Comments on: Possible Terrorist Probes on US Airplanes http://patterico.com/2007/11/19/possible-terrorist-probes-on-us-airplanes/ Harangues that just make sense Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:24:23 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: daleyrocks http://patterico.com/2007/11/19/possible-terrorist-probes-on-us-airplanes/#comment-302014 daleyrocks Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:44:58 +0000 http://patterico.com/2007/11/19/possible-terrorist-probes-on-us-airplanes/#comment-302014 Where's phil? Normally he's out in front with loony comments on airline terror threads. Where’s phil? Normally he’s out in front with loony comments on airline terror threads.

]]> By: Dodd http://patterico.com/2007/11/19/possible-terrorist-probes-on-us-airplanes/#comment-302003 Dodd Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:12:22 +0000 http://patterico.com/2007/11/19/possible-terrorist-probes-on-us-airplanes/#comment-302003 <i>one wonders when TSA Suspicious Incident Reports #1-#176 occurred </i> I'd just as soon they not become public. Because any of these that actually is a probe or dry run that becomes public exposes a method we're now alert to that those looking for them will be aware has been burned. one wonders when TSA Suspicious Incident Reports #1-#176 occurred

I’d just as soon they not become public. Because any of these that actually is a probe or dry run that becomes public exposes a method we’re now alert to that those looking for them will be aware has been burned.

]]> By: Techie http://patterico.com/2007/11/19/possible-terrorist-probes-on-us-airplanes/#comment-301954 Techie Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:17:22 +0000 http://patterico.com/2007/11/19/possible-terrorist-probes-on-us-airplanes/#comment-301954 I'd always suspected Al Queda-types of having a wide stance.... I’d always suspected Al Queda-types of having a wide stance….

]]> By: Scott Jacobs http://patterico.com/2007/11/19/possible-terrorist-probes-on-us-airplanes/#comment-301932 Scott Jacobs Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:15:00 +0000 http://patterico.com/2007/11/19/possible-terrorist-probes-on-us-airplanes/#comment-301932 <blockquote>Lets hope he gets the other 176. Becasue this one doesn’t mention whether any of them were republican senators.</blockquote> You're confusing security and airplanes with the bathrooms...

Lets hope he gets the other 176. Becasue this one doesn’t mention whether any of them were republican senators.

You’re confusing security and airplanes with the bathrooms…

]]> By: whitd http://patterico.com/2007/11/19/possible-terrorist-probes-on-us-airplanes/#comment-301925 whitd Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:43:36 +0000 http://patterico.com/2007/11/19/possible-terrorist-probes-on-us-airplanes/#comment-301925 "It was leaked to me earlier today in my ongoing efforts to compile terrorist dry runs and probes on airplanes" Lets hope he gets the other 176. Becasue this one doesn't mention whether any of them were republican senators. “It was leaked to me earlier today in my ongoing efforts to compile terrorist dry runs and probes on airplanes”

Lets hope he gets the other 176. Becasue this one doesn’t mention whether any of them were republican senators.

]]> By: voiceofreason http://patterico.com/2007/11/19/possible-terrorist-probes-on-us-airplanes/#comment-301839 voiceofreason Tue, 20 Nov 2007 05:23:26 +0000 http://patterico.com/2007/11/19/possible-terrorist-probes-on-us-airplanes/#comment-301839 So it was publish? While your idea sounds like a good one there is probably more of a risk of releasing fixed weaknesses because it might give them ideas about new ones to exploit. So it was publish? While your idea sounds like a good one there is probably more of a risk of releasing fixed weaknesses because it might give them ideas about new ones to exploit.

]]> By: Scott Jacobs http://patterico.com/2007/11/19/possible-terrorist-probes-on-us-airplanes/#comment-301838 Scott Jacobs Tue, 20 Nov 2007 05:20:35 +0000 http://patterico.com/2007/11/19/possible-terrorist-probes-on-us-airplanes/#comment-301838 ah. my mistake ah. my mistake

]]> By: voiceofreason http://patterico.com/2007/11/19/possible-terrorist-probes-on-us-airplanes/#comment-301827 voiceofreason Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:52:50 +0000 http://patterico.com/2007/11/19/possible-terrorist-probes-on-us-airplanes/#comment-301827 Scott, Did you mean write publish or punish? Scott,
Did you mean write publish or punish?

]]> By: Scott Jacobs http://patterico.com/2007/11/19/possible-terrorist-probes-on-us-airplanes/#comment-301823 Scott Jacobs Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:43:36 +0000 http://patterico.com/2007/11/19/possible-terrorist-probes-on-us-airplanes/#comment-301823 Oh, I'd love to know why they shouldn't punish them... <blockquote>And this was no “probe”. They were just feeling things out. A probe is far more serious. This was certainly not a dry run. Quit being so scared.</blockquote> You really have no idea what you're talking about, do you... Oh, I’d love to know why they shouldn’t punish them…

And this was no “probe”. They were just feeling things out. A probe is far more serious. This was certainly not a dry run. Quit being so scared.

You really have no idea what you’re talking about, do you…

]]> By: voiceofreason http://patterico.com/2007/11/19/possible-terrorist-probes-on-us-airplanes/#comment-301820 voiceofreason Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:36:45 +0000 http://patterico.com/2007/11/19/possible-terrorist-probes-on-us-airplanes/#comment-301820 They won't publish them and shouldn't. They won’t publish them and shouldn’t.

]]>