<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court Upholds Federal Ban on Partial-Birth Abortion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2007/04/18/supreme-court-upholds-federal-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2007/04/18/supreme-court-upholds-federal-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: krazy kagu</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/04/18/supreme-court-upholds-federal-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/#comment-260408</link>
		<dc:creator>krazy kagu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/04/18/supreme-court-upholds-federal-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/#comment-260408</guid>
		<description>A real good decision by the court one which will have the over populationists wackoss real upset SCREW PAUL EHRLICH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A real good decision by the court one which will have the over populationists wackoss real upset SCREW PAUL EHRLICH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ehrenstein</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/04/18/supreme-court-upholds-federal-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/#comment-260396</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ehrenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/04/18/supreme-court-upholds-federal-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/#comment-260396</guid>
		<description>I get out plenty, nk. &lt;a href="http://ehrensteinland.com/htmls/g002/butler_reed.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Here's my lover Bill with the beautiful adopted child of a very close friend of ours&lt;/a&gt;. Her existence is beside the point of safe legal abortion -- and you know it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get out plenty, nk. <a href="http://ehrensteinland.com/htmls/g002/butler_reed.html" rel="nofollow">Here&#8217;s my lover Bill with the beautiful adopted child of a very close friend of ours</a>. Her existence is beside the point of safe legal abortion &#8212; and you know it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Murphy</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/04/18/supreme-court-upholds-federal-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/#comment-260381</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/04/18/supreme-court-upholds-federal-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/#comment-260381</guid>
		<description>BTW, there was zero chance that Kennedy would vote to uphold, as he had strenuously objected in Stenberg.  The only real surprise here was that he didn't find a way to overrule that as well.  Kennedy is on record as being willing to allow substantial state restrictions, and now that O'Connor is gone....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, there was zero chance that Kennedy would vote to uphold, as he had strenuously objected in Stenberg.  The only real surprise here was that he didn&#8217;t find a way to overrule that as well.  Kennedy is on record as being willing to allow substantial state restrictions, and now that O&#8217;Connor is gone&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nk</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/04/18/supreme-court-upholds-federal-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/#comment-260357</link>
		<dc:creator>nk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 02:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/04/18/supreme-court-upholds-federal-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/#comment-260357</guid>
		<description>David E. #2,

You have to get out more.  Perhaps to see some very beautiful children being raised by adoptive parents?  Whose biological parents chose not to abort them but give them up for adoption?

Topically: The Virginia Tech weirdo killed 32 people.  Compared to abortionists who stick forceps into the skulls of thousands of babies trying to get their first breath, he was a saint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David E. #2,</p>
<p>You have to get out more.  Perhaps to see some very beautiful children being raised by adoptive parents?  Whose biological parents chose not to abort them but give them up for adoption?</p>
<p>Topically: The Virginia Tech weirdo killed 32 people.  Compared to abortionists who stick forceps into the skulls of thousands of babies trying to get their first breath, he was a saint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Murphy</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/04/18/supreme-court-upholds-federal-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/#comment-260322</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/04/18/supreme-court-upholds-federal-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/#comment-260322</guid>
		<description>According to &lt;a href="http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_04_15-2007_04_21.shtml#1176924536" title="" rel="nofollow"&gt;Johnathan Adler&lt;/a&gt;, the statute contained a clause limiting itself to "partial-birth" abortions that are conducted “in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce.”  Thereby making a general challenge impossible on those grounds (although some free clinic only accepting in-state patients might have a specific challenge).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_04_15-2007_04_21.shtml#1176924536" title="" rel="nofollow">Johnathan Adler</a>, the statute contained a clause limiting itself to &#8220;partial-birth&#8221; abortions that are conducted “in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce.”  Thereby making a general challenge impossible on those grounds (although some free clinic only accepting in-state patients might have a specific challenge).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpm100</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/04/18/supreme-court-upholds-federal-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/#comment-260321</link>
		<dc:creator>jpm100</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/04/18/supreme-court-upholds-federal-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/#comment-260321</guid>
		<description>I'd say overall this bench still hangs to the left.  

Partial Birth Abortion popular opposition is more strongly against that for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say overall this bench still hangs to the left.  </p>
<p>Partial Birth Abortion popular opposition is more strongly against that for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ehrenstein</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/04/18/supreme-court-upholds-federal-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/#comment-260318</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ehrenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/04/18/supreme-court-upholds-federal-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/#comment-260318</guid>
		<description>I'm sure your daughter will be discreetly "taken care of" should (heaven forbid) the situation arise.

But then, you've got money.

Others don't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure your daughter will be discreetly &#8220;taken care of&#8221; should (heaven forbid) the situation arise.</p>
<p>But then, you&#8217;ve got money.</p>
<p>Others don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sandbox</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2007/04/18/supreme-court-upholds-federal-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/#comment-260315</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sandbox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/2007/04/18/supreme-court-upholds-federal-ban-on-partial-birth-abortion/#comment-260315</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Supreme Court Upholds Partial-Birth Abortion Ban...&lt;/strong&gt;

Uh oh, this one could get ugly:The Supreme Court upheld the nationwide ban on a controversial abortion procedure Wednesday, handing abortion opponents the long-awaited victory they expected from a more conservative bench. The 5-4 ruling said the Partia...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Supreme Court Upholds Partial-Birth Abortion Ban&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Uh oh, this one could get ugly:The Supreme Court upheld the nationwide ban on a controversial abortion procedure Wednesday, handing abortion opponents the long-awaited victory they expected from a more conservative bench. The 5-4 ruling said the Partia&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.221 seconds -->
