Are you CERTAIN this was an error?
[posted by Justin Levine]Â
Today’s Miami Herald has this curious notice to its readers:
A photograph of Bill Clinton and Officer Alan Davis on Page 3B in Monday’s local section did not intend to imply that the former president had involvement in a sexual solicitation case against the officer. Davis and Clinton were photographed together when the officer did bomb checks during a visit by Clinton. Davis was arrested Sunday and charged with solicitation and transportation with the purpose of prostitution.
[Hat-tip: Lucianne.com]
Whether it was an error or not, who knows? But it did give me a chuckle… something about, I don’t know, irony.
Dana (b4a26c) — 6/12/2007 @ 12:58 pmHaha… Clinton, always bringin’ the classy.
David N. Scott (71e316) — 6/12/2007 @ 3:11 pmOddly enough, this is the second time today that Clinton has been mentioned is association with a prostitution arrest.
I heard on the radio that a woman aressted for running a ring of ladies with negotiable virtue had bragged to an undercover police officer in Las Vegas — prior to her arrest — that her girls were sooooo discreet, that Bill Clinton had been a client.
I’m not sure how much credibility a madam marketing her crew should be given, but I sure wish I could find a link to that story.
stoo (de36cc) — 6/12/2007 @ 8:16 pm