<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dog Bites Tribune Stock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2007/08/14/dog-bites-tribune-stock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2007/08/14/dog-bites-tribune-stock/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:06:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/08/14/dog-bites-tribune-stock/comment-page-1/#comment-277695</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/08/14/dog-bites-tribune-stock/#comment-277695</guid>
		<description>Why do I care about Tribune stock, again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do I care about Tribune stock, again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ras</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/08/14/dog-bites-tribune-stock/comment-page-1/#comment-277688</link>
		<dc:creator>ras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/08/14/dog-bites-tribune-stock/#comment-277688</guid>
		<description>ada,

My, we are panicky today, aren&#039;t we? Do you base that in nature or nurture?

The fed will indeed accept somewhat higher inflation. So they&#039;ll fudge the stats - a proven tactic, since history proves that changing the definition of inflation does NOT stop economists from treating it as a constant measure (&quot;if we call an economist a dog, then how many dogs does an economist have?) - by starting to move housing back into the CPI.

Since housing will at best be flat in real terms, at 7% inflation fudged down to 3% or 4% by the changes, the value of money and therefore of real debt will be halved in a mere 10 years, or approx two presidential terms. Full bonus: the govt&#039;ll cut its own debt in half too, and can resume bribing you w/your own money.

Sure, foreign holders of US bonds will be ticked, but so what, they don&#039;t vote, and besides, the govt can then reward friends and punish enemies on a case by case basis.

Serious Supplementary Credit Question To Weed Out The Posers: if you were the world&#039;s biggest altruist... OR ... the world&#039;s biggest bastard ...  ... what would you do  different? ... anything? Or is it the same strategy either way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ada,</p>
<p>My, we are panicky today, aren&#8217;t we? Do you base that in nature or nurture?</p>
<p>The fed will indeed accept somewhat higher inflation. So they&#8217;ll fudge the stats &#8211; a proven tactic, since history proves that changing the definition of inflation does NOT stop economists from treating it as a constant measure (&#8221;if we call an economist a dog, then how many dogs does an economist have?) &#8211; by starting to move housing back into the CPI.</p>
<p>Since housing will at best be flat in real terms, at 7% inflation fudged down to 3% or 4% by the changes, the value of money and therefore of real debt will be halved in a mere 10 years, or approx two presidential terms. Full bonus: the govt&#8217;ll cut its own debt in half too, and can resume bribing you w/your own money.</p>
<p>Sure, foreign holders of US bonds will be ticked, but so what, they don&#8217;t vote, and besides, the govt can then reward friends and punish enemies on a case by case basis.</p>
<p>Serious Supplementary Credit Question To Weed Out The Posers: if you were the world&#8217;s biggest altruist&#8230; OR &#8230; the world&#8217;s biggest bastard &#8230;  &#8230; what would you do  different? &#8230; anything? Or is it the same strategy either way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: assistant devil's advocate</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/08/14/dog-bites-tribune-stock/comment-page-1/#comment-277673</link>
		<dc:creator>assistant devil's advocate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 06:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/08/14/dog-bites-tribune-stock/#comment-277673</guid>
		<description>the whole damn market is tanking due to the subprime mortgage thing.  all that money the fed pumped in to ease liquidity fears is gonna ignite major inflation.  i&#039;m ready for it, are you?  if there&#039;s gonna be an economic apocalypse, let&#039;s get it over with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the whole damn market is tanking due to the subprime mortgage thing.  all that money the fed pumped in to ease liquidity fears is gonna ignite major inflation.  i&#8217;m ready for it, are you?  if there&#8217;s gonna be an economic apocalypse, let&#8217;s get it over with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
