But at this point, the—the credibility of some of these people involved in this is so low that I wouldn’t—you know, I really wouldn’t wanna put my credibility on the line and tell you that it—that didn’t happen.

equals this;

former U.S. Atty. H.E. “Bud” Cummins III wonders whether it had something to do with the probe he opened into alleged corruption by Republican officials in Missouri amid a Senate race there that was promising to be a nail-biter.

Generalization as opposed to a pointed accusation.

And, in alphie/neville world this;

I can assure you there are dozens of reporters around the country who have heard me tell my version of this the exact same way. Mr. Serrano is the only one who heard it differently.

He’s just hoping that nobody notices. But some of us did notice when his BDS obsession got him banned at another site for this little gem, contributed on a thread dealing with the shootings at VT;

Myself, I would have pointed out this shooting is just a typical hour’s civilian toll over in Iraq.

Posted by alphie | permalink
on 04/16 at 02:41 PM

Sweet guy, no?

I too am astounded at the amazing dishonesty of leftist institutions like the L.A. Times (worst of the worst?) that think honesty doesn’t matter a damn as long as you are struggling to bring down a duly elected Republican administration.

I find leftists of that stripe frightening. It is hard to think of them in terms of other than the “enemy”.

What I mean is not that we should raise up arms; that’s daft. The pen being mightier, etc. Yet… these people are conscienceless and we try to fight them with conscience. Sometimes we win and sometimes we lose, but their conscience never raises itself.

What a disaster the editors of the L.A. Times are. They should not only be ashamed, they should positively be embarrassed — if they had a conscience.

HINOJOSA: So when you hear that Democrats and—and even Republican Arlen Specter, are trying to investigate whether or not the—the firings were motivated by a desire to squelch corruptions in—corruption investigations that may have involved Republicans, you say what?

CUMMINS: There was a time when I would say that that was a little bit too conspiratorial or a little too paranoid, and—and that it probably doesn’t reach so far to retaliate against somebody that conducted a corruption investigation, or to stop someone from conducting another one, or to punish somebody for not investigating a voter fraud case or a Democrat public corruption case. But at this point, the—the credibility of some of these people involved in this is so low that I wouldn’t—you know, I really wouldn’t wanna put my credibility on the line and tell you that it—that didn’t happen.

http://www.pbs.org/now/news/311-transcript.html

And as poorly redacted things go, leaving “****” in there gives us a strong clue to your last name. Or is that no longer a secret?