<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fair and Balanced at CNN &#8212; Where Every Top Tier Democrat Candidate for President Gets To Plant A Question in the GOP Debate &#8212; (Edwards Got Two)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2007/11/29/fair-and-balanced-at-cnn-where-every-top-tier-democrat-candidate-for-president-gets-to-plant-a-question-in-the-gop-debate-edwards-got-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2007/11/29/fair-and-balanced-at-cnn-where-every-top-tier-democrat-candidate-for-president-gets-to-plant-a-question-in-the-gop-debate-edwards-got-two/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:10:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: daleyrocks</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/11/29/fair-and-balanced-at-cnn-where-every-top-tier-democrat-candidate-for-president-gets-to-plant-a-question-in-the-gop-debate-edwards-got-two/comment-page-3/#comment-303961</link>
		<dc:creator>daleyrocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 07:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/11/29/fair-and-balanced-at-cnn-where-every-top-tier-democrat-candidate-for-president-gets-to-plant-a-question-in-the-gop-debate-edwards-got-two/#comment-303961</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s ready to work the wrinkle room.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s ready to work the wrinkle room.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nk</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/11/29/fair-and-balanced-at-cnn-where-every-top-tier-democrat-candidate-for-president-gets-to-plant-a-question-in-the-gop-debate-edwards-got-two/comment-page-3/#comment-303952</link>
		<dc:creator>nk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 06:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/11/29/fair-and-balanced-at-cnn-where-every-top-tier-democrat-candidate-for-president-gets-to-plant-a-question-in-the-gop-debate-edwards-got-two/#comment-303952</guid>
		<description>I like him.  He&#039;s bright and educated.  A little bit extreme on gay issues and his site is NSFW.  He would have been good subtly insulting King Edward VII alongside GBS and Oscar Wilde while seeming to fawn up to him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like him.  He&#8217;s bright and educated.  A little bit extreme on gay issues and his site is NSFW.  He would have been good subtly insulting King Edward VII alongside GBS and Oscar Wilde while seeming to fawn up to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/11/29/fair-and-balanced-at-cnn-where-every-top-tier-democrat-candidate-for-president-gets-to-plant-a-question-in-the-gop-debate-edwards-got-two/comment-page-3/#comment-303946</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 05:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/11/29/fair-and-balanced-at-cnn-where-every-top-tier-democrat-candidate-for-president-gets-to-plant-a-question-in-the-gop-debate-edwards-got-two/#comment-303946</guid>
		<description>Yeah, some of his stuff is for show, I think.  Not that it&#039;s not sincere, but I think he finds different ways to express himself depending upon the venue and his mood.  Like the rest of us -- but waaay more extreme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, some of his stuff is for show, I think.  Not that it&#8217;s not sincere, but I think he finds different ways to express himself depending upon the venue and his mood.  Like the rest of us &#8212; but waaay more extreme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradley J. Fikes</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/11/29/fair-and-balanced-at-cnn-where-every-top-tier-democrat-candidate-for-president-gets-to-plant-a-question-in-the-gop-debate-edwards-got-two/comment-page-3/#comment-303926</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradley J. Fikes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 04:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/11/29/fair-and-balanced-at-cnn-where-every-top-tier-democrat-candidate-for-president-gets-to-plant-a-question-in-the-gop-debate-edwards-got-two/#comment-303926</guid>
		<description>David E.

Tsk, tsk. You know the people here aren&#039;t neo-fascists.

To others: Pssssst: David E.&#039;s really a puddytat in person, but he feels the need to roar in cyberspace.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.haloscan.com/comments/cathyfans/239#47736&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&#039;s David E. from our humble Swamp:&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;i&gt;As you know I&#039;ve met Patterico and quite like him personally. We &quot;bonded&quot; over the Phil Spector case, as we both agreed on how it should be prosecuted. Naturally there&#039;s little else we agree so easily on. His campaign against the LAT is interesting in that his points are often quite well-taken, sometimes marginal and sometimes just freelance complaining.&lt;/i&gt;

Sorry, David E., that I outed you as a reasonable observer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David E.</p>
<p>Tsk, tsk. You know the people here aren&#8217;t neo-fascists.</p>
<p>To others: Pssssst: David E.&#8217;s really a puddytat in person, but he feels the need to roar in cyberspace.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.haloscan.com/comments/cathyfans/239#47736" rel="nofollow">Here&#8217;s David E. from our humble Swamp:</a></p>
<p><i>As you know I&#8217;ve met Patterico and quite like him personally. We &#8220;bonded&#8221; over the Phil Spector case, as we both agreed on how it should be prosecuted. Naturally there&#8217;s little else we agree so easily on. His campaign against the LAT is interesting in that his points are often quite well-taken, sometimes marginal and sometimes just freelance complaining.</i></p>
<p>Sorry, David E., that I outed you as a reasonable observer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Passing Through</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/11/29/fair-and-balanced-at-cnn-where-every-top-tier-democrat-candidate-for-president-gets-to-plant-a-question-in-the-gop-debate-edwards-got-two/comment-page-3/#comment-303914</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Passing Through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 03:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/11/29/fair-and-balanced-at-cnn-where-every-top-tier-democrat-candidate-for-president-gets-to-plant-a-question-in-the-gop-debate-edwards-got-two/#comment-303914</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Wow, that was breathtaking!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

We aim to please.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Now read my Latest FaBlog: Kerr-Fuffle. Then visit the rest of my website to find out why your hysterical neo-fascit fantasies bear no relation to actual reality.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Nope. Like I said, I&#039;ve read enough from you on this site to form my opinion of your quality. Why would I want to follow links to the sort of information that promotes it or go to your website and wade through more of it? I haven&#039;t followed a one of your links or visited your website up until now and have no intention of breaking a perfect record. 

As a matter of fact, I find it odd that you and others like you  who go through the effort of visiting other sites to promote your nonsense would assume anyone would want to trace the history of whatever your issues are.

Like I said, I&#039;ve figured you out and decided you&#039;ve nothing to offer. Some time ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Wow, that was breathtaking!</p></blockquote>
<p>We aim to please.</p>
<blockquote><p>Now read my Latest FaBlog: Kerr-Fuffle. Then visit the rest of my website to find out why your hysterical neo-fascit fantasies bear no relation to actual reality.</p></blockquote>
<p>Nope. Like I said, I&#8217;ve read enough from you on this site to form my opinion of your quality. Why would I want to follow links to the sort of information that promotes it or go to your website and wade through more of it? I haven&#8217;t followed a one of your links or visited your website up until now and have no intention of breaking a perfect record. </p>
<p>As a matter of fact, I find it odd that you and others like you  who go through the effort of visiting other sites to promote your nonsense would assume anyone would want to trace the history of whatever your issues are.</p>
<p>Like I said, I&#8217;ve figured you out and decided you&#8217;ve nothing to offer. Some time ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daleyrocks</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/11/29/fair-and-balanced-at-cnn-where-every-top-tier-democrat-candidate-for-president-gets-to-plant-a-question-in-the-gop-debate-edwards-got-two/comment-page-3/#comment-303902</link>
		<dc:creator>daleyrocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 02:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/11/29/fair-and-balanced-at-cnn-where-every-top-tier-democrat-candidate-for-president-gets-to-plant-a-question-in-the-gop-debate-edwards-got-two/#comment-303902</guid>
		<description>David E. - You must be pretty desperate for traffic on your blog to beg for traffic on it by commenting over here.

Are you still relevant?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David E. &#8211; You must be pretty desperate for traffic on your blog to beg for traffic on it by commenting over here.</p>
<p>Are you still relevant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SPQR</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/11/29/fair-and-balanced-at-cnn-where-every-top-tier-democrat-candidate-for-president-gets-to-plant-a-question-in-the-gop-debate-edwards-got-two/comment-page-3/#comment-303900</link>
		<dc:creator>SPQR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 01:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/11/29/fair-and-balanced-at-cnn-where-every-top-tier-democrat-candidate-for-president-gets-to-plant-a-question-in-the-gop-debate-edwards-got-two/#comment-303900</guid>
		<description>Uh, &quot;hysterical neo-fascist&quot; pretty much confirms JPT&#039;s analysis regardless of what you&#039;ve posted elsewhere, David.  Frankly, the schtick got old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, &#8220;hysterical neo-fascist&#8221; pretty much confirms JPT&#8217;s analysis regardless of what you&#8217;ve posted elsewhere, David.  Frankly, the schtick got old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ehrenstein</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/11/29/fair-and-balanced-at-cnn-where-every-top-tier-democrat-candidate-for-president-gets-to-plant-a-question-in-the-gop-debate-edwards-got-two/comment-page-3/#comment-303897</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ehrenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 01:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/11/29/fair-and-balanced-at-cnn-where-every-top-tier-democrat-candidate-for-president-gets-to-plant-a-question-in-the-gop-debate-edwards-got-two/#comment-303897</guid>
		<description>Wow, that was breathtaking!

Now read my &lt;a href=&quot;http://fablog.ehrensteinland.com/&quot; title=&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Latest FaBlog: Kerr-Fuffle.&lt;/a&gt; Then visit the rest of my website to find out why your hysterical neo-fascit fantasies bear no relation to actual reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that was breathtaking!</p>
<p>Now read my <a href="http://fablog.ehrensteinland.com/" title="" rel="nofollow">Latest FaBlog: Kerr-Fuffle.</a> Then visit the rest of my website to find out why your hysterical neo-fascit fantasies bear no relation to actual reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Passing Through</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/11/29/fair-and-balanced-at-cnn-where-every-top-tier-democrat-candidate-for-president-gets-to-plant-a-question-in-the-gop-debate-edwards-got-two/comment-page-3/#comment-303888</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Passing Through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/11/29/fair-and-balanced-at-cnn-where-every-top-tier-democrat-candidate-for-president-gets-to-plant-a-question-in-the-gop-debate-edwards-got-two/#comment-303888</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;OK, Ace. Who am I? What do you actually know about me?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;ll take a stab at it. I&#039;m not Ace, nor do I comment often, but read the site quite often and figured you out some time ago.

You&#039;re a self-loathing gay who sees every social or political issue/process through the prism of sexual identity. You&#039;ve decided contrary to available evidence that the Democratic party is the champion of gays, and, more in line with available evidence, it is the party that is more likely to also apply the prism of sexual identity to social or political issues/processes, which is fine by you as long as the application of sexual identity politics is limited to democratic gays, not republican or conservative gays.

In order to conflate the three contradictory positions, you partition people into two groups, democrats and evil conservatives, and make shit up to support the partitioning. It doesn&#039;t work. It makes you appear stupid. It underlines your self-loathing bigotry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>OK, Ace. Who am I? What do you actually know about me?</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ll take a stab at it. I&#8217;m not Ace, nor do I comment often, but read the site quite often and figured you out some time ago.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re a self-loathing gay who sees every social or political issue/process through the prism of sexual identity. You&#8217;ve decided contrary to available evidence that the Democratic party is the champion of gays, and, more in line with available evidence, it is the party that is more likely to also apply the prism of sexual identity to social or political issues/processes, which is fine by you as long as the application of sexual identity politics is limited to democratic gays, not republican or conservative gays.</p>
<p>In order to conflate the three contradictory positions, you partition people into two groups, democrats and evil conservatives, and make shit up to support the partitioning. It doesn&#8217;t work. It makes you appear stupid. It underlines your self-loathing bigotry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WLS</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/11/29/fair-and-balanced-at-cnn-where-every-top-tier-democrat-candidate-for-president-gets-to-plant-a-question-in-the-gop-debate-edwards-got-two/comment-page-3/#comment-303884</link>
		<dc:creator>WLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/11/29/fair-and-balanced-at-cnn-where-every-top-tier-democrat-candidate-for-president-gets-to-plant-a-question-in-the-gop-debate-edwards-got-two/#comment-303884</guid>
		<description>Because you&#039;re now talking to yourself.  

No one else is interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because you&#8217;re now talking to yourself.  </p>
<p>No one else is interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
