Comments on: Geoffrey Stone’s Silly Post Mentioned in Another “Post” http://patterico.com/2007/04/30/geoffrey-stones-silly-post-mentioned-in-another-post/ Harangues that just make sense Thu, 23 May 2013 15:04:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: Alta Bob http://patterico.com/2007/04/30/geoffrey-stones-silly-post-mentioned-in-another-post/comment-page-1/#comment-262088 Alta Bob Tue, 01 May 2007 03:31:41 +0000 http://patterico.com/2007/04/30/geoffrey-stones-silly-post-mentioned-in-another-post/#comment-262088 Has any one broken down the religious bent on the Congress that voted in the law in the first place. Why so much focus on the court? Has any one broken down the religious bent on the Congress that voted in the law in the first place. Why so much focus on the court?

]]> By: Ray G http://patterico.com/2007/04/30/geoffrey-stones-silly-post-mentioned-in-another-post/comment-page-1/#comment-262059 Ray G Tue, 01 May 2007 02:06:03 +0000 http://patterico.com/2007/04/30/geoffrey-stones-silly-post-mentioned-in-another-post/#comment-262059 Or, in other words, the media via Stone's post, are regliously profiling. Or, in other words, the media via Stone’s post, are regliously profiling.

]]> By: Ray G http://patterico.com/2007/04/30/geoffrey-stones-silly-post-mentioned-in-another-post/comment-page-1/#comment-262057 Ray G Tue, 01 May 2007 02:05:01 +0000 http://patterico.com/2007/04/30/geoffrey-stones-silly-post-mentioned-in-another-post/#comment-262057 Now imagine that five people of African and Hispanic heritage came to an agreement, and the four desenters were all white. (It wouldn't have to be a court, it could be American Idol or some such foolishness.) Hmm, . . . . the only way anyone would get away with pointing out the differing opinions by race, would be to frame the white people as being wrong. But there is just no way that anyone in the mainstream would dare say, "They all voted that way just because of their skin color." Even if everyone thought it. Now imagine that five people of African and Hispanic heritage came to an agreement, and the four desenters were all white. (It wouldn’t have to be a court, it could be American Idol or some such foolishness.)

Hmm, . . . . the only way anyone would get away with pointing out the differing opinions by race, would be to frame the white people as being wrong.

But there is just no way that anyone in the mainstream would dare say, “They all voted that way just because of their skin color.” Even if everyone thought it.

]]> By: Another Drew http://patterico.com/2007/04/30/geoffrey-stones-silly-post-mentioned-in-another-post/comment-page-1/#comment-262041 Another Drew Tue, 01 May 2007 00:07:55 +0000 http://patterico.com/2007/04/30/geoffrey-stones-silly-post-mentioned-in-another-post/#comment-262041 Not only damning, but accurate too. Not only damning, but accurate too.

]]> By: DRJ http://patterico.com/2007/04/30/geoffrey-stones-silly-post-mentioned-in-another-post/comment-page-1/#comment-262032 DRJ Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:20:28 +0000 http://patterico.com/2007/04/30/geoffrey-stones-silly-post-mentioned-in-another-post/#comment-262032 From John Yoo in the Wall Street Journal link:<blockquote>"And I fully agree with my liberal colleagues who like to make sport of Justice Kennedy's opinions: He often seems more interested in his power on the court as the crucial fifth vote than in consistently advancing a coherent view of constitutional law."</blockquote>I can't imagine a more damning criticism than this. From John Yoo in the Wall Street Journal link:
“And I fully agree with my liberal colleagues who like to make sport of Justice Kennedy’s opinions: He often seems more interested in his power on the court as the crucial fifth vote than in consistently advancing a coherent view of constitutional law.”

I can’t imagine a more damning criticism than this.

]]> By: See Dubya http://patterico.com/2007/04/30/geoffrey-stones-silly-post-mentioned-in-another-post/comment-page-1/#comment-262031 See Dubya Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:10:58 +0000 http://patterico.com/2007/04/30/geoffrey-stones-silly-post-mentioned-in-another-post/#comment-262031 It's like Hooting and the Blogfish! [runs away fast...] It’s like Hooting and the Blogfish!

[runs away fast...]

]]> By: Patterico http://patterico.com/2007/04/30/geoffrey-stones-silly-post-mentioned-in-another-post/comment-page-1/#comment-261989 Patterico Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:22:06 +0000 http://patterico.com/2007/04/30/geoffrey-stones-silly-post-mentioned-in-another-post/#comment-261989 Didn't think so. Sometimes it's better to read first and taunt later. Didn’t think so.

Sometimes it’s better to read first and taunt later.

]]> By: Grotius http://patterico.com/2007/04/30/geoffrey-stones-silly-post-mentioned-in-another-post/comment-page-1/#comment-261987 Grotius Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:13:38 +0000 http://patterico.com/2007/04/30/geoffrey-stones-silly-post-mentioned-in-another-post/#comment-261987 Patterico, No. Patterico,

No.

]]> By: Patterico http://patterico.com/2007/04/30/geoffrey-stones-silly-post-mentioned-in-another-post/comment-page-1/#comment-261985 Patterico Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:05:26 +0000 http://patterico.com/2007/04/30/geoffrey-stones-silly-post-mentioned-in-another-post/#comment-261985 Got anything new to say about whether I got anything new to say about the Kathryn Johnston case? Got anything new to say about whether I got anything new to say about the Kathryn Johnston case?

]]> By: Patterico http://patterico.com/2007/04/30/geoffrey-stones-silly-post-mentioned-in-another-post/comment-page-1/#comment-261980 Patterico Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:44:50 +0000 http://patterico.com/2007/04/30/geoffrey-stones-silly-post-mentioned-in-another-post/#comment-261980 I sincerely doubt there is any news that should cause me to have anything new to say about the case. I sincerely doubt there is any news that should cause me to have anything new to say about the case.

]]>