The Incrementalism of the Roberts Court
It’s Greenburg vs. Greenhouse.
Pronounced "Patter-EE-koh"
E-mail: Just use my moniker Patterico, followed by the @ symbol, followed by gmail.com
Disclaimer: Simpsons avatar may resemble a younger Patterico...
The statements made on this web site reflect the personal opinions of the author. They are not made in any official capacity, and do not represent the opinions of the author's employer.
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
Powered by WordPress.
No it’s Roberts vs Scalia.
AF (4a3fa6) — 6/29/2007 @ 6:30 pmAnd I have more respect for Scalia
In other words, there’s a guy who thinks he ought to be Chief Justice.
Pablo (99243e) — 6/29/2007 @ 6:40 pmIt may be tangential to the theme of your post, but I also like this article by Mona Charen.
DRJ (31d948) — 6/30/2007 @ 4:27 am