Now *That’s* a Teaser!
Jan Crawford Greenburg says that her upcoming interview with Clarence Thomas “is something you will not, under any circumstances, want to miss.”
I believe her. More when it becomes available.
Jan Crawford Greenburg says that her upcoming interview with Clarence Thomas “is something you will not, under any circumstances, want to miss.”
I believe her. More when it becomes available.
Pronounced "Patter-EE-koh"
E-mail: Just use my moniker Patterico, followed by the @ symbol, followed by gmail.com
Disclaimer: Simpsons avatar may resemble a younger Patterico...
The statements made on this web site reflect the personal opinions of the author. They are not made in any official capacity, and do not represent the opinions of the author's employer.
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |||||
3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
Powered by WordPress.
Bob says: “This is advertising; not news.”
And darn good advertising it is. Looking forward to it.
Posted by: Patterico | Sep 28, 2007 3:34:01 PM
Why do you believe this will be anything but
Semanticleo (4741c2) — 9/28/2007 @ 1:59 pma puff piece? If Crawford had ‘speaking truth to power’ bona fides, would Thomas agree to the interview? Just (cynically) asking………
And remember all the liberal hate speech being aimed at him becuase of his oppisition to AFERMATIVE ACTION and the lies from ANITA HILL i mean CLARENCE THOMAS did,nt get a fair shake from those liberals
krazy kagu (5b69ac) — 9/28/2007 @ 2:04 pmI believe.
DRJ (8b9d41) — 9/28/2007 @ 2:33 pmI’m going to listen to the one with Rush Limbaugh, 90 minutes, half of Rush’s show, just to annoy Semanticleo.
nk (7d4710) — 9/28/2007 @ 2:41 pmAs someone once said, if I couldn’t have my own brain, I’d like to have JCG’s.
driver (faae10) — 9/28/2007 @ 3:41 pmGreat, here we have one of the most talented and skilled legal reporters in the country to come along in quite a while and the usual out-to-lunch crowd just smears her.
Great.
Simply because Thomas – while on tour promoting a book – granted her an interview.
But smear her anyway.
Classy.
SMG
SteveMG (544727) — 9/28/2007 @ 3:49 pmHoly censors, dude. Haven’t you seen “L.A. Story”?
It’s humor.
Christoph (92b8f7) — 9/28/2007 @ 3:56 pmHoly censors, dude. Haven’t you seen “L.A. Story”
My post wasn’t directed at the movie line.
It was directed one of the usual suspects who questioned Greenberg’s professionalism.
Without even seeing her story.
And since I don’t run this blog, I can’t “censor” anyone.
SMG
SteveMG (544727) — 9/28/2007 @ 4:26 pmI think he’s talking about me. I deleted one of his posts. I got the reference, but just thought it was inappropriate.
Patterico (2a8eaa) — 9/28/2007 @ 4:47 pmIt was TOTALLY inappropriate.
Gee. It was humor. And Leslie Nielsen. How much more inappropriate do you want, Chris Rock?
Christoph (92b8f7) — 9/28/2007 @ 4:50 pmGreat.
blah (55d03b) — 9/28/2007 @ 7:16 pmIll being the coke.
Bottles or cans?
Don’t teaser me, bro!
Daryl Herbert (4ecd4c) — 9/28/2007 @ 10:16 pm