixed-message/#comment-308781</guid>
		<description>Concealed under those piles of boxes are the bodies of approximately 120 million mugged American taxpayers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concealed under those piles of boxes are the bodies of approximately 120 million mugged American taxpayers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
