Blogger Ace of Spades is coming to the West Coast.
I, for one, plan to meet him.
How about you?
The event takes place this Saturday, in Santa Monica. I don’t know if I can say more than that, but if you’re interested in coming, you should go to this post and e-mail the fellow whose e-mail address is published there.
Baldilocks will be there, along with some of the morons who comment at Ace’s site. Now who can argue with that?
Pronounced "Patter-EE-koh"
E-mail: Just use my moniker Patterico, followed by the @ symbol, followed by gmail.com
Disclaimer: Simpsons avatar may resemble a younger Patterico...
The statements made on this web site reflect the personal opinions of the author. They are not made in any official capacity, and do not represent the opinions of the author's employer.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | ||
Powered by WordPress.
Captain Ed and now Ace. If you ask me, you’re leading a pretty cool blogging life.
DRJ (5c60fb) — 11/1/2007 @ 9:14 pmIf you ask me, you’re leading a pretty cool blogging life.
A “cool blogging life” is the classic oxymoron. That said, I agree with you.
Patterico (bad89b) — 11/1/2007 @ 9:16 pmSo you’re saying I’m classic?
DRJ (5c60fb) — 11/1/2007 @ 9:18 pmI thought “classic” was a synonym for “damn old” …
at least it is whenever I hear it. “Hey, SPQR, you are a classic.”
😉
SPQR (6c18fd) — 11/1/2007 @ 9:23 pmHave fun!
Paul (66339f) — 11/2/2007 @ 1:25 amBecause of your profession, I’d suggest you pack it in before the vagrant-throttling part of the evening begins.
spongeworthy (45b30e) — 11/2/2007 @ 5:38 amI’ll be there. Looking forward to meet you, Pat.
H2U (81b7bd) — 11/2/2007 @ 10:01 amWhile you guys are partying, I’ll be doing the dirty work of the resistance in Seattle. Everyweek or so, I buy a dozen copies of Hustler, and then open a Seattle Post-ntelligencer paperbox and insert them into selected papers. Putting my money where my mouth is boys. Those cratering circulation numbers you’ll see next week… that’s partly my work.
sherlock (b4bbcc) — 11/2/2007 @ 11:35 amSherlock,
Are you sure that doesn’t increase circulation?
DRJ (5c60fb) — 11/2/2007 @ 11:46 amDepends on what kind of circulation you are referring to. Whether the response be titillation or disgust, there would be a concomittant increase of bloodflow to various corporal loci dependent upon whether the response was based upon moral turpitude versus moral indignation. Sometimes called the whoa-woe response dichotomy among phlebotomists.
allan (4a0aff) — 11/2/2007 @ 4:28 pm