6/29/2007

3 Comments

1. No it’s Roberts vs Scalia.
   And I have more respect for Scalia

   Comment by AF (4a3fa6) — 6/29/2007 @ 6:30 pm

2. The clear implication was that the chief justice lacked the courage or honesty to overturn the precedent openly as Justice Scalia himself would have done.

   In other words, there’s a guy who thinks he ought to be Chief Justice.

   Comment by Pablo (99243e) — 6/29/2007 @ 6:40 pm

3. It may be tangential to the theme of your post, but I also like this article by Mona Charen.

   Comment by DRJ (31d948) — 6/30/2007 @ 4:27 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.